Flexible work and free time: Postmodern utopias

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19372

Keywords:

Flexiblework; Leisure; Utopia.

Abstract

The transformations in the world of work in the late 1990s and the first decades of the 21st century substantially altered the spatio-temporal relations and workers' productivity. New arrangements due to the informational and specialized nature of home office services have fostered the social belief that we are in the era of flexible work and free time. In this sense, the aim of this essay is to demonstrate that free time in Marx's perspective, possible only with the reduction of working hours, in post-modernity takes on a utopian guise in which, increasingly, the worker has been transforming the reserved period to rest in other forms of work such as uberization and telework. This study is bibliographic and what was found is that the fetish of flexibility and free time for the worker is one of the great attractions for adherence to types of flexible work, being another strategy of capitalism for the exploitation of labor physical and intellectual of the worker.

Author Biographies

Alessandro Fonseca Câmara, Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais

Graduated in Administration from the State University of Montes Claros (1996) Specialization in Strategic Management from UNIMONTES (2000), Specialization in Distance Education from UNIMONTES (2013). He is an Administrator at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Northern Minas Gerais - IFNMG. Coordinator of Administration and Planning at CEAD-IFNMG; It develops activities to support Distance Education. Participates in several committees and commissions for institutional development and especially for Education in the area covered by the IFNMG. Master's student in social development at UNIMONTES

Maria da Luz Alves Ferreira, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros

He holds a doctorate in Human Sciences (Sociology and Politics) (2007), from UFMG, and a master's degree in Sociology from the University of Brasília (2000). She is a full professor in the Department of Politics and Social Sciences and teaches in the Social Sciences Course and in the Postgraduate Program in Social Development at the State University of Montes Claros. Area of ​​expertise: Sociology, with an emphasis on Contemporary Sociological Theory, working mainly on the following themes: informal work, citizenship and gender relations, stratification and social inequalities: race, gender and class and Latin American sociology. She held the position of Head of the Department of Politics and Social Sciences at UNIMONTES in the 2007-2009 biennium, having been re-elected for the 2009-2011 biennium. She was a Productivity Scholar at the Research Support Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais - BIP/FAPEMIG (2015 and 2016). She was operational coordinator of the Interinstitutional Doctorate in Social Sciences agreement between the State University of Rio de Janeiro and the State University of Montes Claros 2012 - 2016. She was the associate coordinator of the Postgraduate Program in Social Development - PPGDS in the biennium 2014-2016. She was Editor of Revista Argumentos from 2011 to 2017. She was coordinator of the Graduate Program in Social Development - PPGDS for the biennium 2016-2018. She is a researcher in the Study and Research Group on Evaluation of Public and Social Policies and in the Gender and Violence Research Group. It is a member of the Brazilian Network of Latin American and Caribbean Researchers - BLAC (since 2017) and a member of the Latin American Council of Social Sciences - CLASCO.

References

Alves, G (2011). Trabalho e subjetividade. O espírito do toyotismo na era do capitalismo manipulatório. Boitempo.

Abílio, L. C. (2019). Uberização: Do empreendedorismo para o autogerenciamento subordinado. Psicoperspectivas, 18(3), 41-51, https://scielo.conicyt.c l/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-69242019000300041&lng=es&nrm=iso.

Albornoz, S. G. (2003). Trabalho e utopia na modernidade. Cad. psicol. soc. trab.[online], 6, 1-13. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo. php?scrip t=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-37172003000200002.

Albornoz, S. G. (2010). Tempo livre e humanização: dúvidas e esperanças ante as novas possibilidades de lazer. Cad. psicol. soc. trab.[online]. 13(1), 89-101. ISSN 1516-3717. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-37172010000100008

Abramides, Maria B. C. & Cabral, M. S. R. (2003) Regime de acumulação flexível e saúde do trabalhador. São Paulo Perspec. 17(1), 3-10, http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-88392003000100002&lng=en&nrm=iso.

Antunes, R. (1998). Lutas sociais e desenho societal no Brasil dos anos 90. Revista Crítica Marxista. Xamã VM, 7.

Antunes, R. (2006). Adeus Ao Trabalho? Ensaio sobre as metamorfoses e a centralidade no mundo do trabalho. (7a ed.). Cortez.

Antunes, R. (org.). (2020). Uberização, trabalho digital e indústria 4.0. Boitempo. 333 pp.

Brasil (2011). Lei n. 12.551, de 15 de dezembro de 2011. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 16 dez. Seção 1. http://www. planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12551.htm.

Brasil (2017). Lei n. 13.467, de 13 de julho de 2017. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 13 julho. Seção 1. http://http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_ 03/_ato2 015-2018/2017/lei/l13467.htm.

Bloch, E. (1967). O homem como ser em possibilidade. Revista Tempo Brasileiro,

Bloch, E. (2006). O princípio esperança. Contraponto.

Christensen, K. M. (2012). O dilema da Inovação: Quando as novas tecnologias levam empresas ao fracasso. São Paulo: Editora M. Books editora do Brasil Ltda.

Harvey, D. A. (1992). Condição pós-moderna. Loyola.

Mandel. E. M. (2020). A crise atual e o futuro do trabalho humano. Emblemas, 17(2), 123 – 144.

Marx, K. (1985). O Capital. Crítica da Economia Política. Livro 1 – O Processo de Produção do Capital. 1 (10). DIFEL Difusão Editorial S.A.

Marx, K. (2004). Manuscritos econômico-filosóficos. Tradução de Jesus Ranieri. Boitempo.

Marx, K. (2011). Os Grundisse. Boitempo.

More, T. (1988). Utopia. Europa-América.

Pizzani, L. et al (2012). A arte da pesquisa bibliográfica na busca do conhecimento. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 10(2), 53–66.

Rocha, C. T. M. da. & Amador, F. S. (2018). O teletrabalho: conceituação e questões para análise. Cad. EBAPE.BR, 16(1), 152-62, http://www.scielo.br/s cielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512018000100152&lng=pt&nrm=iso.

Slee, T. (2017). Uberização: A nova onda do trabalho precarizado. Elefante.

Uber (2018) Uber apresenta novas tecnologias para a mobilidade urbana no Brasil. https://www.uber.com/pt-BR/newsroom/uber-apresenta-novas-tecnologias-para-mobilidade-urbana-no-brasil/.

Uber (2020). Fatos e dados sobre a Uber. https://www.uber.com/pt-BR/newsroom/fatos-e-dados-sobre-uber/.

Vida/Trabalho (s.d.). Organização para Economia Cooperação e Desenvolvimento – OECD. https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/pt/quesitos/work-life-balance-pt/.

Vieira, Z. R. (2018). Trabalho e emancipação humana em Marx. Papel Social. 108 p.

Published

24/08/2021

How to Cite

CÂMARA, A. F.; FERREIRA, M. da L. A. . Flexible work and free time: Postmodern utopias. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 11, p. e98101119372, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19372. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19372. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences