Cross-sectional study with radiographic and documental data of patients submitted to Cone Morse implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.24123Keywords:
Dental Implants; Radiographic Image Interpretation; Records.Abstract
The aim of this study was to carry out a descriptive cross-sectional survey based on radiographic examinations and information from medical records of patients who underwent installation of Cone Morse Screw Platinum® implants in a private clinic in the city of Curitiba, PR, Brazil. The medical records and radiographic examinations of patients aged 18 years or over, of both genders, treated in the period between February 2015 and June 2019 were included. Only those with a minimum installation time of six months and who were s medical records were complete. The data collected were: gender (male or female), age (in years), time the implant was installed (in months), arch (maxilla or mandible) and region (anterior or posterior), implant position in relation to height of the marginal bone crest (infraosseous, at the bone level, or supraosseous). A total of 27 patients (13 men and 14 women) and 131 implants were evaluated. The median age was 59 years and implant placement time was 15 months. As for the arch, 70.2% were in the maxilla and the posterior region had a frequency of 63.3%. A total of 88 implants were in the infraosseous position. It can be concluded that most of the evaluated implants were, in relation to the marginal bone crest, in an infraosseous position, which is considered the ideal. The maxilla, both anteriorly and posteriorly, was the most rehabilitated, which may indicate the importance of the aesthetic issue for the patients analyzed here.
References
Brånemark, P. I., Hansson, B. O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindström, J., Hallén, O., & Ohman, A. (1977). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Supplementum, 16, 1–132.
Belbasis, L., & Bellou, V. (2018). Introduction to epidemiological Studies. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1793, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7868-7_1
Bolle, C., Gustin, M. P., Fau, D., Boivin, G., Exbrayat, P., & Grosgogeat, B. (2016). Soft tissue and marginal bone adaptation on platform-switched implants with a morse cone connection: a histomorphometric study in dogs. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 36(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2254
Cassetta, M., Di Mambro, A., Giansanti, M., & Brandetti, G. (2016). The survival of Morse Cone-connection implants with platform switch. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 31(5), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4225
Castro, D. S., Araujo, M. A., Benfatti, C. A., Araujo, C., Piattelli, A., Perrotti, V., & Iezzi, G. (2014). Comparative histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of marginal bone resorption around external hexagon and Morse cone implants: an experimental study in dogs. Implant Dentistry, 23(3), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000089
Clark, D., & Levin, L. (2019). In the dental implant era, why do we still bother saving teeth?. Dental Traumatology:, 35(6), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12492
Degidi, M., Perrotti, V., Shibli, J. A., Novaes, A. B., Piattelli, A., & Iezzi, G. (2011). Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants. Journal of Periodontology, 82(5), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100450
Degidi, M., Daprile, G., & Piattelli, A. (2017). Marginal bone loss around implants with platform-switched Morse-cone connection: a radiographic cross-sectional study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(9), 1108–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12924
Flanagan D. (2017). Bite force and dental implant treatment: a short review. Medical Devices), 10, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S130314
Howe, M. S., Keys, W., & Richards, D. (2019). Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 84, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008
Hudieb, M. I., Wakabayashi, N., Abu-Hammad, O. A., & Kasugai, S. (2019). Biomechanical effect of an exposed dental implant's first thread: a three-dimensional finite element analysis study. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 25, 3933–3940. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913186
Hultin, M., Svensson, K. G., & Trulsson, M. (2012). Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl 6), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x
Kfouri, F. A. (2013). Versatilidade clínica de componentes protéticos cone morse. Revista Eletrônica da Faculdade de Odontologia da FMU, 2(2), 1-4.
Klinge, B., Lundström, M., Rosén, M., Bertl, K., Klinge, A., & Stavropoulos, A. (2018). Dental implant quality register-a possible tool to further improve implant treatment and outcome. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29 (18), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13268
Korfage, A., Raghoebar, G. M., Meijer, H., & Vissink, A. (2018). Patients' expectations of oral implants: a systematic review. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 11 (1), S65–S76.
Koutouzis, T., Neiva, R., Nair, M., Nonhoff, J., & Lundgren, T. (2014). Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29(5), 1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3411
Kopp, G. (2011). Manual cirúrgico Kopp implantes. https://issuu.com/implantkopp/docs/04-manual-cirurgico. Acessado em: 06/2021.
Linkevicius, T., Puisys, A., Linkevicius, R., Alkimavicius, J., Gineviciute, E., & Linkeviciene, L. (2020). The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(4), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12903
Mangano, C., Mangano, F., Shibli, J. A., Tettamanti, L., Figliuzzi, M., d'Avila, S., Sammons, R. L., & Piattelli, A. (2011). Prospective evaluation of 2,549 morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data. Journal of Periodontology, 82(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100243
Mangano, C., Iaculli, F., Piattelli, A., & Mangano, F. (2015). Fixed restorations supported by morse-taper connection implants: a retrospective clinical study with 10-20 years of follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(10), 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12439
Mericske-Stern, R., & Worni, A. (2014). Optimal number of oral implants for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 7 (2), S133–S153.
Merheb, J., Graham, J., Coucke, W., Roberts, M., Quirynen, M., Jacobs, R., & Devlin, H. (2015). Prediction of implant loss and marginal bone loss by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 30(2), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3604
Novaes, A. B., Jr, Barros, R. R., Muglia, V. A., & Borges, G. J. (2009). Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. The Journal of Oral Implantology, 35(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336-35.1.18
Palinkas, M., Nassar, M. S., Cecílio, F. A., Siéssere, S., Semprini, M., Machado-de-Sousa, J. P., Hallak, J. E., & Regalo, S. C. (2010). Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Archives of Oral Biology, 55(10), 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016
Pessoa, R. S., Sousa, R. M., Pereira, L. M., Neves, F. D., Bezerra, F. J., Jaecques, S. V., Sloten, J. V., Quirynen, M., Teughels, W., & Spin-Neto, R. (2017). Bone remodeling around implants with external hexagon and morse-taper connections: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 19(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12437
Pita, M. S., Anchieta, R. B., Barão, V. A., Garcia, I. R., Jr, Pedrazzi, V., & Assunção, W. G. (2011). Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 22(6), 2327–2331. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318232a706
Romanos, G. E., & Javed, F. (2014). Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 41(9), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12189
Schmitt, C. M., Nogueira-Filho, G., Tenenbaum, H. C., Lai, J. Y., Brito, C., Döring, H., & Nonhoff, J. (2014). Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 102(2), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34709
Silva, R. M. M. da, Rolim, A. K. A., Delgado, L. A., Sousa, J. T., Ribeiro, R. A., Rodrigues, R. de Q. F., & Rodrigues, R. A. (2020). Cone morse x external hexagon, advantages and disadvantages in the clinical aspect: literature review. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e454973947. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3947
Tang, C. L., Zhao, S. K., & Huang, C. (2017). Features and advances of Morse taper connection in oral implant. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 52(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.01.014
Valente, M. L., de C., D. T., Shimano, A. C., Lepri, C. P., & dos Reis, A. C. (2015). Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods. Clinical Oral Investigations, 19(8), 1861–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1417-4
Veríssimo, A. H., Souza, J. A. N. de., Oliveira, T. A. de., Gonçalves, A. G., Afonso, F. A. C. ., & Souza Júnior, F. A. de . (2021). Oral rehabilitation with dental implant and immediate loading by guided surgery: case report. Research, Society and Development, 10(1), e4810110854. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.10854
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rafaela Mendes Araújo; Fernanda Carolina Troetsch Kopp; Gino Kopp; Jeferson Luis de Oliveira Stroparo; Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo; João César Zielak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
