Forage intake by heifers on alexander grass (Urochloa plantaginea (Link.) Hitch) fertilized with different levels of nitrogen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19922Keywords:
Bite mass; Chromium oxide; Grazing cycle; Nitrogen fertilization; Rotational stocking.Abstract
This work was conducted to study the efficiency of using nitrogen on Alexander Grass (Urochloa plantaginea (Link.) Hitch) through information about the characteristics of the pasture and forage intake of beef heifers. The experiment was carried out at the Federal University of Santa Maria (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, UFSM) in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, from January to April of 2014. The treatments consisted of doses of zero, 150, or 300 kg/ ha nitrogen (N) in the form of urea. The study used a rotational pasture method and 16 Angus heifers with a mean initial age and body weight (BW) of 15 months and 276 ± 17.4 kg, respectively. Forage intake was evaluated by treating two picketed test heifers with chromium oxide (Cr2O3) for eleven days as an external indicator of fecal production. The experimental design was completely randomized, and the measurements were repeated over time with three treatments and two repetitions per area. Crude protein content was 3.4% higher under 300 kg/ha nitrogen fertilization compared to 150 kg/ ha (18.7%). Independent of the N application rate, the heifers ingested 2.2 ± 0.09 kg DM 100/ kg BW of forage. Nitrogen fertilization of Alexander grass modified the structure of the pasture, increasing the quality and total production of the forage. Heifers pastured on Alexander grass fertilized with 300 kg/ha nitrogen harvested forage with higher levels of crude protein. The structural change in the canopy let the heifers reduce their consumption of forage at the end of the Alexander grass life cycle.
References
Bernardi A., Silva A.W.L., Barreta D. (2018). Meta-analytic study of response of nitrogen fertilization on perennial summer grasses. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 70 (02). doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-9501
Brâncio P.A., Euclides V.P.B., Nascimento J.R.D., Fonseca D.M., Almeida R.G., Macedo M.C.M., Barbosa R.A. (2003). Avaliação de três cultivares de Panicum maximum Jacq. sob pastejo: Comportamento ingestivo de bovinos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 32(5), 1045-1053. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982003000500003
Camargo D.G., Rocha M.G., Kozloski G.V., Elejalde D.G., Bremm C., Pötter L., Rosa A.T.N, Oliveira Neto R.A. (2009). Forage intake by supplemented lambs on pearl millet pasture. Ciência Rural, 39(2), 509-514. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782008005000083
Carvalho P.C.F., Trindade J.K., Silva S.C., Bremm C., Mezzalira J.C., Nabinger C., Martins R.S., Genro T.R.M., Gonçalves E.N, Amaral G.A., Gonda H.L, Poli C.H.E.C. (2009). Consumo de forragem por animais em pastejo: analogias e simulações em pastoreio rotativo. In: 25º Simpósio sobre Manejo da Pastagem - Intensificação de sistemas de produção animal em pastos. FEALQ, 2009.
Costa V.G., Rocha M.G., Pötter L., Roso D., Rosa A.T.N., Reis J. (2011). Comportamento de pastejo e ingestão de forragem por novilhas de corte em pastagens de milheto e papuã. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40(2), 251-259. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982011000200004
Eloy L.R., Rocha M.G., Pötter L., Salvador P.R., Stivanin S.C.B., Hampel V.S. (2014). Biomass flows and defoliation patterns of alexandergrass pasture grazed by beef heifers, receiving or not protein salt. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Science, 36(2), 123-128. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v36i2.21815
Euclides V.P.B., Macedo M.C.M., Oliveira M.P. (1992). Avaliação de diferentes métodos de amostragem para estimar o valor nutritivo de forragem sob pastejo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 21(4), 691-702.
Soares Filho C.V., Paris W., Cecato, U., Galbeiro S., Rego F.C.A. (2015). Estrutura da vegetação de pastagens e qualidade da forragem. In: III SIMPÓSIO DE PRODUÇÃO ANIMAL A PASTO. 55 – 88.
Fonseca L., Mezzalira J.C., Bremm C., Filho R.S.A., Gonda H.L., Carvalho P.C.F. (2012). Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livestock Science, 145(1-3), 205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.003
Forbes T.A.D. (1988). Researching the plant-animal interface: The investigation of ingestive behaviour of cows and sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 66(9), 2369-2379.
Garcia J.Á. (1995). Estructura del Tapiz de Praderas. INIA, Serie Tecnica 66.
Gastal F., Lemaire G. ( 2015). Defoliation, shoot plasticity, sward structure and herbage utilization in pasture: review of the underlying ecophysiological processes. Agriculture 5: 1146-1171. doi: 10.3390/agriculture5041146
Glienke C.L., Rocha M.G. , Pötter L., Roso D., Montagner D.b., Oliveira Neto R.A. (2016). Canopy structure, ingestive behavior and displacement patterns of beef heifers grazing warm-season pasturesArq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 68 (2). doi : 10.1590/1678-4162-8230
Heringer I., Moojen E.L. (2002). Potencial produtivo, alterações da estrutura e qualidade da pastagem de milheto submetida a diferentes níveis de nitrogênio. Ciência Rural, 31(2), 875-882. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982002000400010
Hodgson J. (1982). Ingestive behaviour. In: Herbage intake handbook. Hurley: British Grassland Society.
Hodgson J. (1990). Grazing management: science into practice. London: Longman Scientific & Technical.
Hodgson J., Clark D.A., Mitchell R.J. (1994). Foraging behavior in grazing animals and its impact on plant communities. In: Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. Based on the National Conference on Forage Quality. Lincon: American Society of Agronomy.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2014). Efetivo dos rebanhos. Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/temas.php?sigla=rs&tema=pecuaria2014
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2016). Censo Agropecuário Brasileiro – Resultados Preliminares. Retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=rs
IRVING L.J. (2015). Carbon assimilation, biomass partitioning and productivity in grasses. Agriculture 5: 1116-1134.
Jamieson W.S., Hodgson J. (1979). The effect of daily herbage allowance and sward characteristics upon the ingestive behavior of calves under strip-grazing management. Grass and Forage Science, 34(4), 261-271. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1979.tb01478.x
Janusckewicz E.R., Rapose E., Casagrande D.R., Ruggieri A.C. (2017). Estratégias de manejo do pastejo baseadas em ofertas de forragem alteram a estrutura de pastos de Brachiaria brizantha cultivar xaraés. Bol. Ind. Anim., Nova Odessa,74(3), 221-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.v74n3p221
Kozloski G.V., Flores E.M.M., Martins A.F. (1998). Use of Chromium Oxide in digestibility studies: variations of the results as a function of the measurement method. Journal Science Food Agriculture, 76(3), 373-376. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199803)76:3<373::AID-JSFA956>3.0.CO;2-Y
Laca E.A., Lemaire G. (2000). Measuring sward structure. In: Field and laboratory methods for grassland and animal production research. Wallingford: CAB International.
Laca E.A., Ungar E.D., Seligman N., Demment M.W. (1992). Effects of sward height and bulk density on bite dimensions of cattle grazing homogeneous swards. Grass and Forage Science, 47(1), 91-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1992.tb02251.x
L'Huillier P.J., Poppi D.P., Fraser T.J. (1986). Influence of structure and composition of ryegrass and prairie grass-white clover swards on the grazed horizon and diet harvested by sheep. Grass and Forage Science , 41(3), 259-267.
Maggioni D., Marques J.A., Rotta P.P., Zawadzki F., Ito R.H., Prado I.N. (2009). Ingestão de Alimentos. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 30(4), 963-974.
Moreno J.A. (1961). Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Secretaria da Agricultura.
NRC - National Research Council. (1996). Nutrient requirement of beef cattle. 7.ed. Washington: National Academy.
Paula C.C.L., Euclides V.P.B., Montagner D.B., Lempp B., Difante G.S., Carloto M.N. (2012). Estrutura do dossel, consumo e desempenho animal em pastos de capim-marandu sob lotação contínua. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.64, n.1, p.169-176. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352012000100024
Salvador P.R., Pötter L., Rocha M.G., Hundertmarck A.P., Sichonany M.J.O., Amaral Neto L.G., Negrini M., Moterle P.H. (2016). Sward structure and nutritive value of Alexander grass fertilized with nitrogen. Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88(1), 385-395. doi: 10.1080/02566702.1989.9648180
Silva D.R.G., Costa K.A.P., Faquin V., Oliveira I.P., Bernardes T.F. (2013) Doses e fontes de nitrogênio na recuperação das características estruturais e produtivas do capim-marandu. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v. 44, n. 1, p. 184-191.
Sollenberger L.E., Moore J.E., Quesenberry K.H., Beede P.T. (1987). Relationships between canopy botanical composition and diet selection in aeschynomene-limpograss pastures. Agronomy Journal, 79(6), 1049-1054. doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900060020x
Van Soest P.J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2 ed. London: Constock Publishing Associates.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Érica Dambrós de Moura; Luciana Pötter; José Fernando Piva Lobato; Marta Gomes da Rocha; Maria José de Oliveira Sichonany; Paulo Roberto Salvador; Tuani Lopes Bergoli; Lidiane Raquel Eloy; Amanda Carneiro Martini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
