H-index of Brazilian researchers: a comparative look at WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar databases

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i5.27832

Keywords:

Database; Scientific and technical Activities; Scientific publication indicators.

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze a list of highly cited Brazilian researchers linked to UNIFESP, through a comparison between the classification published by Elsevier and the citation counts provided by the databases Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier) and Google Scholar. Thus, it was possible to identify the similarities and differences between the databases and reflect on the metrics of scientific impact and productivity of researchers. The temporal space was defined by a five-year period, from 2016 to 2021. The research results were organized in tables, followed by the respective analyses and comparisons between the consulted databases. From the results obtained, there were divergences in the citation counts from one database to another, precisely because they use different sources for data compilation. Thus, knowing the characteristics of each of the available tools for citation search and its limitations can contribute to the choice of the best databases for calculating the H-index of researchers.

Author Biography

Geoffroy Roger Pointer Malpass, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Departamento de Engenharia Química 

Professor Associado II

References

Avena, M. J., & Barbosa, D. A. (2017). Indicadores bibliométricos das Revistas de Enfermagem sob a ótica das bases indexadoras. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 51, e03262-1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017014603262.

Baas, J., Boyack, K., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021). August 2021 data-update for "Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators". Elsevier BV. https://elsevier.digitalcommonsdata.com/datasets/btchxktzyw/3. https://doi.org-10.17632/btchxktzyw.3.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y.

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., & Repiso-Caballero, R. (2013). The impact of scientific journals of communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus. Comunicar, 21(41), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.3916/c41-2013-04.

Drei, S. M., Carvalho, E. B. de., Mello, J. C. C. B. S. de., & Angulo-Meza, L. (2021). Evaluation of the papers’ panorama on h-index over the decade of 2011 to 2020. Research, Society and Development, 10(11), e360101119785. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19785.

Figueiredo, A. R., Wanderley B. G., Vilas Boas, T. S., & Santos, M. C. (2017). Estudo da eficiência dos portais Science Direct, Scopus, Lilacs e Periódicos CAPES, evidenciando seus aspectos positivos e negativos. Scientia Amazonia, 6(2):1–10.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

Ioannidis, J. P., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS biology, 17(8), e3000384.

Marques, F. (2017). Os limites do índice-h. Boletim Técnico do PPEC, 2(1), 35-39. https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/boletins/index.php/ppec/article/view/9048.

Mugnaini, R., & Strehl, L. (2008). Recuperação e impacto da produção científica na era google: uma análise comparativa entre o google acadêmico e a web of science 10.5007/1518-2924.2008v13nesp1p92. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2008v13nesp1p92.

Oliveira, L., Reichert, F., Zandona, E., Soletti, R. C., & Staniscuaski, F. (2020). The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia. bioRxiv.

Silva, D. D., & Grácio, M. C. C. (2017). Índice h de Hirsch: análise comparativa entre as bases de dados Scopus, Web of Science e Google Acadêmico. Em Questão, 23, 196. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245230.196-212.

Silva, D. D., Almeida, C. C., & Gácio, M. C. C. (2018). Avaliação científica de periódico em ciências sociais: junção dos indicadores fator de impacto e índice h. Encontro Brasileiro de Bibliometria e Cientometria, 6(6), 264–271. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/117487.

Silva, D. D., Almeida, C. C. de, & Grácio, M. C. C. (2018). Associação do Fato de Impacto e do Índice h para a avaliação de periódicos científicos: uma aplicação no campo da Ciência da Informação. Em questão, 24, 132-151, Edição Especial 6 EBBC. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245240.132-151

Thomaz, P. G., Assad, R. S., & Moreira, L. F. P. (2011). Uso do Fator de impacto e do índice H para avaliar pesquisadores e publicações. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 96(2), 90–93. https://www.scielo.br/j/abc/a/kp6RzbscSJt5snkS7XQvsqy/?lang=pt.

Vieira, P. V. M., & Wainer, J. (2013). Correlações entre a contagem de citações de pesquisadores brasileiros, usando o Web of Science, Scopus e Scholar. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 18(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-99362013000300004.

Downloads

Published

31/03/2022

How to Cite

GOUVÊA, A. L. .; ÁVILA, C. H. de .; LADISLAU, D. O. .; LIMA, G. M. de .; RIBEIRO, G. H. M. .; VAZ, J. A.; TOMAZ, L. B. P. . .; SOARES, M. D. .; NETTO, N. de M. .; COSTA, P. R. .; SILVA , R. I. da .; VIEIRA, W. de S. G. .; GAYDECZKA , B. .; OKURA, M. H.; MALPASS, A. C. G. .; MALPASS, G. R. P. H-index of Brazilian researchers: a comparative look at WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 5, p. e13711527832, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i5.27832. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27832. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5

Section

Engineerings

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Alessandra Lacerda Gouvêa; Cássia Helene de Ávila; Danilo Okimoto Ladislau; Guilherme Marcelino de Lima; Gustavo Henrique Marques Ribeiro; Juliana Aparecida Vaz; Lívia Bononi Paiva Tomaz; Mariana Dias Soares; Nilson de Moura Netto; Patrícia Ribeiro Costa; Rachel Inês da Silva ; Wanessa de Sousa Gobbo Vieira; Beatriz Gaydeczka ; Mônica Hitomi Okura; Ana Claudia Granato Malpass; Geoffroy Roger Pointer Malpass

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.