Object of learning in the teaching of simple harmonic motion: a case study using active methodology (ISLE type)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21137Keywords:
Learning Object; Active Methodologies; Simple harmonic movement.Abstract
In classroom, the Simple Harmonic Movement (SHM) is a content generally seen only in the form of expository classes and, for this reason, considered difficult to understand. In order to solve this problem, the following research question was asked: does the Learning Object (LO) contribute to the understanding of SHM, based on the ISLE Methodology approach? For that, simulations of SMH graphics were created with the aid of digital tools. This research was carried out at IFCE Campus Fortaleza and its main objective was to analyze the use of a LO in the discipline of Physics, aiming to assist the student in the simulation of graphs of the Simple Harmonic Movement (SHM), supported by the Active Methodology of the ISLE type, which proposes a Science Investigative Learning Environment. The students performed a pre-test in which they were to analyze and interpret the data of an SHM from its graph. Then, using the LO, the students explored the variables present in a periodic movement, being able to interact with it and visualizing the changes in the movement and in the graphs related to it. Finally, the students performed a post-test that consisted of, again, interpreting an SHM phenomenon based on its graph and producing new graphs representing other of its variables. The results point to an improvement in the understanding of the learners regarding the studied subject, indicating that the use of digital tools and active methodologies can contribute to a meaningful learning of Physics concepts, more specifically, of the SHM.
References
Amrani, D., & Paradis, P. (2010). Use of computer-based data acquisition to teach physics laboratories: case study-simple harmonic motion. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 4(3), 6.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1976). Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo (Vol. 3). México: Trillas.
Aykutlu, I., Bezen, S., & Bayrak, C. (2015). Teacher opinions about the conceptual challenges experienced in teaching physics curriculum topics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 390-405.
Behar, P. A. (2009). Modelos pedagógicos em educação a distância. Artmed Editora.
Borges, T. S., & Alencar, G. (2014). Metodologias ativas na promoção da formação crítica do estudante: o uso das metodologias ativas como recurso didático na formação crítica do estudante do ensino superior. Cairu em revista, 3(4), 119-143.
Braga, J. C. (2015). Objetos de aprendizagem, volume 2: metodologia de desenvolvimento. Santo André: Editora da UFABC.
Brasil. (2018). Base Nacional Comum Curricular: Ensino Médio. Brasília: MEC/Secretaria de Educação Básica.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard educational review.
Demaree, D., & Lin, Y. (2006, February). Assessing ISLE Labs as an Enhancement to Traditional Large‐Lecture Courses at the Ohio State University. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 818, No. 1, pp. 105-108). American Institute of Physics.
Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 54-98.
Etkina, E. (2015). Millikan award lecture: Students of physics—Listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices? American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT). http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4923432.
Karplus, R. (1977). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 14(2), 169–75.
Lawson, S. (2002). Examining the relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management. Nova southeastern university.
Lima, E. A. & Gaio, D. C. (2009). FÍSICA: a importância da experimentação associada ao lúdico.
Lima, L. A., Alonso, K. & Maciel, C. (2013). Análise da Qualidade em Objetos de Aprendizagem: reflexão sobre aspectos pedagógicos. In: Anais dos Workshops do Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação
Mazur, E. (2015). Peer instruction: a revolução da aprendizagem ativa. Penso Editora.
Michaelsen, L. K., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. X. (Eds.). (2011). Team-Based Learning: Small Group Learning's Next Big Step: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 116 (Vol. 103). John Wiley & Sons.
Moran, J. M. (2000). Novas tecnologias e mediação pedagógica. Papirus Editora.
Moreira, M. A. (2012). ¿ Al afinal, qué es aprendizaje siginificativo?. Qurriculum: revista de teoría, investigación y práctica educativa. La Laguna, Espanha. No. 25 (marzo 2012), p. 29-56.
Moreira, M. A., Caballero, M., & Rodríguez, M. (2012). Aprendizagem significativa: um conceito subjacente. 1997. http://www. if. ufrgs. br/~ moreira/apsigsubport. pdf Acesso, 2021-08-19.
Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just in time teaching.
Parnafes, O. (2010). When simple harmonic motion is not that simple: Managing epistemological complexity by using computer-based representations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 565-579.
Parreira, J. E. (2017). Aplicação e avaliação de uma metodologia de aprendizagem ativa (tipo ISLE) em aulas de Mecânica, em cursos de Engenharia. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 40. FapUNIFESP (SciELO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2017-0180. <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbe f/v40n1/1806-1117-rbef-40-01-e1401.pdf>.
Planinšič, G., & Etkina, E. (2015). Light-emitting diodes: Learning new physics. The Physics Teacher, 53(4), 210-216.http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4914558.
Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4).
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.
Rajibussalim, R., Rahmayani, E., & Irwandi, I. (2018, November). Utilising Investigative Science Learning Environment (ISLE) based STEM module for enhancing students’ understanding of Physics concepts. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1120, No. 1, p. 012086). IOP Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012086.
Ramos, P., Gianella, T. R., & Struchiner, M. (2010). A pesquisa baseada em design em artigos científicos sobre o uso de ambientes de aprendizagem mediados pelas tecnologias da informação e da comunicação no ensino de ciências. Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia, 3(1), 77-102.
Roche, J. (2002). Introducing simple harmonic motion. Physics Education, 37(6), 497. Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/6/306.
Silva, D. (2018). Metodologias Ativas como Subsídio para a Evolução de Conceitos de Física Moderna sob a Ótica da Aprendizagem Significativa. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Curso de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2018. http://pgecm.fortaleza.ifce.edu.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/FINAL-DIEGO-IFCE-Final.pdf.
Silva, D., Sales, G. L., & de Castro, J. B. (2018). A utilização do aplicativo Plickers como ferramenta na implementação da metodologia Peer Instruction. Revista Eletrônica Científica Ensino Interdisciplinar 4(12), 502-516.
Vick, V. C. (2018). The Effect of 7E Model Inquiry-based Labs on Student Achievement in Advanced Placement Physics: An Action Research Study (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina).
Marques, R. V., & Tenreiro, C. V. (2003). A formação inicial de professores e a didáctica das ciências como contexto de utilização do questionamento orientado para a promoção de capacidades de pensamento crítico. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 16(1), 231-252.
Wilsek, M. A. G., & Tosin, J. A. P. (2009). Ensinar e aprender ciências no ensino fundamental com atividades investigativas através da resolução de problemas. Portal da Educação do Estado do Paraná, 1686-8.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso-: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman editora.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 José Carlos Ferreira Bastos; Gilvandenys Leite Sales; Jeirla Alves Monteiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
