Performance in written language and arithmetic: relationship between screening (subitems of the Neupsilin-Inf test) and assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27196Keywords:
Child language; Learning disabilities; Triage; Diagnosis, differential; Language tests.Abstract
Introduction: mastering writing and performing well in arithmetic are highly valued in our culture and a factor that interferes in people's financial capacity and, therefore, in their quality of life. Early detection of children at risk for writing/arithmetic language disorders is therefore necessary. Objective: relating performance on a written language/arithmetic screening test and the result of the detailed assessment of these skills. Method: twenty-five children (10 females; mean age of 8.7 years and standard deviation of 1.1) from a public school participated in the study. These were submitted to two stages of evaluation, the first being a screening of oral/written language and arithmetic skills (dimensions of the Neupsilin Child, ou ou Neupsilin-Inf test, test) and, in the second stage, a detailed assessment of reading, writing and arithmetic (use of standardized tests ). For statistical inference, Fisher's exact test was used (α = 0.05). Results: the association was significant between the oral/written language screening and the results in the reading and writing tests, that is, the children who failed in these dimensions of the screening were the children with alterations in reading and writing tasks, however, between the result of the arithmetic skills screening test and the performance on the arithmetic test, the association was not significant. Conclusion: the screening test used in this study was effective in selecting children with reading or writing problems, but it was not the best way to assess the arithmetic skill.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP): Committee on Children with Disabilities (2001). Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics, 108:192-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.192
Avila, C. R. B. (2004). Consciência fonológica. In: Ferreira, L. P.; Befi-Lopes, D. M. & Limongi, S. C. O. (org.). Tratado de fonoaudiologia (pp. 815-824). São Paulo: Editora Roca.
Barrera, S. D. & Santos, M. J. (2016). Produção escrita de narrativas: influência de condições de solicitação. Educar em Revista, 62, 69- 85. doi: 10.1590/0104-4060.48026
Brasil - Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (Inep) [homepage on the Internet]. (2017). Sistema de Avaliação da Educação Básica – SAEB. Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/ultimas-noticias/389-ensino-medio-2092297298/68271-apenas-1-6-dos-estudantes-do-ensino-medio-tem-niveis-de-aprendizagem-adequados-em-portugues.
Byrne, B. & Frielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 313-321. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.313
Carso, H. V.; Piccolo, L. R.; Miná, C. S. & SALLES, J. F. (2017). Coleção ANELE – Avaliação da leitura de palavras e pseudopalavras e da compreensão de leitura. São Paulo: Vetor Editora.
Ellis, A. W. (1995). Leitura, escrita e dislexia: Uma análise cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Goff, D. A.; Pratt, C. & Ong, B. (2005). The relations between children‟s reading comprehension, working memory, language skills and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18(7), 583-616. doi: 10.1007/s11145-004-7109-0
Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(54), 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
Medina, G. B. K.; Portes, C. P.; Pereira, N. S.; Sodré, D. A.; Kruszielski, L. & Guimarães, S. R. K. (2019). Desempenho de leitores com dislexia no instrumento NEUPSILIN-inf em comparação a leitores sem transtorno de leitura. Revista PsicoFAE: Pluralidades em Saúde Mental, 7(2), 87-98.
Moojen, S.; Lamprecht, R.; Santos, R. M. Freitas, G. M.; Brodacz, R.; Siqueira, M.; Costa, A. C. & Guarda, E. (2003). Consciência Fonológica: instrumento de avaliação sequencial (CONFIAS). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
Morais, J.; Kolinsky, R.; Alégria, J. & Scliar-Cabral, L. (1998). Alphabetic literacy and psychological structure. Letras de Hoje, 33(4), 61-79.
Pedroza R. L. S. & Maia C. M. F. (2021). Atuação de psicólogas escolares em contexto de pandemia: análise de práticas profissionais. In: Fauston-Negreiros, B. O. F. (org). Onde está a psicologia escolar no meio da pandemia? (pp. 91-117). São Paulo: Editora Pimenta.
Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Pires, A. B. C. & Simão, A. N. P. (2017). Avaliação de crianças com indicação de dificuldades de aprendizagem pelo instrumento NEUPSILIN-Inf. Revista de Psicopedagogia, 34(104), 148-57.
Rapp B, Fischer-Baum S & Miozzo M. (2015). Modality and morphology: what we write may not be what we say. Psychological Science, 26(6), 892-902. doi: 10.1177/0956797615573520
Salles J. F.; Fonseca R. P.; Rodrigues C. C.; Mello, C. B.; Barbosa T. & Miranda M. C. (2011). Desenvolvimento do Instrumento de Avaliação Neuropsicológica Breve Infantil NEUPSILIN-INF. Psico-USF, 16(3), 297-305. doi: 10.1590/S1413-82712011000300006
Salles J. F.; Sbicigo J. B.; Machado W. L.; Miranda M. C. & Fonseca R. P. (2014). Análise Fatorial Confirmatória do Instrumento de Avaliação Neuropsicológica Breve Infantil - NEUPSILIN – Inf. Psico-USF, 19(1), 119-130. doi: 10.1590/S1413-82712014000100012
Salles, J. F. & Parente, M. A. M. P. (2002). Processos Cognitivos na Leitura de Palavras em Crianças: Relações com Compreensão e Tempo de Leitura. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 15(2), 321-331. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722002000200010
Santana, A. N.; Roazzi, A. & Melo, M. R. A. (2020). Os três componentes executivos básicos e o desempenho matemático escolar. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, 101(259), 649-669. doi: 10.24109/2176-6681.rbep.101i259.4137
Schneider, W., Roth, E. & Ennemoser, M. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia: A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 284 – 295. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.284
Seabra, A. G. & Capovilla, F. C. (2013). Prova de escrita sob ditado: (versão reduzida). In: Seabra, A. G. & Capovilla, F. C. Avaliação neuropsicológica cognitiva: leitura, escrita e aritmética. São Paulo: Editora Memnon.
Shulman, K. L. (2000). Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(6), 548-561. doi: 10.1258/096914106776179818.
Zamo R. S. & Salles J. F. (2013). Perfil neuropsicológico no Neupsilin-Inf de crianças com dificuldades de leitura. Psico, 44(2), 204-214.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Estela Bianconi Casteli ; Júlia de Paula Oliveira; Ângela Cristina Pontes-Fernandes; Marita Iannazzo Ferretti; Marisa Tomoe Hebihara Fukuda; Patricia Aparecida Zuanetti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.