Sustainable Development Indicators: an analysis in the territory of the Eastern Cariri Paraibano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25827Keywords:
Family agriculture; Development; Sustainability and the environment.Abstract
Promoting an integrated system to measure economic, social and environmental performance is fundamental to assist the management of rural establishments, being able to point out the endogenous potential to achieve sustainable development. This work has as main objective to analyze the sustainable regional development in the Territory of Cariri Oriental Paraibano.The theoretical basis is the work of Agenda 21, Ferreira et. Al. (2012), May (2010), Baroni (2001), Wanderley (2001), Mol (2000), among others. Data were collected in the reports of the municipal departments of agriculture and development, in the report of ptdrs - Territorial Plan for Sustainable Rural Development of The Eastern Cariri, in the documents of the Secretariat of Territorial Development – SDT linked to the Ministry of Agrarian Development - MDA and IBGE. The basic justification is that in recent years the territory has benefited from sustainable development policies, focused on family production, such as Law 11.947/2009 and movements related to sustainable agroecological production. The hypothesis that family farming in the territory resembles employer's agriculture is validated as production planning is based on the market and not family consumption at the same time that the labor, property and enjoyment of the land has in its essence the family, the activity is verified as a result of the family effort and promoting economic sustainability, environmental equity and social responsibility. The data show that the municipalities bordered by BRs and/or have non-essentially rural activities, have the highest HDI, showing that despite the majority of the labor occupied in the territory is linked to family agriculture, this is not able to generate economic sustainability, despite being the best bet for environmental sustainability.
References
Amaral Filho, J. (1996). Desenvolvimento regional endógeno em um ambiente federalista. In: Planejamento e políticas públicas. Brasília, IPEA (14).
Antonio A. M. J., & Zacarias X. de B (2020). Utilização Racional de Água em Cervejaria Brasileira. Energia na Agricultura 35(2), 287-294,
Baroni, M. (1992). Ambiguidade e deficiência do conceito de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Revista de administração de Empresas, 32(2), 14-24.
Brasil, Câmara dos Deputados (2018). Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (1992.: Rio de Janeiro). Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados, centro de documentação e informação, coordenação de biblioteca.
Brasil, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário MDA – (2010), Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Territorial – SDT: documento referencias para a dinamização econômica nos territórios rurais.
Carvalho, P. G. M. de. & Barcellos, F. C. (2010). Economia do meio ambiente: teoria e pratica / Peter H. May (2a ed.), Elsevier.
Dryzek, J. (1997), The Politicsofthe Earth, Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, et al. (2012). Indicadores de sustentabilidade em agroecossistemas. Informe agropecuário, 33(271), 12-25.
Franzluebbers, A.J. (2021). Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Calculated from depth distribution. Soil Sci.Sac. Am J. (85), 158-171.
Gil, A. C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. (6a ed.), Ediitora Atlas SA.
Gliessman, S. R. (2001). Agroecologia: processos ecológicos em agricultura sustentável, (6a ed.), Ed. Universidade/UFRGS.
Gonçalves, J. S., & Souza, S. A. M. (2018) Agricultura familiar: limites do conceito e evolução do crédito. Artigos: políticas públicas. Instituto de Economia Agrícola.
Hajer, M. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
May, P. H. (2010) Economia do meio ambiente. Teoria e prática / Peter H. May (6a ed.), Elsevier.
Mcqueen, D., & Noak, H. (1998). Healt promotion indicators: current status, inssues and problems. Health Promotion.
Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and informations systems for sustainabled evelopment. Hartland Four Corners: The Sustainability Institute.
Mol, A. & Sonnenfeld, D. (2000), EcologicalModernisationAtoundthe World: Na Introdution, Environmental Politics.
Leopoldo, N. C. M., et al. (2020). Vulnerabilidade ambiental do Parque Nacional das Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba – PNNRP. Gaia Scientia.
OECD (1993) - Organization For Economic Cooperation and Development - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews, a synthesis reportby the grupo on thestate of theenviroment. Paris.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., &Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica.
Rafael Felipe R. R. M. Cavalcanti, J. E. da S. & Isabel L. F. (2021). “Water Cost Of Beer Production: A Comparative Economic Analysis in Brazil”, international journal of development research, 11, (02), 44856-44860.
Rafael Felipe R. R. M. Cavalcanti, J. E. da S. & Isabel L. F. (2021). “Custos Da Água Na Produção De Cerveja: Uma Análise Econômica Comparativa” ,Resarch, Society and Development .10.33448/rsd-v.10i2.12765.
Resumo Executivo, Plano Territorial de Desenvolvimento Rural – PTDRS (2010). Território do Cariri Oriental-PB.
Silva, E. M. S. et al. (2016) Sustentabilidade e responsabilidade social ambiental: o uso indiscriminado de água. Revista Maiêtica, Indoial, 4(1), 57-66.
Silva, J. E. da. (2015). Análise da Viabilidade econômica da agricultura familiar dos arrendatários do DNOCS no Açude de Boqueirão-PB, Novas Edições Acadêmicas.
Tsur, Y. (2005) Economic aspects of irrigation water pricing. Canadian Resources Jiural, 30(1), 31-466,USGS.gov./Science for a changing world. Consultadoem 27/08/2021.
Wanderley, N. (2001). Raízes históricas do campesinato brasileiro. In: Tedesco (Org.) Agricultura familiar: realidades e perspectivas. Passo Fundo- RS: UPF, 405 p.
Zhiwei, W., et al. (2020). Streamflow Reconstruction and Variation Characteristic Analysis of the Ganjiang River in China for the Past 515 Years. NDPI. Sustenability.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 José Erivaldo da Silva; Maria de Fátima Martins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
