Analysis of the electrocardiogram in face of the change in the position of the electrodes: controlled clinical trial




Research; Electrodes; Electrocardiography; Cardiology; Heart diseases; Diagnosis.


Objective: To analyze the electrocardiographic record in the face of intervention in the placement of electrodes on the chest compared to the standard method. Method: Controlled clinical trial, single blind, conducted with 41 patients, who composed the control and intervention groups, generating records that were lauded by two health professionals, proficient in cardiology. Results: Eighty-two electrocardiograms were analyzed, guided by the control and intervention protocols, which included the description of correct and incorrect techniques, respectively. Most of the variables studied did not present a statistically significant difference regarding the reports analyzed when comparing the protocols applied. The exception was the P wave, which was negative in V1 when it should have been positive, as evidenced in the comparison between 14 pairs of electrocardiograms (P = 0.003). Conclusion: The incorrect positioning of the electrodes affected the recording of lead V1. Considering the twelve-lead electrocardiogram usually performed in clinical practice, the possible confusion due to the underlying anatomical landmarks of other procedures, such as, for example, the focus of cardiac auscultation, is highlighted. We suggest the development of additional and technological criteria for the recognition and detection of lead location errors, as well as professional training being a sine qua non condition for carrying out the electrocardiography exam. (ReBEC - NCT: RBR-9h4tp3).


Azeredo, A. F. (2017). Ensaios clínicos randomizados e as fases da pesquisa clínica. HTAnalyze Consultoria e Treinamento.

Bond, R. R., et al. (2012). The effects of electrode misplacement on clinicians' interpretation of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. Eur J Intern Med. 23(7), 610-615.

BRASIL. (2014). Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada, RDC no 51, de 29 de setembro de 2014. Brasília, DF.

Burch, G.E., de Pasqual NP. (1964). A history of electrocardiography. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers Inc.13-129.

García-Niebla, J. (2009). Comparison of p-wave patterns derived from correct and incorrect placement of V1-V2 electrodes. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 24(2), 156-61.

Hallake, J. (2012). Eletrocardiografia. (4ª ed,) Rubio, 43.

Jekova, I., et al. (2016). Inter-lead correlation analysis for automated detection of cable reversals in 12/16-lead ECG. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.134, 31-41.

Köche, J. C (2011). Teoria da ciência e iniciação à pesquisa. Edição Digital.ífica.pdf

Koehler, N. R. (1993) Alterações do eletrocardiograma em V1 por malposição do eletrodo precordial. Arquivo Brasileiro Cardiologia. 61, 99-101.

Lama, A. (2004). Einthoven: El hombre y su invento. Rev Méd.132, 260-264

Lehmann, M. H., et al. (2012). Proposed bedside maneuver to facilitate accurate anatomic orientation for correct positioning of ECG precordial leads V1 and V2: a pilot study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 43(4), 584-92.

Lopes, M. A. C. Q., et al. (2020). Pintando a História da Cardiologia do Brasil. Arquivo Brasileiro Cardiologia. 115(6), 1047-50.

Mehta, N. J., et al. (2002). Cardiology’s 10 greatest discoveries of the 20th century. Tex Heart Inst J. 29(3), 164-71.

Mirvis, D. M., et al. (2015). Electrocardiography. In: Braunwald E. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 10.ed 114-154.

Pastore, C. A., et al (2016). III diretriz da sociedade brasileira de cardiologia sobre análise e emissão de laudos eletrocardiográficos. Arquivo Brasileiro Cardiologia, 106 (4Supl. I), 1-23.

Pereira, M. L. O. R., et al. (2020). Aplicação da metodologia Wavelet Shrinkage para redução de sinais ruidosos em Eletrocardiograma. Brazilian Journal of Development. 6(6), 35395-35402.

Piccolino, M. (1998). Animal electricity and the birth of electrophysiology: the legacy of Luigi Galvani. Brain Research Bulletin, 46(5), 381-407.

Piccolino, M. (2006). Luigi Galvani’s path to animal electricity. C R Biol, 329(5-6), 303-18.

Rajaganeshan, R., et al. (2008). R. Accuracy in ECG lead placement among technicians, nurses, general physicians and cardiologists. Int J Clin Pract,62(1),65-70.

Ribeiro, D. G., & Barros, F. F. (2020) Conhecimento da equipe de enfermagem de setores críticos na realização e interpretação de eletrocardiograma. Rev Espaço para a Saúde, 21(1), 47-58.

Santos, E. C. L., et al. (2017). Manual de eletrocardiografia. Cardiopapers. (1ª ed,) Atheneu.

Thaler, M. S. (2013). ECG Essencial Eletrocardiograma na prática diária. (7a. ed.)Artmed.

Thygesen, K., et al. (2012). Third universal definition of Myocardial Infarction. European Heart Journal, 33, 2551–2567.

Vasconcelos, B. C. E. (2016). O cegamento na pesquisa científica. Rev. cir. traumatol. buco-maxilo-fac, 16(1), 5-5.

Waller, A. D. (1887). A demonstration on man of electromotive changes accompanying the heart’s beat. The Physiological Society, 8(5), 229-34.

Walsh, B. (2018). Misplacing V1 and V2 can have clinical consequences. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 36(5), 865-870.



How to Cite

CALAZANS, J. de O. .; CARVALHO, L. X. R. .; PEREIRA, M. G. .; SILVA, R. F. A. da . Analysis of the electrocardiogram in face of the change in the position of the electrodes: controlled clinical trial. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 10, p. e511111033051, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.33051. Disponível em: Acesso em: 4 oct. 2022.



Health Sciences