Shear bond strength of orthodontic tubes bonded directly with composite resin reinforcement on the enamel surface

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23481

Keywords:

Orthodontic tube; Direct bonding; Resin reinforcement.

Abstract

To evaluate the shear bond strength and the fracture type of orthodontic tubes bonded directly with composite resin throughout the enamel surface. 30 bovine teeth were cut into 3 slices with 5 mm each and embedded in PVC pipes with acrylic resin exposing the buccal face. Subsequently, the teeth were submitted to conventional bonding techniques. Natural Ortho resin was applied for direct bonding of Edgewise Standard orthodontic tubes (Morelli®) and light-cured for 20s. A different viscosity resin was chosen and light-cured for 40s to reinforce the tube surface. The samples were divided into the following groups: Orthodontic tube with direct bonding without reinforcement (CONTROL), Tube with Natural Ortho resin + Reinforcement (NO + NO), Tube with Natural Ortho resin + Reinforcement with Flow resin (NO + FL). These were submitted to shear bond strength; immediate and 1-year aging fracture analysis after simulated through thermocycling. In the shear bond strength test, the group of orthodontic tubes that were directly bonded with Natural Ortho resin and reinforced (NO + NO) showed greater strength results after 24 hours and 1 year with values of (p=0.0225) and (p=0.0273). It was statistically differentto the NO + FL and CONTROL reinforced groups. In the fracture analysis, the NO +NO group was classified immediately as composite cohesive, and mixed failure after aging by thermocycling. The addition of a composite resin layer on the surface of the directly bonded orthodontic tube improved bond strength. The reinforcement must be carried out in regular consistency and the use of Flow resin is not indicated.

References

Ahmed, T., Rahman, N. A., & Alam, M. K. (2018). Assessment of in vivo bond strength studies of the orthodontic bracket-adhesive system: A systematic review. European journal of dentistry, 12(4), 602–609.

Baer P. N., & Cocarro J. Gingival Enlargement Coincident With Orthodontic Therapy. J. Periodontol. 35:436–439. Al-Anezi S. A. (2015). The effect of orthodontic bands or tubes upon periodontal status during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment. The Saudi dental journal, 27(3), 120–124.

Vercelino, C. R. M. P., Pinzan. A., Gurgel, J. A., Bramante, F. S., & Pinzan, L. M, (2011) In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct bonding of orthodontic molar tubes. Dental Press J Orthod.16(3):60.e1-8.

Faria, R., Leite, F. P. P., Bottino, M. A., Araújo Jej, D. E. Efeito Da Termociclagem Sobre A Resistência De União Entre Uma Cerâmica E Um Cimento Resinoso.PCL 2004; 6(34):576-81.

D'Amario, M., Campidoglio, M., Morresi, A. L., Luciani, L., Marchetti, E., & Baldi, M. (2010). Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength between dual- cured resin cements and zirconium-oxide ceramics. Journal of oral science, 52(3), 425–430.

Flores-Mir C. (2011). Bonded molar tubes associated with higher failure rate than molar bands. Evidence-based dentistry, 12(3), 84.

Godard, M., Deuve, B., Lopez, I., Hippolyte, M. P., & Barthélemi, S. (2017). Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel. International orthodontics, 15(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.003

Keim, R. G., Gottlieb, E. L., Nelson, A. H., & Vogels, D. S., 3rd (2008). 2008 JCO Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures. Part 2: breakdowns of selected variables. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, 42(12), 699–727.

Limberger, K. M., Westphalen, G. H., Menezes, L. M., & Medina-Silva, R. (2011). Cytotoxicity of orthodontic materials assessed by survival tests in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 27(5), e81–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.001

Liu, Y. N., Wang, L. K., Liu, S. S., Li, W. F., & Wang, H. F. (2018). Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 98(28), 2275–2278.

Millett, D. T., Glenny, A. M., Mattick, R. C., Hickman, J., & Mandall, N. A. (2016). Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 10(10), CD004485.

Millett, D. T., Mandall, N. A., Mattick, R. C., Hickman, J., & Glenny, A. M. (2017). Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2(2), CD008236. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008236.pub3

Morresi, A. L., D’Amaro, M, Capogreco, M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, et al, Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.2014;29: 295–308.

Murray, P. G., Millett, D. T., & Cronin, M. Bonded molar tubes: a survey of their use by specialist orthodontists. Journal Orthodontist. 2012 Jun;39(2):129-35. 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000016.

Nazir, M., Walsh, T., Mandall, N. A., Matthew, S., Fox, D. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. J Orthod. 2011 Jun;38(2):81-9. 10.1179/14653121141308.

Oeiras, V. J., Silva, V. A., Azevedo, L. A., Lobato, V. S., & Normando, D. (2016). Survival analysis of banding and bonding molar tubes in adult patients over a 12-month period: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Brazilian oral research, 30(1), e136.

Pandis, N., Christensen, L., & Eliades, T. (2005). Long-term clinical failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer. The Angle orthodontist, 75(6), 1000–1002.

Pandis, N., Polychronopoulou, A., & Eliades, T. (2006). A comparative assessment of the failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer and conventional acid-etching. World journal of orthodontics, 7(1), 41–44.

Pinzan-Vercelino, C. R., Pinzan, A., Gurgel, A., Bramante, F. S., & Pinzan, L.M. (2011). In-vitro evaluation of an alternative method to bond molar tubes. J App Oral Sci, 19:41-6.

Purmal, K., & Sukumaran, P. (2010). Shear bond strengths of buccal tubes. Australian orthodontic journal, 26(2), 184–188.

Sadowsky, C, & BeGole, E. A. Long-term effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health. Am J Orthod. 1981 Aug;80(2):156-72. 10.1016/0002- 9416(81)90216-5.

Sharma, T., Phull, T. S., Rana, T., & Kumar, V. (2014). Expressly fabricated molar tube bases: enhanced adhesion. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research

: JCDR, 8(6), ZD16–ZD18

Wadia, R. (2019). Composite resin roughness anda biofilms. British Dental Journal, Dec; 227 (12): 104.

Zachrisson B. U., & Zachrisson S. Caries Incidence And Oral Hygiene During Orthodontic Treatment. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 79:394–401.

Walsh, L. J., & Healey, D. L. (2019). Prevention and caries risk management in teenage and orthodontic patients. Australian dental journal, 64 Suppl 1, S37–S45.

Downloads

Published

11/12/2021

How to Cite

RIFANE, T. O. .; MAIA , Ítalo H. T. .; OLIVEIRA, A. S. de .; RODRIGUES , R. E. A. .; SILVESTRE, F. A. .; FARRAPO , M. T. .; SENA , N. J. C. de .; MARÇAL, F. F. .; BARROSO, L. F. .; MEDEIROS, S. T. C. B.; FEITOSA , V. P. Shear bond strength of orthodontic tubes bonded directly with composite resin reinforcement on the enamel surface. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 16, p. e195101623481, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23481. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23481. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences