Neuromarketing: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35572Keywords:
Neuromarketing; Neuroeconomics; Cognitive neuroscience; Behavioral neuroscience; Consumer.Abstract
The aim of this systematic review is to elucidate how the Neuromarketing field has been studied in terms of consumer behavior through experimental protocols that make use of statistics (quantitative analysis). At the same time, it aims to verify how new Neuromarketing protocols can better clarify consumer behavior patterns, as well as understand the decision-making process and how to meet consumer needs. Articles dated between 2016 and 2020 were initially collected in the PubMed, Science Direct and DOAJ databases and subjected to a filtering to remove duplicates and apply the exclusion criteria, which resulted in 13 final articles selected. Although studies suggest it is necessary to customize ads, generate positive emotions, use the image and speech of famous people and attractive packaging to be able to capture the consumer's attention, a methodological standardization is necessary among neuromarketing research so that they can be replicated and their hypotheses become capable of being validated.
References
Babiloni, F., & Cherubino, P. (2020). Neuromarketing, Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Cambridge: Academic Press.
Bridger, D. (2018). Neuromarketing: como a neurociência aliada ao design pode aumentar o engajamento e a influência sobre os consumidores. Autêntica Business.
Boccia, F., Malgeri Manzo, R., & Covino, D. (2019). Consumer behavior and corporate social responsibility: An evaluation by a choice experiment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 97-105.
Casado‐Aranda, L. A., Van der Laan, L. N., & Sánchez‐Fernández, J. (2018). Neural correlates of gender congruence in audiovisual commercials for gender‐targeted products: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 39(11), 4360-4372.
Çakir, M. P., Çakar, T., Girisken, Y., & Yurdakul, D. (2018). An investigation of the neural correlates of purchase behavior through fNIRS. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1/2), 224-243.
Cohen, E. D., Lima, G. G., & Schulz, P. A. B. (2017). 5. Neuromarketing: uma nova disciplina acadêmica?. Marketing & Tourism Review, 2(2).
Crespo-Pereira, V., Legerén-Lago, B., & Arregui-McGullion, J. (2020). Implementing Neuromarketing in the Enterprise: Factors That Impact the Adoption of Neuromarketing in Major Spanish Corporations. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 576789.
Fink, A. (2003). How to sample in surveys (Vol. 7). Sage.
Galvão, T. F., Pansani, T. D. S. A., & Harrad, D. (2015). Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiologia e serviços de saúde, 24, 335-342.
Gill, R., & Singh, J. (2020). A study of neuromarketing techniques for proposing cost effective information driven framework for decision making. Materials Today: Proceedings.
Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 372-386.
Hopf, J. M., Boehler, C. N., Schoenfeld, M. A., Mangun, G. R., & Heinze, H. J. (2012). Attentional selection for locations, features, and objects in vision. American Psychological Association.
Hsu, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2019). Music and wine tasting: an experimental neuromarketing study. British food journal, 122(8), 2725-2737.
Hubert, M., Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2018). Trust me if you can–neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings. European Journal of Marketing.
Ivey, A. E., Daniels, T., Zalaquett, C. P., & Ivey, M. B. (2017). Neuroscience of attention: Empathy and counseling skills. Neurocounseling: Brain‐Based Clinical Approaches, 81-100.
Jesus, J. S. R. de, & Jesus, B. S. de. (2022). O impacto do uso do smartphone na educação escolar: uma Revisão Sistemática. Revista Prática Docente, 7(2), e22057. https://doi.org/10.23926/RPD.2022.v7.n2.e22057.id1541
Lim, W. M. (2018). Demystifying neuromarketing. Journal of business research, 91, 205-220.
Lindsay, G. W. (2020). Attention in psychology, neuroscience, and machine learning. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 14, 29.
Rasyid, M. F. A., & Djamal, E. C. (2019, September). Emotion and attention of neuromarketing using wavelet and recurrent neural networks. In 2019 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI) (pp. 49-54). IEEE.
Mangun, G. R. (Ed.). (2012). The Neuroscience of Attention: The Neuroscience of Attention: Attentional Control and Selection. Oxford University Press.
Madan, A., Rosca, M. I., & Bucovicean, M. (2021). Theoretical Approach of Subliminal Advertising. In Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives (pp. 293-302). Springer, Cham.
Moya, I., García-Madariaga, J., & Blasco, M. F. (2020). What can neuromarketing tell us about food packaging?. Foods, 9(12), 1856.
Nemorin, S. (2017). Neuromarketing and the “poor in world” consumer: how the animalization of thinking underpins contemporary market research discourses. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(1), 59-80.
Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Ahmadi, N., Ahani, A., Abumalloh, R. A., Asadi, S., ... & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2020). Neuromarketing: a review of research and implications for marketing. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems, 7(2), 23-31.
Plassmann, H., Yoon, C., Feinberg, F., & Shiv, B. (2011). Consumer neuroscience. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Rawnaque, F. S., Rahman, K. M., Anwar, S. F., Vaidyanathan, R., Chau, T., Sarker, F., & Mamun, K. A. A. (2020). Technological advancements and opportunities in Neuromarketing: a systematic review. Brain Informatics, 7(1), 1-19.
Rojas, J. C., Contero, M., Bartomeu, N., & Guixeres, J. (2015). Using combined bipolar semantic scales and eye‐tracking metrics to compare consumer perception of real and virtual bottles. Packaging technology and science, 28(12), 1047-1056.
Royo, M., Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., & Galán, J. (2018). Users’ reactions captured by means of an EEG headset on viewing the presentation of sustainable designs using verbal narrative. European Journal of Marketing.
Meyerding, S. G., & Mehlhose, C. M. (2020). Can neuromarketing add value to the traditional marketing research? An exemplary experiment with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Journal of Business Research, 107, 172-185.
Schneider, T., & Woolgar, S. (2012). Technologies of ironic revelation: enacting consumers in neuromarkets. Consumption Markets & Culture, 15(2), 169-189.
Slijepčević, M., Šević, N. P., & Radojević, I. (2019). Limiting Aspects of Neuromarketing Research. Mednarodno inovativno poslovanje. Journal of Innovative Business and Management, 11(1), 72-83.
Sato, S. K. (2011). Kotler, P.; Kartajaya, H.; Setiawan, I. Marketing 3.0: as forças que estão definindo o novo marketing centrado no ser humano. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. Marketing 3.0: um novo conceito para interagir comum novo consumidor. Signos do Consumo, 3(2), 243-245.
Sofi, S. A., Nika, F. A., Shah, M. S., & Zarger, A. S. (2018). Impact of subliminal advertising on consumer buying behaviour: an empirical study on young Indian consumers. Global business review, 19(6), 1580-1601.
Stasi, A., Songa, G., Mauri, M., Ciceri, A., Diotallevi, F., Nardone, G., & Russo, V. (2018). Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review. Food Research International, 108, 650-664.
Trappey, C. (1996). A meta‐analysis of consumer choice and subliminal advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 517-530.
Venkatraman, V., Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P. A., Vo, K., Hampton, W., Bollinger, B., ... & Winer, R. S. (2015). Predicting advertising success beyond traditional measures: New insights from neurophysiological methods and market response modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 436-452.
Wisz, M. S., Hijmans, R. J., Li, J., Peterson, A. T., Graham, C. H., Guisan, A., & NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group. (2008). Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and distributions, 14(5), 763-773.
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and psychological measurement, 73(6), 913-934.
Wolfe, K., Jo, W., Olds, D., Asperin, A., DeSanto, J., & Liu, W. C. (2016). An fMRI study of the effects of food familiarity and labeling on brain activation. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 14(4), 332-346.
Yadava, M., Kumar, P., Saini, R., Roy, P. P., & Prosad Dogra, D. (2017). Analysis of EEG signals and its application to neuromarketing. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(18), 19087-19111
Yueh, H. P., & Zheng, Y. L. (2019). Effectiveness of storytelling in agricultural marketing: Scale development and model evaluation. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 452.
Zito, M., Fici, A., Bilucaglia, M., Ambrogetti, F. S., & Russo, V. (2021). Assessing the emotional response in social communication: the role of neuromarketing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 625570.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Janile Silva Rodrigues de Jesus; Lilian Nathalie Oliveira da Silva; Stephany Campanelli Esmaile
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
