Reliability of methods using a new graphic template to evaluate alveolar bone graft in cleft lip palate on radiographs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20068Keywords:
Cleft lip; Cleft Palate; Radiography; Bone transplantation.Abstract
This research aimed to evaluate the reliability of methods using a new graphic template to evaluate alveolar bone graft in cleft lip palate on radiographs. The sample consisted of 30 radiographs of individuals with bone grafts that were analyzed by two raters using SWAG and Chelsea, alveolar bone graft rating methods. The images were analyzed in PowerPoint, and second, introducing a template, that was designed in PowerPoint by the examiners. The inter-reliability and intra-reliability were determined using weighted Kappa statistics, with and without the template, in Jamovi 1.2 software. The determination of the intra-reliability was performed through the random selection of 10 radiographs. Inter-rater reliability in SWAG and Chelsea methods without the template, were moderate (0.574 and 0.519) and with was good (0.745 and 0.735) in both scales. Intra-rater reliability was good (0.710-0.610 and 0.634-0.639) in SWAG and Chelsea methods without the template, and including, this reliability was very good (1 and 0.846) in SWAG scale and good to very good (0.872 and 0.762) in Chelsea method. The use of a template to evaluate the images of alveolar bone grafts in both methods had a positive impact on the results, increasing inter-rater to good and intra-rater reliability to very good.
References
Altman, D. G. (1991). Pratical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 403-409.
Arangio, P., Marianetti, T. M., Tedaldi, M., Ramieri, V., & Cascone, P. (2008). Early secondary alveoloplasty in cleft lip and palate. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 19(5), 1364-1369.
Bergland, O., Semb, G., & Abyhlm, F. E. (1986). Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. The Cleft Palate Journal, 23, 175-205.
Botticelli, S., Kuseler, A., Marcusson, A., Molsted, K., Northolt, S. E., Cattaneo, P. M., & Pedersen, T. K. (2020). Do Infant cleft dimensions have an influence on occlusal relations? A subgroup analysis within a RCT of primary surgery in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. doi: 10.1177/1055665619875320
Boyne, P. J., & Sands, N. R. (1972). Secondary Bone graft of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. Journal of Oral Surgery, 30, 87-92.
Burg, M. L., Chai, Y., Yao, C. A., Magee, III. W., & Figueiredo, J.C. (2016). Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of isolated cleft palate. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, 1–16.
Calvo, A. M., Trindade-Suedam, I. K., Silva Filho, O. G., Carvalho, R. M., Faco, R. A. S., Ozawa, T. O., Cintra, F., Trindade Jr, A. S., & Trindade, I. E. K. (2014). Increase in age is associated with worse outcomes in alveolar bone grafting in patients with bilateral complete cleft palate. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(2), 380–382.
Dao, A. M., & Goudy, S. L. (2016). Cleft Palate Repair, Gingivoperiosteoplasty, and Alveolar Bone Grafting. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 24(4), 467–476.
Dempf, R., Teltzow, T., Kramer, F. J., & Hausamen, J. E. (2002). Alveolar bone grafting in patients with complete clefts: A comparative study between secondary and tertiary bone grafting. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 39(1), 18-25.
De Moura, P. M., Hallac, R., Kane, A., & Seaward, J. (2016). Improving the evaluation of alveolar bone grafts with cone beam computerized tomography. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 53(1), 57–63.
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weigth Kappa and intraclass correlation coeficiente as a measure of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613-661.
Hogan, L., Shand, J. M., Heggie, A. A., & Kilpatrick, N. (2003). Canine eruption into grafted alveolar clefts: a retrospective study. Australian Dental Journal, 48(2), 119-124.
Hynes, P. J., & Earley, M. J. (2003). Assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a modification of the Bergland grading system. The British association of Plastic surgeons, 56, 630-636.
Jia, Y. L., Fu, M. K., & Ma, L. (2006). Long term outcome of secondary bone grafting a report of 55 consecutively treated patients. European Journal of Orthodontics, 20(3), 299-307.
Kamperos, G., Theologie-Lygidakis, N., Tsiklakis, K., & Iatrou, I. (2020). A novel success scale for evaluating alveolar cleft repair using cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, 48(4), 391–398.
Kindelan, J. D., Nashed, R. R., & Bromige, M. R. (1997). Radiographic assessment of secondary autologus alveolar boné graft in cleft lip and palate patients. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 34, 195-198.
Mahajan, R., Ghildiyal, H., Khasgiwala, A., Muthukrishnan, G., & Kahlon, S. (2017). Evaluation of Secondary and Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on 66 Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Plastic Surgery (Oakv), 25(3), 194-199.
Nightingale, C., Witherow, H., Reid, F. D. A., & Edler, R. (2003). Comparative reproducibility of three methods of radiographic assessment of alveolar bone grafting. European Journal of Orthodontics, 25(1), 35–41.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. [e-book]. (1ª ed). Santa Maria: UAB/NTE/UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Pinheiro, F. H. S. L., Drummond, R. J., Frota, C. M., Bartzela, T. N., & Santos, P. B. (2020). Comparison of early and conventional autogenous secondary alveolar bone graft in children with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 23(4), 385–397.
Russel, K., Long, R. E., Daskalogiannakis, J., Mercado, A., Hataway, R., Semb, G., & Shaw, W. (2017). Reliability of the SWAG- The Standardized to assess grafts method for alveolar none grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 54(6), 680-686.
Stasiak, M., Wojtaszek-Słomińska, A., & Racka-Pilszak, B. (2020). A novel method for alveolar bone grafting assessment in cleft lip and palate patients: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations, 15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03505-z.
The jamovi project (2020). jamovi. (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
Vanderas, A. P. (1987). Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. The Cleft Palate Journal, 24, 216-225.
Yu, X., Guo, R., & Li, W. (2020). Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional radiologic evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting of clefts: a systematic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 130(4), 455–463.
Witherow, H., Cox, S., Jones, E., Carr, R., & Waterhouse, N. (2002). A new scale to assess radiographic success of secondary alveolar bone grafts. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 39(3), 255-260.
Worley, M., Patel, K. G., & Kilpatrick, L. A. (2018). Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinics in Perinatology, 45(4), 661–678.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rosa Helena Wanderley Lacerda; Isis de Araújo Ferreira Muniz; Alexandre Rezende Vieira; Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
