Bibliometric analysis on university management approaches in publications on the Web of Science platform between 1945 and 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i2.26023Keywords:
University Management; Efficiency; Satisfaction; Public Sector.Abstract
Social and economic transformations added to governmental measures registered in norms and decrees have stimulated discussions in the public sphere, aiming at greater efficiency in actions, improvements in the provision of educational services and fostering innovation. In this sense, university management becomes the focus of modernization and the search for greater user satisfaction with the provision of public services. On these issues, this work aims to analyze the directions of research aimed at university management, registered as scientific articles on the Web of Science platform, between the period from 1945 to 2020. Methodologically, it is a research with a quantitative approach, based on the from bibliometric analysis on the Web of Science platform, covering the period of consultation from 1945 to 2020. As a result, publication rates, specificities of more relevant research in the area of university management, most cited authors and occurrences of words are recorded. It is concluded that, given the most relevant studies available on the Web of Science, there are no integrated approaches that involve issues such as efficiency, user satisfaction and innovation in higher education management, especially considering the Brazilian public sector.
References
Arocena, R., Göransson, B. & Sutz, J. (2014). Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the “developmental university”. Technology in Society, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.10.004
Bassi, F. (2018). Dynamic clustering to evaluate satisfaction with teaching at university. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1070-1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2017-0162
Bayuo, B. B., Chaminade, C., Göransson, B. (2020). Unpacking the role of universities in the emergence, development and impact of social innovations – A systematic review of the literature. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 155(1), 1-3. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120030
Brasil. Decreto nº 5.378, de 23 de fevereiro de 2005. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2005/Decreto/D5378.htm
Brasil. Decreto nº 9.094, de 17 de julho de 2017. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2017/Decreto/D9094.htm
Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). https://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_superior/censo_superior/documentos/2019/censo_da_educacao_superior_2018-notas_estatisticas.pdf
Brasil. Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. http://www.planalto.gov.br/Ccivil_03/leis/L9394.htm
Brasil. Lei nº 13.168, de 6 de outubro de 2015. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13168.htm
Brasil. Lei nº 13.460, de 26 de junho de 2017. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/Lei/L13460.htm
Csomós, G. (2020). Introducing recalibrated academic performance indicators in the evaluation of individuals’ research performance: A case study from Eastern Europe. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101073
Frey, K. (2000). Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 21(1), 211 – 260. http://www.ipea.gov.br/ppp/index.php/PPP/article/viewFile/89/158
Huisman, J. & Currie, J. (2004). Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water?. Higher Education, 48(1), 529–551, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046725.16936.4c
Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
Knott, J. H. & Payne, A. A. (2004). The impact of state governance structures on managemente and performance of public organizations: a study of higher education institutions. Jornal of policy Analysis and Management, 23(1), 13-30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3326188
Lacy, F. J. & Sheehan, B. A. (1997). Job satisfaction among academic staff: An international perspective. Higher Education, 34(1), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003019822147
Li, Y., Gu, Y. & Liu, C. (2018). Prioritising performance indicators for sustainable construction and development of university campuses using an integrated assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202(1), 959-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.217
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2011). The process of change in university management: from the "ivory tower" to entrepreneurialism. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 33(1), 124-149. https://www.rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/287
Muntean, M., Bologa, A., Bologa, R. & Florea, A. (2011). The use of multidimensional models to increase the efficiency of management support systems. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 5(8), 1-11. https://www.naun.org/multimedia/NAUN/ijmmas/17-207.pdf
O'kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W. & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.003
Oliveira, E. F. T. de. (2018). Estudos métricos da informação no Brasil: indicadores de produção, colaboração, impacto e visibilidade. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica. 184 p. https://www.marilia.unesp.br/Home/Publicacoes/estudos-metricos-da-informacao-no-brasil---e-book.pdf
Pereira, R. S., Santos, I. C., Oliveira, K. D. S. & Leão, N. C. A. (2019). Metanálise como instrumento de pesquisa: Uma revisão sistemática dos estudos bibliométricos em Administração. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 20(5), 2019. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-69712019000500301&lng=en&nrm=iso
Pop-vasileva, A., Baird, K. & Blair, B. (2014). The Work-related Attitudes of Australian Accounting Academics. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 23(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.824689
Prodanov, C. C. & Fretas, E. C. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas da pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. 2. ed. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale.
Rafalski, J. C. & Andrade, A. L. (2015). Home-Office: Aspectos Exploratórios do Trabalho a partir de Casa. Trends in Psychology, 23 (2), 431-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.9788/TP2015.2-14
Reis, F. P. G. dos. & Cunha, D. O. (2010). Políticas públicas & desenvolvimento regional. Campina Grande: EDUEPB.
Sabau, G., Munten, M., Bologa, A., Bologa, R. & Surcel, T. (2009). An Evaluation Framework for Higher Education ERP Systems. Wseas Transactions on Computers, 8(11), 1-10. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/computers/2009/29-795.pdf
Soares, J. R., Bordin, R. & Rosa, R. S. (2019). Indicadores de gestão e de qualidade nas instituições federais de ensino superior brasileiras - 2009-2016. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 25(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.250.95100
Ylijoki, O., Hans, M. (2003). Conflicting Time Perspectives in Academic Work. Time & Society, 12(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X03012001364
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Allan Gustavo Freire da Silva; Laís Karla da Silva Barreto; Marcelo Victor Alves Bila Queiroz; Rômulo Andrade de Souza Neto; Emilia Suitberta de Oliveira Trigueiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.