Cone-beam computed tomography in Endodontics: an exploratory research of the main clinical applications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11842

Keywords:

Endodontics; Imaging; Radiology; Cone beam computed tomography.

Abstract

This study revisited three oral radiology centers (ORC) and screened the main clinical indications that justified the request for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination in Endodontics. The databases of three ORCs were searched for requests of CBCT exams taken for Endodontic purposes over the last two years. The extracted data consisted of the total number of CBCT exams, the clinical indication in the endodontic field that justified the CBCT exam, the outcome of each exam (from the report of Oral Radiologists), and demographic data of the patients. From the total CBCT exams (n = 4,583), nearly 13% (n = 611) were taken for Endodontic purposes. Most of the clinical indications were related to root fractures (65%) and periapical lesions/disease (24.1%). Radiologists’ reports hypothesized more often toward periapical lesion/disease (70.5%), root fracture (51.4%) and accidents/complications (25.2%). Some clinical indications significantly varied based on age. In particular, post-traumatic imaging and the investigation of root resorption were more common in young patients, while the prevalence of exams for the investigation of pulpal calcifications and root fractures increased with age. More interestingly, there was a significant disagreement between the clinical indication that justified the CBCT examinations and the outcomes retrieved from radiologists’ reports (p < 0.005). This study illustrates the broad spectrum of CBCT applications for the diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up in Endodontics. Attention is necessary to the disagreements between clinical indications and imaging outcomes, especially because certain conditions in the routine Endodontics are only visible with the aid of advanced tools.

References

Brady, E., Mannocci, F., Brown, J., Wilson, R., & Patel, S. A. (2014). Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J, 47, 735-746. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12209

Ee, J., Fayad, M. I., & Johnson, B. R. (2014). Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography. J Endod, 40, 910-916. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.002

Fayad, M. I., Nair, M., Levin, M. D., et al. (2015). AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 120, 508-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.07.033

Gallichan, N., Albadri, S., Dixon, C., & Jorgenson, K. (2020). Trends in CBCT current practice within three UK paediatric dental departments. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 21, 537-542. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00526-w

Goga, R., Chandler, N. P., & Oginni, A. O. (2008). Pulp stones: a review. Int Endod J, 41, 457-468. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01374.x

Krug, R., Connert, T., Beinicke, A., et al. (2019). When and how do endodontic specialists use cone-beam computed tomography? Aust Endod J, 45, 365-372. http://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12337

Li, D., Tao, Y., Zhang W. C. M., Zhang, X., Hu, X. (2019). External root resorption in maxillary and mandibular second molars associated with impacted third molars: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. Clin Oral Investig, 23, 4195-4203. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02859-3

Lo Giudice, R., Nicita, F., Puleio, F., et al. (2018). Accuracy of periapical radiography and CBCT in endodontic evaluation. Int J Dent, 2514243, http://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2514243

Oenning, A. C., Jacobs, R., Pauwels, R., Stratis, A., Hedesiu, M., & Salmon, B. (2018). Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol, 48, 308-316. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9

Patel, S., Kanagasingam, S., & Mannocci, F. (2010). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in endodontics. Dent Update, 37, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2010.37.6.373

Patel, S., Durack, C., Abella, F., Shemesh, H., Roig, M., & Lemberg, K. (2015). Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review. Int Endod J, 48, 3-15. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12270

Patel, S., Brown, J., Pimentel, T., Kelly, R. D., Abella, F., & Durack, C. (2019). Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics – a review of the literature. Int Endod J, 52, 1138–52. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13115

Patel, S., Brown, J., Semper, M., Abella, F., & Mannocci, F. (2019). European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J, 52, 1675-1678. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187

Rodríguez, G., Abella, F., Durán-Sindreu, F., Patel, S., & Roig, M. (2017). Influence of cone-beam computed tomography in clinical decision making among specialists. J Endod, 43, 194-199. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.012

SEDENTEX CT Project, Sezgin, O. S., Kayipmaz, S., Yasar, D., Yilmaz, A., & Ozturk, M. H. (2011). Comparative dosimetry of dental cone beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography, and multislice computed tomography. Oral Radiology, 28, 32-37. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-011-0078-5

Van Acker, J. W. G., Martens, L. C., & Aps, J. K. M. (2016). Cone-beam computed tomography in pediatric dentistry, a retrospective observational study. Clin Oral Investig, 20, 1003-1010. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1592-3

Venskutonis, T., Plotino, G., Juodzbalys, Gi., & Mickevičiene, L. (2014). The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: A review of the literature. J Endod, 40, 1895-18901. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.009

Verner, F. S., D’Addazio, P. S., Campos, C. N., Devito, K. L., Almeida, S. M., & Junqueira, R. B. (2017). Influence of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography filters on diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int Endod J, 50, 1089-1096. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12732

Viana, W. A. M., Montagner, F., Vieira, H. T., Dias da Silveira, H. L., Arús, N. A., & Vizzotto, M. B. (2020). Can cone-beam computed tomography change endodontists’ level of confidence in diagnosis and treatment planning? A before and after study. J Endod, 46, 283-238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.021

Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., et al. (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg, 12, 1495-1499. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD

Ozer, S. Y. (2010). Detection of vertical root fractures of different thicknesses in endodontically enlarged teeth by cone beam computed tomography versus digital radiography. J Endod, 36, 1245-1249. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.021

Downloads

Published

22/01/2021

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, P. de A. C. .; FRANCO, A.; OLIVEIRA, L. B. .; SOUZA LIMA, C. A. .; JUNQUEIRA, J. L. C. .; CAVALETTE, M. R. M. L. .; OENNING, A. C. C. . Cone-beam computed tomography in Endodontics: an exploratory research of the main clinical applications. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. e42910111842, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11842. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11842. Acesso em: 1 mar. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences