Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR




Polymer; Shear strength; Dental prosthesis; Health teaching.


The present study assesses the shear strength of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zantex to thermopolymerizable acrylic resin (TAR) with different surface treatments. To this end, 100 test specimens were produced and divided into two groups: G1(PEEK + TAR) and G2 (Zantex + TAR). Each group was subdivided into the subgroups A, B, C, D and E (n=10) according to surface pre-treatment: A: TAR + PEEK/Zantex without surface treatment (control); B: TAR + PEEK/Zantex treated with Palabond; C: TAR + PEEK/Zantex blasted with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) of 125 µm; D: TAR + PEEK /Zantex treated with Al2O3 of 125 µm  + Palabond; and E: TAR + PEEK/Zantex prepared with groove-shaped retentions. The structures were tested in a Universal testing machine EMIC DL2000. Two-way variance analysis showed significant difference between materials and surface treatments (p < 0.001). Multiple comparisons were done with Tukey’s test and failure modes were analyzed with the G test. Statistical analysis showed that Zantex outperformed PEEK for most treatments and showed similar performance in the subgroups treated with Al2O3. Within the PEEK group, the use of grooves and Palabond combined with blasting showed the best results; in the Zantex group, the best results were obtained with Palabond and Palabond combined with blasting. Regarding failure modes, PEEK showed only adhesive failures and Zantex’s failures were dependent on treatment. Therefore, the surface treatment method applied to the polymers studied here contribute to the material’s adhesion to acrylic resin.


Bonon, A. J., et al. (2016). Physicochemical characterization of three fiber-reinforced epoxide-based composites for dental applications. Materials Science and Engineering, 69,905-913.

Bergamo, E., et al. (2016). Confiabilidade e modo de falha de próteses parciais fixas implantossuportadas com infraestrutura de compósito reforçado por fibra. PróteseNews, 6, 672-680.

Bötel, F., et al. (2018). Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater, 18, 30088-5.

Campbell, S. D., et al. (2017). Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent, 118(3), 273-80.

Carvalho, G. A., et al. (2017). Polyether ether ketone in protocol bars: Mechanical behavior of three designs. J Int Oral Health, 9(5), 202-206.

Dede, D. Ö., et al. (2021). Influence of chairside surface treatments on the shear bond strength of PEKK polymer to veneering resin materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 125(4), 703.e1-703.e7.

Escobar, M., et al. (2021). On the synergistic effect of sulfonic functionalization and acidic adhesive conditioning to enhance the adhesion of PEEK to resin-matrix composites. Dental Materials: Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 37(4), 741-754.

Gonçalves, V. O., et al. (2009). Resistência ao cisalhamento losipescu em compósitos de fibra de carbono e de vidro com resina epóxi. J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag., 1(1), 49-53.

Jaros, O. A., et al. (2018). Biomechanical behavior of an implant system using polyether ether ketone bar: Finite element analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent, 8, 446-50.

Kürkçüoğlu, I., et al. (2021). Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strenth of CAD‐CAM multidirectional glass fiber‐reinforced composite resin used for implant‐supported prostheses. Polymer International.

Liao, C., et al. (2020) Polyetheretherketone and its compounds for bone replacement and regeneration. Biomedical Polymer Materials II, 1, 2858.

Manolea, H. O., et al. (2017). Current Options of Making Implant Supported Prosthetic Restorations to Mitigate the Impact of Occlusal Forces. Defect and Diffusion Forum, 376, 66-77.

Najeeb. S., et al. (2016). Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res, 60(1), 12-9.

Pulici, C. E., et al. (2017). Influence of the surface treatment on shear bond strength of coatingceramics of zirconia. J Int Dental and Med Res, 10(2), 193-197.

Ramos, E. V. (2018). Efeito de diferentes tratamentos de superfície sobre a rugosidade do Poli-éter-éter-cetona (PEEK) e sua resistência de união à resina acrílica termoativada [tese]. Campinas: Faculdade de Odontologia São Leopoldo Mandic.

Rocha, R. F., et al. (2016). Bonding of the polymer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to human dentin: effect of surface treatments. Braz Dent J. 27(6), 693-699.

Rosentritt, M., et al. (2015). Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig,19(3), 739-44.

Sproesser, O., et al. (2014). Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent, 16(5), 465-72.

Stawarczyk, B., et al. (2014). PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent, 112(5), 1278-88.

Stawarczyk, B., et al. (2018). Bonding ofcomposite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig., 22(2), 763-771.

Torstrick, F. B., et al. (2020). Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 45(8), E417-E424.




How to Cite

FONSECA, T. G. N. .; FRANCO, A. G. .; CARVALHO, G. A. P. de .; MARTINS, C. M. .; MECCA JUNIOR, S.; PEREZ, F.; RAMOS , E. V. .; DIAS, S. C. .; FARIA, R. B. .; FRANCO, A. B. G. . Influence of different surface treatments on the shear strength between acrylic resin and two materials: Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) / ZANTEXR. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 6, p. e51811629608, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29608. Disponível em: Acesso em: 21 jul. 2024.



Health Sciences