Mapping of available protocols for communicating bad news in health: scope review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34608Keywords:
Protocols; Scope review; Communication of bad news.Abstract
Objective: to map the available protocols for communicating bad news in health for such a scientific contribution. Method: The scope review protocol will be based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the selection of studies will follow the guidelines proposed in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. To record development intent and scientific availability, the protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework platform nº osf.io/sgev2. For the scope of the review, literature that includes evidence to answer the guiding question will be considered: What are the protocols for communicating bad news available to health professionals?. The databases used will be: PubMed/MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science and Portal of Periodicals of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. As gray literature will be adopted: google scholar, the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Open Grey. The research will take place systematically, in pairs and independently. The studies will be directed to the EndNoteWeb manager to file and delete duplicate articles. The selected references will be sent to the Rayyan-Intelligent Systematic Review software for the reading of titles and abstracts and classification using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In case of discrepancy, a third reviewer may intervene. The next step consists of reading the selected studies in full and re-screening them using the aforementioned criteria. The data will be presented in such a way as to provide the reader with a robust and up-to-date view of the availability of protocols for communicating bad news in health. In the discussion, relevant aspects will be pointed out and interrelated in a narrative way.
References
Araújo, W. C. O. (2020). Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. Convergências em Ciência da Informação, 3(2), 100-134. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/52993
Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES—A Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News: Application to the Patient with Cancer. The Oncologist, 5(4), 302-11. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302
Carús, C. S., Vieira, A. G., Botton, L. T. J., Schubert, C., & Fagundes, M. A. B. G. (2021). Barreiras para comunicação eficaz em Saúde. Research, Society and Development, 10(7), e10810716218. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16218.
Cordeiro, L., & Soares, C. B. (2019). Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. Síntese de evidências qualitativas para informar políticas de saúde, 20(2), 37-43. https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/10/1021863/bis-v20n2-sintese-de-evidencias-qualitativas-37-43.pdf.
Cruz, C. O., & Riera, R. (2016). Comunicando más notícias: o protocolo SPIKES. Diagn Tratamento, 21(3), 106-8. https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2016/08/1365/rdt_v21n3_106-108.pdf.
Departamento Científico de Cuidados Paliativos e Dor. (2018). É possível comunicar notícias difíceis sem iatrogenia?. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. https://www.sbp.com.br/imprensa/detalhe/nid/e-possivel-comunicar-noticias-dificeis-sem-iatrogenia/
Dupont, P., El-Dine, G. P., & Santos, S. K. Z. (2021). Relevância da comunicação de más notícias pelo profissional da saúde de maneira adequada: revisão narrativa. Revista Eletronica Acervo saúde, 3(9), e8695. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e8695.2021
Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Associatio, 105(2), 203. http://doi.org/gfxvhq.
McKinney, A. (2013). EndNote web: web-based bibliographic management. Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries, 10(4), 185-192. https://doi.org/h7gg.
Nonino, A., Magalhães, S. G., & Falcão, D. P. (2012). Treinamento médico para comunicação de más notícias: revisão da literatura. Relato de Experiência. Rev. bras. educ. med, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-55022012000400011
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
Pereira, C. R. (2010). Comunicando Más Notícias: Protocolo Paciente. Universidade Estadual paulista.
Pereira, M. A. G. (2005). Comunicação de más notícias em saúde e gestão do luto. Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências de Educação da Universidade do Porto. https://sigarra.up.pt/fpceup/pt/pub_geral.pub_view?pi_pub_base_id=29721.
Perosa. G. B., & Ranzalini. P.M. (2008). Capacitação do Médico para Comunicar Más Notícias à Criança. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 32(4), 468–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-55022008000400009.
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping reviews (2020 version). In Aromataris, E. & Munn, Z. Joanna Briggs Institute manual for evidence synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
Pham, M. T. Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research synthesis methods, 5(4), 371-385. http://doi.org/gdkzzn.
Ribeiro, K. G., Batista, M. H., Souza, D. F. O., Florêncio, C. M. G. D., Jorge, W. H. A., & Raquel, C. P. (2021). Comunicação de más notícias na educação médica e confluências com o contexto da pandemia de covid-19. Saude soc, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021201058
Silva, E. E. G., Rodriguez, G. C., Silveira, G. B., Laguna, T. F. S., Cella, M. L. S. G., Rangel, R. F., & Kruel, C. S. (2021). Percepção dos profissionais da saúde acerca da comunicação de más notícias e óbitos no contexto perinatal. Research, Society and Development, 10(5): e43510515101. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15101
Silva, M. J. P. (2012). Comunicação de Más Notícias. O Mundo da Saúde, 36(1), 49-53. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/artigos/mundo_saude/comunicacao_mas_noticias.pdf
Torre, B. A. P., Ricci, M. F. C. C. M., & Linhares, U. C. (2020). Comunicação em Saúde. Revista de Saúde. http://dx.doi.org/10.21727/rs.v0i0.2565.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Victorino, A. B., Nisenbaum, E. B., Gibello, J., Bastos, M. Z. N., & Andreoli, P. B. A. (2007). Como comunicar más notícias: revisão bibliográfica. Rev. SBPH, 10(1), 53-63. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-08582007000100005&lng=pt&nrm=iso.
Vogel, K. P., Silva, J. H. G., Ferreira, L. C., & Machado, L. C. (2019). Comunicação de Más Notícias: Ferramenta Essencial na Graduação Médica. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 43(1), 314-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v43suplemento1-20180264.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fabíola Pinheiro Gomes Cavalcante; Virna Ribeiro Feitosa Cestari; Anamaria Cavalcante e Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
