Instruments for wound assessment: scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19246Keywords:
Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries; Evidence-based practice.Abstract
The aim is to identify and describe the main instruments used for wound analysis, in addition to raising their validation and cross-cultural adaptation to the Portuguese language. This is a scope review prepared according to the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The Regional Portal of the Virtual Health Library (BVS), MEDLINE (under the Pubmed interface), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS and Scielo databases were consulted in order to identify studies that used at least one instrument validated for wound assessment by January 2021. Gray literature was verified using Google Scholar. The search strategy was developed using Health Science Descriptors (DeCS) and MeSH terms such as wound healing, assessment study and nursing assessment. Studies were included regardless of the design used, only studies that did not report the use of any instrument for wound assessment, or studies involving preclinical models were excluded. Two reviewers selected the articles independently. The instruments found were described and categorized after the reviewers' calibration. 51 instruments for wound assessment were found in a total of 110 selected studies. These instruments involved different approaches in clinical practice (wound healing, infection, pain caused by the wound, etc.). However, only eight (15.7%) were cross-culturally adapted for use in the Portuguese language. This study suggests that more instruments must be developed and adapted to the Portuguese language of Brazil, so that the diagnosis and treatment of wounds can be more accurate.
References
Abbade, L. P. F. (2010). Preparo do leito da ferida. In W. Malagutti (Ed.), Curativos, Estomias e Dermatologia: uma abordagem profissional. (pp. 63–76). Martinari.
Alves, D. F. dos S., Almeida, A. O. de, Silva, J. L. G., Morais, F. I., Dantas, S. R. P. E., & Alexandre, N. M. C. (2015). Translation and Adaptation of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool for the Brazilian culture. Texto Contexto Enferm, 24(3), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072015001990014
Aron, S., & Gamba, M. A. (2009). Preparo do Leito da Ferida e a História do TIMEWound Bed Preparation and a History of TIME. ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther., 7(4).
Bates-Jensen, B. M., Vredevoe, D. L., & Brecht, M. L. (1992). Validity and reliabitity of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Decubitus, 5(6), 20–28.
Bergin, S. M., Gurr, J. M., Allard, B. P., Holland, E. L., Horsley, M. W., Kamp, M. C., Lazzarini, P. A., Nube, V. L., Sinha, A. K., Warnock, J. T., Alford, J. B., & Wraight, P. R. (2012). Australian Diabetes Foot Network: management of diabetes‐related foot ulceration — a clinical update. Medical Journal of Australia, 197(4), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja11.10347
Brasil. (2021). Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade - SIM. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sim/cnv/obt10RJ.def
Cardinelli, C. C., Lopes, L. P. N., Di Piero, K. C., & Freitas, Z. M. F. (2021). Tools for wound assessment: a scoping review. https://doi.org/ 10.17605/OSF.IO/SREY3
Carville, K., Lewin, G., Newall, N., Haslehurst, P., Michael, R., Santamaria, N., & Roberts, P. (2007). STAR: a consensus for skin tear classification. Primary Intention, 15(1), 8–25.
Chadwick, P., Edmonds, M., McCardle, J., & Armstrong, D. (2013). International Best Practice Guidelines: Wound Management in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Wounds International.
Costa, R. K. de S., Torres, G. de V., Salvetti, M. de G., Azevedo, I. C. de, & Costa, M. A. T. da. (2015). Instrument for evaluating care given by undergraduate nursing students to people with wounds. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, 49(2), 0317–0325. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000200018
Dantas, D. V., Torres, G. D. V., & Dantas, R. A. N. (2012). Assistência aos portadores de feridas: caracterização dos protocolos existentes no Brasil. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v10i2.8572
Domingues, E. A. R., Carvalho, M. R. F., & Kaizer, U. A. de O. (2018). Adaptação transcultural de um instrumento de avaliação de feridas. Cogitare Enfermagem, 23(3), e2684. https://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v23i3.54927
EPUAP, NPIAP, & PPPIA. (2019). Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline (3a). EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA.
Evans, R., Kuhnke, J. L., Burrows, C., Kayssi, A., Labrecque, C., O’Sullivan-Drombolis, D., & Houghton, P. (2019). Best Practice Recommendations For The Prevention and Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Canadian Association of Wound Care (Wounds Canada).
Garbuio, D. C., Zamarioli, C. M., Silva, N. C. M. da, Oliveira-Kumakura, A. R. D. S., & Carvalho, E. C. (2018). Instrumentos para avaliação da cicatrização de lesões de pele: revisão integrativa. Rev. Eletr. Enferm, 20. https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v20.49425
Günes, U. Y. (2009). A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage, 55(5), 48–52.
Harris, C., Bates-Jensen, B., Parslow, N., Raizman, R., Singh, M., & Ketchen, R. (2010). Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 37(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181d73aab
Healey, F. (1997). Classificação das úlceras de pressão II. Nursing, 109, 16–20.
International Diabetes Federation. (2015). IDF Diabetes Atlas (7a.).
Leblanc, K., Baranoski, S., Christensen, D., Langemo, D., Sammon, M. A., Edwards, K., Holloway, S., Gloeckner, M., Williams, A., Sibbald, R. G., & Regan, M. (2013). International skin tear advisory panel: A tool kit to aid in the prevention, assessment, and treatment of skin tears using a simplified classification system. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 26(10), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000434056.04071.68
Lima, R. V. K. S., Coltro, P. S., & Farina Júnior, J. A. (2017). Negative pressure therapy for the treatment of complex wounds. Revista Do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 44(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912017001001
Lipsky, B. A., Berendt, A. R., Cornia, P. B., Pile, J. C., Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., Deery, H. G., Embil, J. M., Joseph, W. S., Karchmer, A. W., Pinzur, M. S., & Senneville, E. (2012). 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infectionsa. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54(12), e132–e173. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis346
Mandelbaum, S. H., Di Santis, É. P., & Mandelbaum, M. H. S. (2003). Cicatrização: conceitos atuais e recursos auxiliares - Parte I. An. Bras. Dermatol., 78(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962003000400002
Olczyk, P., Mencner, Ł., & Komosinska-Vassev, K. (2014). The Role of the Extracellular Matrix Components in Cutaneous Wound Healing. BioMed Research International, 2014, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/747584
Ousey, K., Rogers, A. A., & Rippon, M. G. (2016). Hydro-responsive wound dressings simplify T.I.M.E. wound management framework. British Journal of Community Nursing, 21(Sup12), S39–S49. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.Sup12.S39
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Trico, A., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
Restrepo-Medrano, J. C., & Verdú Soriano, J. (2011). Desarrollo de un índice de medida de la evolución hacia la cicatrización de las heridas crónicas. Gerokomos, 22(4), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1134-928X2011000400005
Santos, V. L. C. de G., Azevedo, M. A. J., Silva, T. S. da, Carvalho, V. M. J., & Carvalho, V. F. de. (2005). Adaptação Transcultural Do Pressure Ulcer Scale For Healing (Push) Para A Língua Portuguesa. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem, 13(3), 305–313.
Silva, C. V. B., Campanili, T., LeBlanc, K., Baranoski, S., & Santos, V. (2018). Adaptação cultural e validade de conteúdo do ISTAP Skin Tear Classification para o português no Brasil. ESTIMA, Braz. J. Enterostomal Ther, 16, e2618. https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v16.590_PT
Silveira, I. A., Oliveira, B. G. R. B. de, Souza, P. A. de, Santana, R. F., & Carvalho, M. R. de. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool for Brazil: nursing methodology research. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0944
Strazzieri-Pulido, K. C., Santos, V. L. C. de G., & Carville, K. (2015). Cultural adaptation, content validity and inter-rater reliability of the “STAR Skin Tear Classification System.” Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 23(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3523.2537
Tchero, H., Kangambega, P., Fluieraru, S., Bekara, F., & Teot, L. (2019). Management of infected diabetic wound: a scoping review of guidelines. F1000Research, 8, 737. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18978.1
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Waidman, M. A. P., Rocha, S. C., Correa, J. L., Brischiliari, A., & Marcon, S. S. (2011). O Cotidiano Do Indivíduo Com Ferida Crônica E Sua Saúde Mental. Texto Contexto Enferm2, 20(4), 691–699.
Woodbury, M. G., Houghton, P. E., Campbell, K. E., & Keast, D. H. (2004). Development, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a new leg ulcer measurement tool. Adv Skin Wound Care, 17(4), 187–196. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/%0Apubmed/15360028
Yamada, B. F. A., & Santos, V. L. C. de G. (2009). Development and Validation of Ferrans & Powers Quality of Life Index - Wound version*. Rev Esc Enferm USP, 43(Spe), 1033–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Camila Castanho Cardinelli; Luis Phillipe Nagem Lopes; Karina Chamma Di Piero; Zaida Maria Faria de Freitas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
