World scientific production on biofloc technology in tilapiculture as a driver of sustainable development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15200

Keywords:

Fish farming; Bioflocs; Sustainability; Technological development; Agribusiness.

Abstract

The purpose of this review study was to evaluate the economic, social and environmental sustainability of biofloc biotechnology in the cultivation of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. With a systematic review, it was used as methodology the details of the exclusion and inclusion criteria adopted for the selection of the sample and analysis of the content of the publications. The articles used in this study were searched on the Scopus and Web of Science databases. As for the analysis, the meta-analysis was used, opting for the mixed nature, that is, qualitative and quantitative of articles published in scientific journals from 2008 to 2021. It was found that the economic, social and environmental assessment that contemplates sustainable development is found. if in the initial phase of approach, in view of the number of articles that contemplate the subject, in the analyzed period. The studies carried out using the biofloc technology belong mainly to the technical order, followed by the sustainability of the technology used, positive aspects in relation to the economic scope, however, there is a deficit in the approach of the social aspects involved with the application of this biotechnology.

References

Ahmad, I., Rani, A. M. B., Verma, A. K. & Maqsood, M. (2017). Biofloc technology: an emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquaculture International, 25, 1215–1226.

Alves, G. F. O., Fernandes, A. F. A., Alvarenga, E. R., Turra, E. M., Sousa, A. B. & Teixeira, E. A. (2017). Effect of the transfer at different moments of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to the biofloc system in formation. Aquaculture, 479, 564–570.

Avnimelech, Y. (1999). Carbon ⁄ nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture, 176, 227–235.

Avnimelech, Y. (2007). Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture, 264, 140–147.

Avnimelech, Y. (2009). Biofloc Technology — A Practical Guide Book. Baton Rouge, LA: The World Aquaculture Society, 182.

Azim, M.E. & Little, D. C. (2008). The bioflocs technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: water quality, bioflocs composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 283, 29–35.

Bossier, P. & Ekasari, J. (2017). Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals. Microbial Biotechnology, 10(5), 1012–1016.

Cavalcante, D. H., Lima, F. R.S., Rebouças, V. T. & Carmo e Sá, M. V. (2017). Nile tilapia culture under feeding restriction in bioflocs and bioflocs plus periphyton tanks Cultura de tilapia do Nilo sob restrição de alimentação em bioflocs e bioflocs mais tanques de perifita. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 39(3), 223-228.

Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., & Verstraete, W. (2012). Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture, 356, 351–356.

Day, S. B., Salie, K. & Stander, H. B. (2016). A growth comparison among three commercial tilapia species in a biofloc system. Aquaculture International, 24, 1309-1322.

Ekasari, J., Angela, D., Waluyo, S. H., Bachtiar, T., Surawidjaja, E. H., Bossier, P., De Schryver. P. (2014). The size of biofloc determines the nutritional composition and the Nitrogen recovery by aquaculture animals. Aquaculture, 426–427, 105–111.

Ekasari, J., Azhar, M.H., Surawidjaja, E.H., Nuryati, S., De Schryver, P., & Bossier, P. (2014). Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 41, 332–339.

Ekasari, J., Rivandi, D. R., Firdausi, A. P., Surawidjaja, E. H., Bossier, P. & De Schryver, P. (2015). Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 441, 72–77.

Fachin, O. (2006). Fundamentos de metodologia. 5. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.

FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2019). The state of food security and nutrition in the world.

Galvão, T. F. & Pereira, M. G. (2014). Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: passos para sua elaboração. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, Brasília, 23(1), 183-184.

Haridas, H., Verma, A. K., Rathore, G., Prakash, C., Sawant, P. B. & Rani, A. M. B. (2017). Enhanced growth and immuno-physiological response of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia in indoor biofloc units at different stocking densities. Aquaculture Research, 48, 4346–4355.

Jorge A. Pérez-Fuentes, J. A., Hernández-Vergara, M. P., Pérez-Rostro, C. I. & Fogel, I. (2016) C:N ratios affect nitrogen removal and Production of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus raised in a biofloc system under high density cultivation. Aquaculture, 452, 247–251.

López-Elías, J. A., Moreno-Arias, A., Miranda-Baeza, A., Martínez-Córdova, L. R., Rivas-Vega, M. E. & Márquez-Ríos, E. (2015). Proximate composition of bioflocs in culture systems containing hybrid red tilapia fed diets with varying levels of vegetable meal inclusion. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 77(1), 102-109.

Luo, G. Avnimelech, Y., Pan, Y. & Tan, H. (2013). Inorganic nitrogen dynamics in sequencing batch reactors using biofloc technology to treat aquaculture sludge. Aquacultural Engineering, 52, 73–79.

Manduca, L. G., da Silva, M. A., de Alvarenga, É. R., de Oliveira Alves, G. F., de Araújo Fernandes, A. F., Assumpção, A. F., & Turra, E. M. (2020). Effects of a zero exchange biofloc system on the growth performance and health of Nile tilapia at different stocking densities. Aquaculture, 735064.

Mansour, A. T. & Esteban, M. A. (2017). Effects of carbon sources and plant protein levels in a biofloc system on growth performance, and the immune and antioxidant status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 64, 202-209.

Martins, G. B., Tarouco F., Rosa, C. E. & Robaldo, R. B. (2017). The utilization of sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate or hydroxide in biofloc system: water quality, growth performance and oxidative stress of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 468, 10-17.

Pasco, J J. M. (2015). Aeração em cultivos superintensivos de tilápias Oreochromis niloticus, em bioflocos e com troca mínima de água. Tese apresentada ao Programa de PósGraduação em Aquicultura da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. 120p.

Pérez-Fuentes, A., Perez-Rostro, C.I. & Hernandez-Vergara, M. (2013). Pond-reared Malaysian prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii with the biofloc system. Aquaculture, 400, 105–110.

Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa Social: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas.

Silva, J. L. S. da, Cavalcante, D. H., Carvalho, F. C. T. de, Vieira, R. H. S. F., Carmo e Sá, M. V. & Sousa, O. V. de. (2016). Aquatic microbiota diversity in the culture of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using bioflocs or periphyton: virulence factors and biofilm formation. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 38(3), 233-241.

Silva, U. L., Falcon, D. R., Pessôa, M. N. C. & CORREIA, E. S. (2017) Carbon sources and C:N ratios on water quality for Nile tilapia farming in Biofloc System. Revista Caatinga, 30(4), 1017-1027.

Tubin, J. S. B., Paiano, D., de Oliveira Hashimoto, G. S., Furtado, W. E., Martins, M. L., Durigon, E., & Emerenciano, M. G. C. (2019). Tenebrio molitor meal in diets for Nile tilapia juveniles reared in biofloc system. Aquaculture, 734763.

Zhua, S. M., Shia, M. M., Yun, Y. J., Guoa, X. S, Yea, Z. Y. Hana, Z. Y., Denga, Y. L. & Liuaa, G. (2016). Applications of computational fluid dynamics to modeling hydrodynamics in tilapia rearing tank of Recirculating Biofloc Technology system. Aquacultural Engineering, 74, 120–130.

Published

16/05/2021

How to Cite

TAVARES, S. G. .; QUEIROZ, S. S. de .; BERTOLINI, G. R. F. .; GRANDI, A. M. de .; RODRIGUES, M. L. .; SIGNOR, A. World scientific production on biofloc technology in tilapiculture as a driver of sustainable development. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. e56910515200, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15200. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15200. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Review Article