Challenging poverty with green space in informal settlements of Quito

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11858

Keywords:

Green spaces; Informal settlements; Urban poverty.

Abstract

Planners increasingly recognize the value of green spaces to the wellbeing of urban residents. Research on ecosystem services has produced much of what is known about such value, although the attention is mainly on the cities’ core while informal settlements remain overlooked. Using a case study of informal settlements in Quito, this paper focuses on how their residents use the neighboring green space to fight poverty. The study uses data from interviews, field notes, and archives to show how green spaces escalate the capabilities of the neighboring residents to access everyday resources. A preserved landscape enhances the ability to walk and travel to everyday destinations; allotments reduce the reliance on debts with shop keepers to access food; and sports fields enable income generation and pursue a career.  These findings provide an understanding of how to address simultaneously environmental, social, and economic challenges in cities of developing countries. Planners engaged in the sustainable development agenda would benefit from this research.

Author Biography

Ignacio Loor, Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo

PhD en Geografía Humana por la Universidad de Manchester, Reino Unido. Tesis: Informal Green Infrastructure (IGI) and the pursuit of Sustainable Development in Quito City. Adicionalmente, obtuvo una maestría en Negocios Internacionales por Nova Southeastern University, Estados Unidos; y es Economista por la Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil, Ecuador.  Es investigador en urbanismo y desarrollo sostenible. Sus áreas de interés son infraestructura de asentamientos informales, el contexto social de biomateriales de construcción, infraestructura verde, organización social de asentamientos informales, prácticas informales y transición hacia carbono cero neto. Ha sido docente del módulo sobre Ciudades Sostenibles del curso Creating a Sustainable World: 21st Century Challenges and the Sustainable Development Goals de la Universidad de Manchester. Actualmente es director del Departamento de Investigación de la USGP.

References

Abad, L. A., & Lindert, P. H. (2017). Fiscal Redistribution in Latin America Since the Nineteenth Century Has Latin American Inequality Changed Direction? (pp. 243-282): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44621-9_11

Adegun, O. B. (2014). Green infrastructure and ecosystem services in informal urban settlements. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2017.1296791

Alova, G., & Burgess, G. (2017). Housing poverty in Ecuador: challenges to eradication. Survey Review, 49(353), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2015.1133519

Auyero, J. (2000). The hyper-shantytown: Neo-liberal violence(s) in the Argentine slum. Ethnography, 1(1), 93-116. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24047730. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661380022230651

Becker, M. (2011). Correa, indigenous movements, and the writing of a new constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0094582X10384209

Briant Carant, J. (2017). Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 16-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944

Choguill, C. L. (1996). Ten steps to sustainable infrastructure. Habitat International, 20(3), 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00013-6

Clark, P. (2013). Food sovereignty, post-neoliberalism, campesino organizations and the state in Ecuador. Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue, Yale, CT.

Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., & Van Den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. nature, 387(6630), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Crespo, A. R. V., Puerta, J. M., Corrales, M. E., Stone, L. F., Biau, J., Quintanilla, O., & Rivera, J. (2016). Documento de enfoque: Evaluación de la Iniciativa Ciudades Emergentes y Sostenibles del BID. shorturl.at/fqGJN on 10/05/2017

Daly, E. (2012). The Ecuadorian exemplar: the first ever vindications of constitutional rights of nature. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(1), 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00744.x

Davidson-Hunt, I., Idrobo, C., Janzen, A., Kuzivanova, V., Lizáraga, P., Robson, J., & Vacaflores, C. (2017). Biocultural Design Research Guide.

Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. Verso. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096080430050502

Denscombe, M. (2014) The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. (5th ed.). Maindenhead: Open University Press.

El Telégrafo. (2014, December 3rd, 2014). El deporte barrial en Quito agrupa a 7600 clubes y 350 ligas [The neighbourhood sport in Quito groups 7600 clubs and 350 leagues]. El Telégrafo. http://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/quito/11/el-deporte-barrial-en-quito- agrupa-a-7-600-clubes-y-350-ligas-infografia

Greene, N. (2011). The first successful case of the Rights of Nature implementation in Ecuador. The Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature. http://therightsofnature. org/first-ron-case-ecuador.

Hagenaars, A., & De Vos, K. (1988). The definition and measurement of poverty. Journal of human resources, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/145776

Haque, M. S. (2000). Environmental discourse and sustainable development: Linkages and limitations. Ethics and the Environment, 3-21.

Horn, P. (2017). Indigenous peoples, the city and inclusive urban development policies in Latin America: Lessons from Bolivia and Ecuador. Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12234

Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human studies, 8(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142995

Jácome, E. (2017a, 8 January 2017). El 60% de las edificaciones son informales en el Distrito Metropolitano de Quito. El Comercio. http://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/municipio-quito-regulacion-viviendas-informales.html.

Jácome, E. (2017). Quito, capital provincial con más espacios verdes del país. El Comercio.

Jordán Fuchs, R., Simioni, D., & degli Affari Esteri, I. M. (2003). Gestión urbana para el desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe: CEPAL.

Kaplan, A., Velibeyoğlu, K., Kılıçaslan, Ç., Özeren, M., and İnce, İ. (2013) "Revisiting Urban Brownfield Regeneration and Beyond within the Lens of Green Infrastructure-based Design and Management," Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning. 4(1) https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fabos/vol4/iss1/38 Access 14/05/2019

Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2014). Scaling up Buen Vivir: globalizing local environmental governance from ecuador. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00256

Lossouarn, C., Pangare, V., Fenghua, S., Lentini, E. J., Loftus, T., Dickinson, M. A., & Phan, T. S. H. (2016). Water, Megacities and Global Change: UNESCO & ARCEAU-IdF.

Lüthi, C., Panesar, A., Schütze, T., Norström, A., McConville, J., Parkinson, J., & Action, A. F. (2011). [P.] Sustainable Sanitation in Cities A framework for action.

Mara, D. (1996). Low-cost sewerage: John Wiley. http://shorturl.at/ghH69 Access 19/04/2017

Mara, D., & Alabaster, G. (2008). A new paradigm for low-cost urban water supplies and sanitation in developing countries. Water Policy, 10(2), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2008.034

McIntosh, C., Alegria, T., Ordoñez, G., & Zenteno, R. (2013). Slum Infrastructure Upgrading and Budgeting Spillovers: The Case of Mexico’s Hábitat Program. Conference Proceedings UCSD. http://shorturl.at/gkyzS Access 10/12/2020

McMichael, P. (2011). Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective: A Global Perspective: Sage Publications.

Milou, A. (2008). Stormwater LID alternatives for low income settlements in Central America: The case of Ocotillo Anexo, Honduras. Tufts University.

Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2013). Urban poverty in the global south: scale and nature: Routledge.

Motzny, A. (2015). Prioritizing vacant properties for green infrastructure. University of Michigan. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113080 Access 11/07/2017

Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UAB/ NTE/ UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Com putacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1 Accessed 12/01/2021

Radcliffe, S. A. (2012). Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003

Rashid S. F. (2009). Strategies to reduce exclusion among populations living in urban slum settlements in Bangladesh. Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 27(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v27i4.3403

Rueda Carrillo, M. E. (2015). La percepción actual y la calidad del verde en Quito: Un análisis de su potencial de sostenibilidad para responder a los retos de la agenda hábitat. PUCE.

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.

Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice: SAGE publications.

Thompson, C. W., Roe, J., Aspinall, P., Mitchell, R., Clow, A., & Miller, D. (2012). More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and urban planning, 105(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015

Verdesoto, L., Donoso, R., Aldaz, R., Valdivieso, L., Marcillo, J., Chalco, S., & Morochz, I. (2009). Quito, un caleidoscopio de percepciones midiendo la calidad de vida. La calidad de vida.

WHO. (2012). Indicators for Health in Sustainable Cities. Paper presented at the WHO Expert Consultation in the Context of Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development, New York, USA.

Downloads

Published

13/01/2021

How to Cite

LOOR, I.; RIVADENEIRA, L.; RIVADENEIRA, J. Challenging poverty with green space in informal settlements of Quito. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. e29310111858, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11858. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11858. Acesso em: 21 jan. 2021.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences