Prospective Scenarios for Social Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15111Keywords:
Cooperativism; Prospective Scenarios; Innovation; Social Innovation; Logic Et.Abstract
Social Innovation has its field based on the creation of solutions in face of social needs, driven by several agents that organize themselves under the most different legal types, expanding the action of Social Innovation (SI) from a local to national or international field. These social changes impose challenges for managers who start to consider SI as a new dimension for strategy and planning in organizations, requiring the elaboration of future scenarios. The aim of this study was to develop prospective scenarios for social innovation in the short-term. The approach is qualitative and quantitative, using Evidential Annotated Paraconsistent Logic (Et logic). A questionnaire was prepared, containing 58 questions, 57 of which were closed and 1 was open. In order to validate the questionnaire a priori, 3 specialists were consulted, the proposals were confirmed through Delphi rounds and an internal consistency test measured by Cronbach's Alpha. The sample consisted of 26 participants, distributed in two groups, group A formed by 13 specialists and group B by 13 professional managers or who have participated in social projects. To measure whether there is a statistically significant difference between the groups, the Levene test was used. The results indicate that there is no significant difference between the groups and validate the short-term models, which contain the factors distributed in transformation, innovation, geography of innovation, actors and processes.
References
Abe, J. M.;Costa, N. C. A. da. (1992). Fundamentos da lógica anotada (Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia)). USP.
Astigarraga, E. (2003). El Metodo Delphi. San Sebastián, Spain: Universidad de Deusto, 1–14.
Brown, J. D.. (2002). The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 6(1), 17–18.
Budiaji, W. (2013). Skala Pengukuran Dan Jumlah Respon Skala Likert. Ilmu Pertanian Dan Perikanan, 2(2), 127–133. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/k7bgy/
Carvalho, F. R.; Abe, J. M.. (2011). Tomadas de decisão com ferramentas da lógica paraconsistente anotada. Blucher.
Carvalho, F. R. de, Brustein, I., & Abe, J. M. (2011). Tomadas de Decisão com ferramentas da Lógica Paraconsistente Anotada. XXIII Encontro Nac. de Eng. de Produção, 1, 1–8.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation : the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Choi, J. P., & Thum, M. (2005). Corruption and the Shadow Economy*. International Economic Review, 46(3), 817–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2005.00347.x
Costa, N. C. A. da, & Abe, J. M. (2000). Paraconsistência em informática e inteligência artificial. Estudos Avançados, 14(39), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142000000200012
Davis, J. A. (1976). Levantamento de Dados em Sociologia. Zahr.
Drucker, P. F. (1987). Social innovation—Management’s new dimension. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(87)90129-4
Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The Impact of Levene’s Test of Equality of Variances on Statistical Theory and Practice. Statistical Science, 24(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS301
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. In Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909
Hacklin, F., Raurich, V., & Marxt, C. (2004). How incremental innovation becomes disruptive: the case of technology convergence. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 1, 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407070
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Analise multivariada de dados. In Bookman. Bookman.
Hamilton, D. M., & Breslawski, S. (1996). Knowledge acquisition for multiple site, related domain expert systems: Delphi process and application. Expert Systems with Applications, 11(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(96)00052-8
Kanter, R. M. (1996). Classe Mundial, uma agenda para gerenciar os desafios globais em benefício das empresas e das comunidades. Campus.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Levene, H. (1960). Robust testes for equality of variances. InContributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA, I. Olkin, 278–292.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. In Archives of Psychology. of Psychologu.
Lind, N. (2014). Human Development Index (HDI). In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3012–3013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1342
Macnaughton, R. J. (1996). Numbers, scales, and qualitative research. The Lancet, 347(9008), 1099–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90286-X
Mannarelli Filho, T., Donadon, F. A. B., Pigatto, G. A. S., Queiróz, T. R., & Baptista, R. D. (2021). Responsabilidade social, sustentabilidade e inovação no setor sucroenergético brasileiro: Tendências e perspectivas. Research, Society and Development, 10(4), e32610414317. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14317
Mintzberg, H. (1987). The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165263
Morin, E. (2000). Os sete saberes necess á rios à educa çã o do futuro (2nd ed.); Cortez.
Papakostas, N., Papachatzakis, P., Xanthakis, V., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2010). An approach to operational aircraft maintenance planning. Decision Support Systems, 48(4), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.11.010
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6.
PNUD Brasil. (2020). Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano. https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/idh0/conceitos/o-que-e-o-idh.html
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Reis, N. F. (2014). Método Paraconsistente de Cenários Prospectivos (Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção)), Universidade Paulista). https://www3.unip.br/presencial/ensino/pos_graduacao/strictosensu/eng_producao/download/eng_neliofernandodosreis.pdf
Reis, N. F., Oliveira, C. C. De, Abe, J. M., & Andrade, A. G. (2019). Support System Decision with Logic Et applied to Merger and Acquisition - M & A : a case study in the education industry. International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR), 04(04), 45–50.
Rowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: A Re-Evaluation of Research and Theory. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 39, 235–251.
Rozados, H. B. F. (2015). O uso da técnica Delphi como alternativa metodológica para a área da Ciência da Informação. Em Questão, 21(3), 64–86. https://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/article/download/58422/36043%0A
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, M. del P. B. (2010). Metodología de la investigación (Quinta). Colonia Desarrollo Santa Fe - McGRAW-HILL / Interamericana Editoras S.A. de C. V.
Sanches, C., Marietto, M. L., & Paixão, M. R. (2011). Desenvolvimento e validação de questionário multidimensional, por meio de lógica paraconsistente, para medir a práxis de gestão de responsabilidade sócio ambiental. SIMPOI, 1–16. < https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcio_Marietto/publication/297920574_Desenvolvimento_e_validacao_de_questionario_multidimensional_por_meio_de_logica_paraconsistente_para_medir_a_praxis_de_festao_de_responsabilidade_socioambiental/links/56e4b14a08ae9
Sanches, C., Meireles, M., & Sordi, J. O. de. (2011). Análise Qualitativa Por Meio da Lógica Paraconsistente: Método de Interpretação e Síntese de Informações Obtida por Escalas Likert. III Encontro de Ensino e Pesquisa Em Administração e Contabilidade.
Schwartz, P. (1996). The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
Singer, P. (2011). Economia solidária versus economia capitalista. Sociedade e Estado, 16(1–2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69922001000100005
Tardif, C., & Harrisson, D. (2005). Complémentarité, convergence et transversalité: la conceptualisation de l’innovation sociale au CRISES. Collection Études Théoriques.
Velez Pareja, I. (2003). The Delphi Method (El Metodo Delphi). SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.420040
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why more equal societies almost always do better (Penguin, Ed.). Bloomsbury Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Alequexandre Galvez de Andrade; Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim; Nélio Fernando dos Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
