Biofeedback on eretic disfunction and quality of life in post radical prostatectomy patients: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i3.40482Keywords:
Radical prostatectomy; Erectile dysfunction; Quality of life; Biofeedback.Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the male population, and although the gold standard treatment is radical prostectomy, it is common for unwanted effects to arise, such as erectile dysfunction and emotional problems. A tool that helps in the treatment of erectile dysfunction is the biofeedback, which acts through the visualization and recording of pelvic floor muscle contractions. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate if biofeedback improves erectile function and quality of life in patients after radical prostatectomy. Articles were searched in the databases PUBMED, LILACS, PEDro, and SCIELO, using the descriptors "erectile dysfunction", "quality of life" and "prostatectomy". Throughout the study, it was observed that the use of biofeedback probably reveals a positive effect on erectile function, and may significantly interfere with the quality of life of the study population. We suggested, therefore, the production of more articles due to the scarce number of interventional studies on the theme.
References
Alves, M. A. S. G., Queiroz, T. M. & Medeiros, I. A. (2012). Fisiologia peniana e disfunção erétil: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Saúde. 16(3), 439-44.
Bernardes, M. F. V. G. et al. (2019). Impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of individuals undergoing radical prostatectomy. Revista Latino Americana de Enfermagem. 27(e3131). Doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2757.3131.
Brasil. (2002). Programa nacional de controle do câncer da próstata: documento de consenso. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Assistência à Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA).
Dorey, G. (2000). Conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction 3: literature review. British Journal of Nursing. 9(13), 859-863.
Emanu, J. C., & Avildsen, I. K., & Nelson, C. J. (2016). Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy: Prevalence, Medical Treatments, and Psychosocial Interventions. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care. 10(1), 102-107.
Fitz, F. F. et al. (2012) Efeito da adição do biofeedback ao treinamento dos músculos do assoalho pélvico para o tratamento da incontinência urinária de esforço. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 34(11), 505-510.
Hite M., & Curran, T. (2021). Biofeedback for Pelvic Floor Disorders. Clinics Colon and Rectal Surgery. 34(1), 56-61.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2020). ABC do câncer: abordagens básicas para o controle do câncer. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: INCA.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2019). Incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: INCA
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2020). Plano estratégico do INCA 2020-2023. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: INCA.
Izidoro, L. C. R. et al. (2019). Qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde e fatores psicossociais após prostatectomia radical. Acta Paul Enferm. 32(2), 169-177.
Kumar, V. et al. (2010). Patologia - Bases Patológicas das Doenças. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Elsevier.
Vaz, J.P.S. et al. (2015). Câncer de Próstata: Métodos de diagnóstico, prevenção e tratamento. Brazilian Journal of Surgery and Clinical Research. 10(3), 40-46.
Liatsikos, E. N., & Assimakopoulos, K., & Stolzenburg, J. U. (2008). Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis. 80(3), 226-230.
Lira, G. H. S. et al. (2019). Effects of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training on early recovery of urinary continence and erectile function in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 4(6), 1196-1203.
Naccarato, A. M. E. P. et al. (2020). Quality of life and sexual health in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. The Aging Male. 23(5), 346-353.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372(71). Doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pechorro, P. S., & Vieira, R. X. (2011). Validação de uma versão portuguesa do Índice Internacional de Função Eréctil-5 (IIEF-5). Revista Internacional de Andrologia. 9(1), 3-9.
Prota, C. et al. (2012). Early postoperative pelvic-floor biofeedback improves erectile function in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. International Journal of Impotence Research. 24(5), 174-178
Rebello, R. J. et al. (2021). Prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 7(9). Doi:10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0.
Schout, B. M. A., & Meuleman, E. J. H. (2012). Erectiestoornis en incontinentie na prostatectomie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 156(A4667).
Teixeira, J. M. P. et al. (2020). Qualidade de vida do doente portador de patologia oncológica da próstata. Revista de Enfermagem Referência. 5(1). Doi: 10.12707/RIV19063.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marcelo Vinícius de Lima Araújo; Maria Marina Siqueira da Silva; Teresa Augusta da Penha Lustosa Nogueira; Andrea Lima da Silva; Cintia Maria da Silva Dutra; Manuella da Luz Duarte Barros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
