Personality mapping of incoming and undergraduating students of the Industrial Engineering graduation at the Federal University of Itajubá
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i2.1874Keywords:
Personality Tests; Big Five; Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI); Industrial Engineering.Abstract
Considering that the market tends to be competitive in the search for better technologies, tools and methodologies to reach their goals, companies have been looking for professionals with profile compatible with the job opportunity of the organization. For this, recruiters can use personality tests as a complement in the selection process, one of these methods is Big Five. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to identify personality traits of students in a course and to compare the traits of incoming students with graduating students. This work was conducted by means of a Survey, in which the necessary data for the research can be obtained. As a result, there was a similarity between the personality traits of incoming students and graduating students. In addition, in terms of extroversion, both have a high level of adherence to this trait, but when it comes to opening new experiences, new entrants are more conservative than seniors.
References
Abepro. Áreas e Subáreas da Engenharia de Produção. Disponível em < http://www.abepro.org.br>, acessado em < 23 de julho de 2019>, 2019.
Akhtar, H. (2018). Translation and validation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) into Bahasa Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(2), 59-69.
Ayub, N., AlQurashi, S. M., Al-Yafi, W. A., & Jehn, K. (2017). Personality traits and conflict management styles in predicting job performance and conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(5), 671-694.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 38(4), 476.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cunha, G. D. (2002). Um panorama atual da Engenharia de Produção. Abepro. Porto Alegre.
Costa, D. F. da, Monteiro, J. A., de Castro, J. B., Júnior, A. D. L. C., & Sales, G. L. (2019). Strategies for the elaboration of a gamed activity script. Research, Society and Development, 8(11), 188111451.
Raad, B. de, di Blas, L., & Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12(1), 19-41.
Souza Junior, J. M. de, & Mazzafera, B. L. (2019). Students conceptions on digital information and communication technologies for legal activities. Research, Society and Development, 8(11), 258111466.
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and individual differences, 12(8), 773-790.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality, 37(6), 504-528.
Guedes, A. M. S., de Souza, T. S. A., de Azevedo, I. F., Noronha, W. F. R., & Alves, F. R. V. (2019). Didactic engineering as a tool for the design of a learning object applied to the teaching of probability. Research, Society and Development, 8(11), 058111430.
Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory: Versions 4a and 54 [Technical Report]. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European journal of Personality, 2(3), 171-203.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102-138.
Johnson, J. A., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five-factor model with the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(3), 563.
Kayiş, A. R., Satici, S. A., Yilmaz, M. F., Şimşek, D., Ceyhan, E., & Bakioğlu, F. (2016). Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 35-40.
Martins, R. A., Mello, J. B. P., & Turrioni, C. H. (2013). Guia para elaboração de monografia e TCC em engenharia de produção. Editora Atlas SA.
Van de Ven, N., Bogaert, A., Serlie, A., Brandt, M. J., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Personality perception based on LinkedIn profiles. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(6), 418-429.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574.
Nose, M. M., & REBELATTO, D. A. D. N. (2001). A atuação do engenheiro de produção: a realidade das empresas. Anais... Cobenge, São Paulo.
Oliveira, V. F. de, Pinto–danilo, D. P., & Tietê, R. (2006). Educação em Engenharia como área do conhecimento.
Santos, A. V. D., & Pereira, C. C. (2017). O Perfil do Engenheiro de Produção segundo gestores de empresas do vale do Paraíba: uma reflexão acerca do modelo de formação desses profissionais.
Raupp, F. M., & Beuren, I. M. (2006). Metodologia da Pesquisa Aplicável às Ciências. Como elaborar trabalhos monográficos em contabilidade: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Atlas.
Royle, M. T. (2015). Theoretical drivers of early career success for new entrants to the job market. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 8(1), 31-56.
Streiner, S., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L., & Bursic, K. (2014). An approach to evaluate engineering global preparedness in industrial engineering curricula. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 2389). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
Triola, M F. (2008). Introdução à estatística. 10 ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Tupes, E. C., Christal, R. C. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Technical Report, USAF, Lackland Air Force Base, TX 1961
Van de Ven, N., Bogaert, A., Serlie, A., Brandt, M. J., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Personality perception based on LinkedIn profiles. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(6), 418-429.
Zainaghi, G., Akamine, E. G., & Bremer, C. F. (2001, January). Análise do perfil profissional do engenheiro de produção adquirido nas atividades extracurriculares. In CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENSINO DE ENGENHARIA-COBENGE (Vol. 2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
