Morse Connection: Literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i7.46198Keywords:
Implantology; Cone-morse; Implant.Abstract
Oral rehabilitation through dental implants has become one of the main means for restoring function and aesthetics to patients who have partially or totally lost their teeth. Since then, new implant systems have emerged, including the cone-morse system. Thus, this study aims to review the literature in order to analyze the clinical application and benefits of using the cone-morse implant. This literature review was performed from the selection of scientific articles with online publication. The review was conducted in the main national and international databases, namely: SCIELO, Biomedical Journal Literature at the service of the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) and CAPES Portal. The results of the studies showed that the cone-morse system has advantages over other systems, since it presents more stability, less contamination by bacteria and better proservation of periodontal and bone structures. Thus, it was concluded that the cone-morse system presents a good prognosis of maintenance and functioning in oral rehabilitation, being a treatment option with good applicability in dentistry.
References
Arvidson, K. et al. (2023) Five-years prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech dental implant system in the treatment of edentulous mandible. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 9(4), 225-234.
Asvanud, P., & Morgano, S. (2011) Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections. J. Prosthet. Dent., St. Louis, 106(4), 266–271.
Brãnemark, P. I., Gröndahl K., & Brånemark B. K. (2015) Why osseointegration would work and how it did in the first patients treated: basic facts and philosophical thoughts. In: BRÅNEMARK, P. I. The osseointegration book. Berlin: Quintessence Verlags- GmbH, 19-114.
Casseta, M. et al. (2016) The survival of morse cone-connection implants with platform switch. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 31(5), 1031-1039
Conceição, E. N. (2013) Visão horizontal: odontologia estética para todos. Maringá: Dental Press. 334-343.
Degidi, M. et al. (2012) Peri-implant collagen fibers around human cone morse connection implants under polarized light: a report of three cases. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 32(3), 323-328.
Dʼercole, S. et al. (2014) Bacterial leakage in morse cone internal connection implants using different torque values: an in vitro study. Implant Dent., Baltimore, 23(2), 175 -179.
Feitosa, P. C. et al. (2013) Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test. Eur. J. Dent., 7(3), 267-271.
Gehrke, S. (2014) Changes in the abutment-implant interface in morse taper implant connections after mechanical cycling: a pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 29(4), 791-797.
Jaworski, M. et al. (2012) Analysis of the bacterial seal at the implant-abutment interface in external-hexagon and Morse taper-connection implants: an in vitro study using a new methodology. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implant., 27(5), 1091- 1095.
Kfourif, F. A. (2017) Versatilidade clínica de componentes protéticos cone morse. Rev. Elet. FMU. 2(2).
Koutouzis, T. et al. (2014) Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of implants with platform-switched morse taper connection with the implant-abutment interface at different levels in relation to the alveolar crest. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 29(5), 1157 -1163.
Larrucea et al. (2014) Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res., 25(9), 1078-83.
Lopes, A. C. et al. (2014) Infiltração bacteriana na interface implante/pilar: considerações ao implantodontista. Rev. Gaúch. Odontol., 58, 239-242.
Ckhraisat, A. et al. (2022) Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J. Prosthet. Dent. 88(6), 604-610.
Macedo, J. P. et al. (2016) Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: the new paradigm in oral implantology. Eur. J. Dent., 10(1), 148-154.
Maeda, Y., Satoh, T., Sogo, M. (2016) In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant–abutment connections: a short communication J. Oral Rehabil. 33(1), 75 -78.
Mangano C. et al. (2015) Fixed restorations supported by Morse-taper connection implants: a retrospective clinical study with 10-20 years of follow-up. Clin. Oral Implant. Res., 26(10), 1229-1236.
Mangano, C. et al. (2011) Prospective evaluation of 2,549 morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data. J. Periodontol., 82(1), 52-61.
Nentwig, G. H. (2004) Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application. J.Oral Implantol. 30(3),171-7.
Novaes, A. B. J. R., Barros, R. R., Muglia, V. A, et al. (2009) Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol. 35(1), 18-27.
Novaes, A. B. J. R., Barros, R. R. , Muglia, V. A., et al. (2016) The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a morse cone connection and a platform switch: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol. 77(11), 1839-49.
Odo, C. et al. (2015) Stress on external hexagon and Morse taper implants submitted to immediate loading. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. Piracicaba 5(3), 173-179,.
Pellizzer, E. et al. (2014) Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems. J. Oral Implantol., 40(2), 117-122.
Peruzeitto, M. et al. (2016) Microbiological seal of two types of tapered implant connections. Braz. Dent. J. 27(3), 273-277.
Pessoa, R. S. et al. (2017) Bone remodeling around implants with externalhexagon and morse-taper connections: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, clinicaltrial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 19(1), 97-110.
Pita, M. et al. (2011) Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry. J. Craniofac. Surg., 22(6), 2327-2331.
Poazzi, A. et al. (2014) Clinical and radiological outcomes of two implants with different prosthetic interfaces and neck configurations: randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res., 16(1), 96-106.
Ranieri, R. et al. (2015) The bacterial sealing capacity of morse taper implant–abutment systems in vitro. J. Periodontol., 86(5), 696-702.
Schmitt, C. et al. (2014) Performance of conical abutment (morse taper) connection implants: A systematic review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 102(2), 552-574.
Tang, C., Zhao, S., Huang, C. (2017) Features and advances of Morse taper connection in oral implant. Chin. Journal Stomatolog. 52(1), 59-62.
Tripodi, D. et al. Degree of bacterial microleakage at the implant-abutment junction in Cone Morse tapered implants under loaded and unloaded conditions. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct Mater. 13(4), 367-371.
Valente, M. et al. (2015) Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods. Clinic. Oral Investig. 19(8), 1851-1866.
Verri, F. R. et al. (2012) Visão contemporânea do uso de implantes de conexão interna tipo cone morse. Rev. Odontol. 33(1), 49-53.
Weng, D. et al. (2018) Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implant. Res., 19, 1141-1147.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Camila Aguillar Gonçalves; Maylon Luciano Garcia Barbosa; Daiany de Mendonça Silva; Sabrina Quirido Affonso; Andressa Ferreira Martins; Lívia Prates Soares; Felipe da Silva Peralta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
