Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900

Keywords:

Endodontics; Simulated canals; WaveOne Gold; W-File.

Abstract

Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter.

References

Amaral, G., Lopes, H. P., Bombana, A. C., & Elias, C. (2004). Avaliação da capacidade de corte de limas tipo K de aço inoxidável e de Níquel-Titânio. JBE, J. Bras. Endod, 223-230.

Atmeh, A. R., & Watson, T. F. (2016). Root dentine and endodontic instrumentation: cutting edge microscopic imaging. Interface focus, 6(3), 20150113.

Bürklein, S., Hinschitza, K., Dammaschke, T., & Schäfer, E. (2012). Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. International endodontic journal, 45(5), 449-461.

Bürklein, S., Poschmann, T., & Schäfer, E. (2014). Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path. Journal of endodontics, 40(8), 1231-1234.

Calefi PHS, Osaki RB, Evedove NFD, Cruz VM, Andrade FB, Alcalde MP. (2020). Cyclic and torcional fatigue resistance of W File and X1 Blue file reciprocating instruments. Dental Press Endod.May-Aug;10(2):60-6.

Da Graça, E. V., & Paiva, S. S. M. (2020). Limas Reciprocantes No Canal Radicular. Cadernos De Odontologia do UNIFESO, 1(2).

De Menezes, S. E. A. C., Batista, S. M., Lira, J. O. P., & de Melo Monteiro, G. Q. (2017). Cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, ProDesign R and ProDesign Logic files in curved canals in vitro. Iranian endodontic journal, 12(4), 468.

Hülsmann, M., Gressmann, G., & Schäfers, F. (2003). A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments. International Endodontic Journal, 36(5), 358-366.

Keskin, C., Demiral, M., & Sarıyılmaz, E. (2018). Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 43(2).

Lim, Y. J., Park, S. J., Kim, H. C., & Min, K. S. (2013). Comparison of the centering ability of Wave· One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 21-25.

Maniglia-Ferreira, C., de Almeida Gomes, F., Ximenes, T., Neto, M. A. T., Arruda, T. E., Ribamar, G. G., & Herculano, L. F. G. (2017). Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. European journal of dentistry, 11(01), 041-047.

Metzger, Z., Solomonov, M., & Kfir, A. (2013). The role of mechanical instrumentation in the cleaning of root canals. Endodontic Topics, 29(1), 87-109.

Pelepenko LE, Zanin E, Langaro MC, Machado RL, Fornari VJ, Hartmann MSM. (2020). Resistência à fratura de instrumentos reciprocantes WaveOne-Gold e

W-File. Full Dent. Sci. 11(44).

Piazza, Gabriela Catarina et al. Avaliação do número de canais modelados com limas Prodesing M até sua fratura, simulado em blocos de resina acrílica. Revista Orbis Science, [s. l], p. 46-56, 2021.

Schäfer, E., & Vlassis, M. (2004). Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel–titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International endodontic journal, 37(4), 229-238.

Schäfer, E., Tepel, J., & Hoppe, W. (1995). Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion Part 2. instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of Endodontics, 21(10), 493-497.

Silva, E. J. N. L., Vieira, V. C. G., Tameirão, M. D. N., Belladonna, F. G., Neves, A. D. A., Souza, E. M., & De-Deus, G. (2016). Quantitative transportation assessment in curved canals prepared with an off-centered rectangular design system. Brazilian oral research, 30.

Taha, N. A., Ozawa, T., & Messer, H. H. (2010). Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals. Journal of endodontics, 36(3), 532-535.

Vallabhaneni, S., More, G. R., & Gogineni, R. (2012). Single file endodontics. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements, 4(2), 822-827.

Williamson, A. E., Sandor, A. J., & Justman, B. C. (2009). A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability. Journal of endodontics, 35(1), 107-109.

Yao, J. H., Schwartz, S. A., & Beeson, T. J. (2006). Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. Journal of endodontics, 32(1), 55-57.

Yoo, Y. S., & Cho, Y. B. (2012). A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 37(4), 220-227.

Downloads

Published

31/10/2021

How to Cite

CARVALHO, A. de M. de; SILVA, M. R. da; RODRIGUES, M. A.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, E. S. de; SOUZA, C. C.; ROSAS, C. A. P.; CARDOSO, R. M.; LIMOEIRO, A. G. da S. . Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file). Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 14, p. e207101421900, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences