Quantification of animal species using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to verify fraud in meat products

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i1.38972

Keywords:

Real-time qPCR; Validation; Beef and chicken meat; Myostatin.

Abstract

Food labeling is fundamental to avoid eating a specific kind of meat for religious and cultural reasons, but mainly to avoid fraud with the purpose of obtaining financial advantages. The real-time qPCR method is commonly used to quantify DNA in a given sample by relative quantification (concentration of specific target DNA over concentration of endogenous DNA). In studies that use qPCR to quantify contaminating species, normalization is performed using a single-copy reference gene, such as myostatin, present in most mammals and birds. This study aimed to standardize the real-time qPCR technique to obtain relative quantitative results in rigged beef. For method standardization, the limit of detection (LD) resulted in a Cq fluorescence signal of 36.80 cycles in at least 9 out of 10 repetitions (90%) at a concentration of 0.008% in horse and Cq of 36.60 cycles in at least 7 of 10 repetitions (70%) at a concentration of 0.0005% in chicken. The lowest concentration at which the relative standard deviation (RSD) was ≤25% was between 0.125% and 0.031% for both horse and chicken. Even using standard quantitation curves containing 50% meat blends or 100% pure target meat, curve slope, amplification efficiency, and linear correlation were within recommended acceptance criteria. The test is sensitive and an alternative in the routine inspection of products for both human and animal consumption.

Author Biographies

Hans Fröder, Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduated in Full Degree in Sciences with specialization in Biology (2000) from the University of Vale do Taquari (UNIVATES), Specialization in Biotechnology and Bioprocesses (2018) from the State University of Maringá, Master's (2005) and Doctorate (2008) in Science of Food - Bromatology area at the University of São Paulo, with a Sandwich Doctorate at the Freie Universität Berlin / Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), and Post-Doctoral internship at the Post-Graduate Program in Biotechnology (2022) at the University of Caxias do Sul ( UCS). He has experience in the area of food microbiology and molecular biology, working mainly on the following topics: official and alternative methods for the detection and quantification of pathogens in food, identification of animal species and genetically modified organisms by real-time qPCR, design of primers /probes, in addition to teaching at undergraduate and graduate levels

Eléia Righi, Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul

Graduated from UFSM-RS, in the Bachelor of Geography course. Bachelor in Business Administration from UNOPAR. Master in Geography by UFRGS-RS. PhD in Geography from UFRGS-RS. She has experience in the field of Geosciences, with an emphasis on Physical and Human Geography, working mainly on the following topics: Geodisasters, Mathematical Modeling, Water Resources, Cartography, Geoprocessing, Remote Sensing, Regional / Local Sustainable Development, Tourism and Environmental Management. I am currently coordinating the courses: Postgraduate Lato Sensu in: Innovation and Technology for Food and Beverage; and Lato Sensu Post-Graduation in: Agronomy, Environment and Sustainability

References

Alikord, M., Momtaz, H., Kadivar, M., & Rad, A. H. (2018). Species identification and animal authentication in meat products: a review. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 12(1), 145-155.

Ballin, N. Z. (2010). Authentication of meat and meat products. Meat science, 86(3), 577-587.

Bariani, J. L. (2021). Food Satefty Brazil. Escândalo da carne de cavalo: Brasil dez anos atrasado. Website Food Satefty Brazil. https://foodsafetybrazil.org/escandalo-da-carne-de-cavalo-brasil-dez-anos-atrasado/jose-luiz-bariani/2021/.

Brasil. (2020). Instrução Normativa - IN N° 75, de 8 de outubro de 2020. Estabelece os requisitos técnicos para declaração da rotulagem nutricional nos alimentos embalados. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa). http://antigo.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3882585/IN_75_2020_COMP.pdf/e89784b5-ed18-4bdd-a4d4-139724a56d4d.

Chen, X., Lu, L., Xiong, X., Xiong, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Development of a real-time PCR assay for the identification and quantification of bovine ingredient in processed meat products. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-10.

Dolch, K., Judas, M., Schwägele, F., & Brüggemann, D. A. (2019). Development and validation of two triplex real-time PCR systems for the simultaneous detection of six cereal species in processed meat products. Food Control, 101, 180-188.

Druml, B., Mayer, W., Cichna-Markl, M., & Hochegger, R. (2015). Development and validation of a TaqMan real-time PCR assay for the identification and quantification of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in food to detect food adulteration. Food Chemistry, 178, 319-326.

Druml, B., Kaltenbrunner, M., Hochegger, R., & Cichna-Markl, M. (2016). A novel reference real-time PCR assay for the relative quantification of (game) meat species in raw and heat-processed food. Food Control, 70, 392-400.

Drummond, M. G., Brasil, B. S. A. F., Dalsecco, L. S., Brasil, R. S. A. F., Teixeira, L. V., & Oliveira, D. A. A. (2013). A versatile real-time PCR method to quantify bovine contamination in buffalo products. Food Control, 29(1), 131-137.

ENGL, European Network of GMO Laboratories. (2015). Definition of Minimum Performance Requirements for Analytical Methods of GMO Testing. JRC Technical Report. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/MPR%20Report%20Application%2020_10_2015.pdf.

Furutani, S., Hagihara, Y., & Nagai, H. (2017). On-site identification of meat species in processed foods by a rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction system. Meat science, 131, 56-59.

Giglioti, R., Polli, H., Azevedo, B. T., Katiki, L. M., & Vercesi Filho, A. E. (2022). Detection and quantification of adulteration in milk and dairy products: A novel and sensitive qPCR-based method. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences, 4, 100074.

Hou, B., Meng, X., Zhang, L., Guo, J., Li, S., & Jin, H. (2015). Development of a sensitive and specific multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of chicken, duck and goose DNA in meat products. Meat science, 101, 90-94.

Ifs food. (2020). Norma para avaliar a conformidade de produtos e processos em relação à segurança de alimentos e qualidade. https://www.ifs-certification.com/images/standards/ifs_food7/documents/standards/IFS_Food7_pt.pdf.

Inmetro. (2016). Coordenação Geral de Acreditação. Orientação sobre Validação de Métodos Analíticos. DOQ-CGCRE-008. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.inmetro.gov.br/Sidoq/Arquivos/Cgcre/DOQ/DOQ-Cgcre-8_05.pdf.

ISO. (2020). Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification. ISO/TS 20224-1. Molecular biomarker analysis – Detection of animal-derived materials in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by real-time PCR – Part 1: Bovine DNA detection method. 1st.Edition.

ISO. (2020). Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification. ISO/TS 20224-2. Molecular biomarker analysis – Detection of animal-derived materials in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by real-time PCR – Part 2: Ovine DNA detection method. 1st.Edition.

ISO. (2020). Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification. ISO/TS 20224-3. Molecular biomarker analysis – Detection of animal-derived materials in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by real-time PCR – Part 3: Porcine DNA detection method. 1st.Edition.

ISO. (2020). Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification. ISO/TS 20224-4. Molecular biomarker analysis – Detection of animal-derived materials in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by real-time PCR – Part 4: Chicken DNA detection method. 1st.Edition.

ISO. (2020). Organization for Standardization/Technical Specification. ISO/TS 20224-6. Molecular biomarker analysis – Detection of animal-derived materials in foodstuffs and feedstuffs by real-time PCR – Part 6: Horse DNA detection method. 1st.Edition.

Iwobi, A., Sebah, D., Kraemer, I., Losher, C., Fischer, G., Busch, U., & Huber, I. (2015). A multiplex real-time PCR method for the quantification of beef and pork fractions in minced meat. Food chemistry, 169, 305-313.

Kang, T. S., & Tanaka, T. (2018). Comparison of quantitative methods based on SYBR Green real-time qPCR to estimate pork meat adulteration in processed beef products. Food chemistry, 269, 549-558.

Köppel, R., van Velsen, F., Ganeshan, A., Pietsch, K., Weber, S., Graf, C., & Licina, A. (2020). Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of DNA from chamois, roe, deer, pork and beef. European Food Research and Technology, 246(5), 1007-1015.

Laube, I., Zagon, J., & Broll, H. (2007). Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real‐time PCR. International journal of food science & technology, 42(3), 336-341.

Li, J., Li, J., Liu, R., Wei, Y., & Wang, S. (2021a). Identification of eleven meat species in foodstuff by a hexaplex real-time PCR with melting curve analysis. Food Control, 121, 107599.

Li, T., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Qiao, L., Liu, R., Li, S., & Chen, A. (2021b). Quantitative determination of mutton adulteration with single-copy nuclear genes by real-time PCR. Food Chemistry, 344, 128622.

Lubis, H., Salihah, N. T., Hossain, M. M., & Ahmed, M. U. (2017). Development of fast and sensitive real-time qPCR assay based on a novel probe for detection of porcine DNA in food sample. LWT, 84, 686-692.

Marchetti, P., Mottola, A., Tantillo, G., Castrica, M., & Di Pinto, A. (2021). Detection of undeclared presence of bovine milk in buffalo yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(4), 4056-4061.

Oliveira, A. C. D. S., Ferreira, B. C. A., Cardoso, G. V. F., Silva, C. L., da Silva, A. S., da Silva, F., & de Moraes, C. M. (2015). Avaliação da técnica PCR multiplex para detecção de fraude por adição de carne bubalina em carne moída bovina. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 74(4), 371-379.

QIAGEN. (2020). DNeasy mericon Food Handbook. https://www.qiagen.com/gb/resources/resourcedetail?id=bd9cc2a8-aa71-4cb5-b6f7-97b3d7fc306d&lang=en.

QIAGEN. (2013). QuantiNova™ Probe PCR Handbook. https://www.qiagen.com/us/resources/resourcedetail?id=5167d782-9fef-4202-bc79-95f358be7d8c&lang=en.

Lazaro, D. R. (2013). Real-Time PCR in Food Science: Current Technology and Applications. Caister Academic Press.

Sarlak, Z., Shojaee-Aliabadi, S., Rezvani, N., Hosseini, H., Rouhi, M., & Dastafkan, Z. (2022). Development and validation of TaqMan real-time PCR assays for quantification of chicken adulteration in hamburgers. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 106, 104302.

Sincabima. Fraude alimentar. Uma realidade no setor industrial. https://sincabima.org.br/2019/03/18/fraude-alimentar-uma-realidade-no-setor-industrial/.

Soares, S., Amaral, J. S., Oliveira, M. B. P., & Mafra, I. (2013). A SYBR Green real-time PCR assay to detect and quantify pork meat in processed poultry meat products. Meat Science, 94(1), 115-120.

Thanakiatkrai, P., & Kitpipit, T. (2017). Meat species identification by two direct-triplex real-time PCR assays using low resolution melting. Food chemistry, 233, 144-150.

Visciano, P., & Schirone, M. (2021). Food frauds: Global incidents and misleading situations. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 114, 424-442.

Xu, R., Wei, S., Zhou, G., Ren, J., Liu, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, X. (2018). Multiplex TaqMan locked nucleic acid real-time PCR for the differential identification of various meat and meat products. Meat science, 137, 41-46.

Zhang, C. (2013). Semi-nested multiplex PCR enhanced method sensitivity of species detection in further-processed meats. Food Control, 31(2), 326-330.

Published

01/01/2023

How to Cite

FRÖDER, H.; RIGHI, E. Quantification of animal species using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to verify fraud in meat products. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. e1512138972, 2023. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i1.38972. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/38972. Acesso em: 19 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences