Value of pre anesthetic consultation on patients owner’s perception about the anesthesiologist

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27788

Keywords:

Anesthesia; Questionnaire; Knowledge.

Abstract

Veterinary anesthesiology is an area on the rise within veterinary medicine, so understanding the role of the anesthesiologist is extremely important. The aim of this study is to evaluate the importance of pre-anesthetic consultation in the owner’s perception of the anesthesiologist and his knowledge about this professional as well as his functions and responsibilities. A questionnaire was applied to the owners of the animals attended at HCV/UFPel who would undergo consultation and pre-evaluation anesthetic, the participants were divided into a control group where the questionnaire was applied before any contact with the anesthetist and the test group where the questionnaire was applied after the pre-anesthetic consultation and evaluation of the patient by the anesthesiologist. Altogether, 63 questionnaires were applied, majority answered by women. Both study groups agreed on the need for a pre-anesthetic consultation, as well as both felt safer. Still, the control group showed to have less knowledge about the number of people involved in a surgical procedure, while the test group proved to be less comfortable knowing that the procedure would be performed in a hospital with an anesthesiologist veterinarian. It is concluded that the pre-anesthetic consultation is necessary and provides greater safety to the responsible in relation to the procedure of your pet but it is necessary to improve this in a better way inform and clarify the functions, responsibilities and importance of this professional to the responsible.

References

Bhattarai, B.; Kandel, S. & Adhikari, N. (2012). Perception about the role of anesthesia and anesthesiologist among the paramedical staffs: perspective from a medical college in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 38(2):51-54.

Brasil. (2018). Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução nº 2.174/2017 de 27 de feveiro de 2018. Dispõe sobre a prática do ato anestésico e revoga a resolução CFM nº 1.802/2006. https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/resolucoes/BR/2017/2174

Brasil. (2006). Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução nº 1.802/2006 de 01 de novembro de 2006. Dispõe sobre a prática do ato anestésico. https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/resolucoes/BR/2006/1802

Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. (2012). Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiolo¬gists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 116:522–538.

De Oliveira, K. F.; Clivatti, J. & Munechika, M., et al. (2011). What do patients know about the work of anesthesiologists? Rev Bras Anestesiol. 61:720---7.4

Duncan, P. G. (1993). The image of the anaesthetist. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 1993;7:3-7.

Futema, F. (2009). Avaliação pré-anestésica. In: Fantoni, D.T. & Cortopassi S.R.G. Anestesia em cães e gatos. São Paulo, Roca.

Gottschalk, A.; Seelen, S. & Tivey, S. et al. (2013). What do patients know about anesthesiologists? Results of a comparative survey in U.S, Australian and German university hospital. J Clin Anesth. 25:85---91.7

Hariharan, S. (2009). Knowledge and attitudes of patients towards anesthesia and anesthesiologists. A review. Anestesia en Mexico. 21:174---8

Leite, F.; Da Silva, L. M.; & Biancolin, S. E. et al. (2011). Patient perceptions about anesthesia and anesthesiologists before and after surgical procedures. São Paulo Med J. 129:224---9.8

Lumb, V.W. & Jones, E.W. (2015). Anestesiologia e Analgesia em Veterinária. 5ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Roca.

Matthey, P.; Finucane, B. T. & Finegan, B. A. (2001). The attitude of the general public towards preoperative assessment and risks associated with general anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 48: 333-39.

Mavridou, P.; Dimitriou, V. & Papadopoulou, M. et al. (2012). Effect of previous anesthesia experience on patients’ knowledge and desirefor information about anesthesia and the anesthesiologist: a 500 patients’ survey from Greece. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 63:63---8.11.

Mendes, F. F. (2021). O anestesiologista e o paciente insatisfeito. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 71: 97-99.

Mitek, A. E. et al. (2019). Client perceptions of the value of veterinary anesthesiologist involvement with anesthesia and pain management, benefits of a preanesthetic consultation, and quality of care for dogs undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. JAVMA. NOV 15, VOL 255. NO. 10.

Okuda, C.; Inoue, S. & Kawaguchi, M. (2021). Insatisfação com os cuidados anestésicos: análise de coorte histórica para determinar os fatores de risco relacionados. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 71: 103-109.

Ortenzi, A. V. (1996). Avaliação e medicação pré-anestésica. Anestesiologia SAESP. 1. ed. São Paulo: Atheneu, Cap. 17, p. 241-59.

Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Ribeiro, C. S. & Mourão, J. I. B. (2015). Anesthesiologist: the patient’s perception. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 65(6):497---503.

Royston, D. & Cox, F. (2003). Anaesthesia: the patient’s point of view. The Lancet. Vol 362, november 15.

Shevde, K. & Panagopoulos, G. (1991). A survey of 800 patients’ knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg; 73: 190–98.

Simini, B. (2000). Anaesthetist: the wrong name for the right doctor. Lancet. 355:1892.

Wijeysundera, D. N. (2011). Preoperative consultations by anesthesiologists. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 24:326–330.

Downloads

Published

23/03/2022

How to Cite

FREITAS, V. R. de .; SILVA, F. C. da .; NUNES, B. L. M. .; SOARES, K. F. R.; SANTOS, C. P. dos; BOFF, G. A.; NEVES, V. B. das; BIERHALS, E. S.; GUIM, T. N.; GEHRCKE, M. I. Value of pre anesthetic consultation on patients owner’s perception about the anesthesiologist. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. e45911427788, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27788. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27788. Acesso em: 28 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Vitória Ramos de Freitas; Filipe Costa da Silva; Bárbara Luiza Migueis Nunes; Katlyn Flávia Rodrigues Soares; Catiane Prestes dos Santos; Gustavo Antônio Boff; Vittória Bassi das Neves; Eduarda Santos Bierhals; Thomas Normanton Guim; Martielo Ivan Gehrcke

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.