Dysthanasia and orthothanasia: Ethical, legal and social reflections in contemporary medical practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i8.46604Keywords:
Right to die; Medical ethics; Medical practice standards; Legal standards; Paternalism.Abstract
Euthanasia, although illegal in Brazil, is widely discussed in the legal field. In contrast, orthothanasia—death without suffering and at the right time—and dysthanasia—death with prolonged and painful life—are seldom discussed and remain unclear in legislation. This lack of discussion influences legislative decisions based on personal or corporate interests, neglecting human dignity. It is important to respect patient autonomy to ensure a dignified death and to criminalize dysthanasia. The objective of this article is to present a narrative review of the literature on dithanasia and orthothanasia, using the BVS and SciELO databases. Additionally, a critical analysis of Rui Nunes’s work “Ensaios em Bioética” was performed. Eightteen relevant articles were selected, along with analyses of the Constitution, Medical Ethics Code, and Civil and Penal Codes, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal, social, and ethical aspects. Technologies that allow for the artificial prolongation of patient life influence the practice of dysthanasia, which is condemned by the Brazilian Medical Ethics Code. Quaternary prevention aims to protect patients from excessive interventions. However, Brazilian legislation on the end of life is scarce and confusing, leading to the marginalization of orthothanasia and the practice of dysthanasia by doctors. Legislative proposals often do not differentiate between euthanasia and dysthanasia, being influenced by moral and religious dogmas that disregard patient dignity. Expanding the debate on death and creating clear legislation will ensure patient autonomy, which is essential for guaranteeing a dignified death with orthothanasia and avoiding dysthanasia.
References
Barbosa, G., & Losurdo, F. (2018). Eutanásia no Brasil: entre o Código Penal e a dignidade da pessoa humana. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 5(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i2.52151. https://www.scielo.br/j/rinc/a/MKcqnSGvQrkG3z5HSHRkLhF/
Borges, S. A. R. P., Bastos, A. T. & Souza, L. P. (2018). Eutanásia no Projeto de Código Penal: Reflexões sobre o direito à vida e a autonomia da vontade na perspectiva constitucional. Unisanta Law and Social Science. 7, 140-164.
Berlinguer, G. (2004). Bioética Quotidiana (280 p.). Editora UnB.
Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM). (2014). Os limites da vida e as limitações da Justiça do Brasil. Brasília. https://portal.cfm.org.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24947:os-limites-davida-e-as-limitacoes-da-justica-do-brasil&catid=46:artigos&Itemid=18.
Conselho Federal de Medicina (2019). Código de Ética Médica (2018, modificada pelas Resoluções CFM nº 2.222/2018 e 2.226/2019). https://portal.cfm.org.br/images/PDF/cem2019.pdf.
Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, (1988). Brasília, DF: (Senado Federal).
Dantas, J. B., Borges, J. E., & Dutra, A. B. (2021). Entre a morte e a experiência da finitude: histórias e diálogos com o contemporâneo. Rev. Nufen: Phenom. Interd 13(1),41-55. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/rnufen/v13n1/v13n1a04.pdf
Eich, M., Verdi, M. I. M., Finkler, M., & Martins, P. P. S. (2023). Eutanásia Voluntária Ativa, Suicídio Assistido, Ortotanásia e os Cuidados Paliativos: um panorama das discussões no Poder Legislativo Federal Brasileiro. Rev Bio y Der, 59, 97-115. 10.1344/rbd2023.59.39640. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374919365_Eutanasia_Voluntaria_Ativa_Suicidio_Assistido_Ortotanasia_e_os_Cuidados_Paliativos_um_panorama_das_discussoes_no_Poder_Legislativo_Federal_Brasileiro.
Eich, M., Verdi, M. I. M., Finkler, M., & Martins, P. P. S. (2024). Práticas de Fim de Vida: Análise bioética dos projetos do Poder Legislativo brasileiro, 1981-2020. Saude soc, 33 (2) https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902024220871pt . https://www.scielosp.org/article/sausoc/2024.v33n2/e220871pt/
Felix, Z. C., da Costa, S. F. G., Alves, A. M. P. M., Andrade, C. G., Duarte, M. C. S., & Brito, F. M. (2013) Eutanásia, distanásia e ortotanásia: revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Bioética, 18(9) https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000900029. https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/6RQCX8yZXWWfC6gd7Gmg7fx/.
Gracia, D. (2004) Pensar a bioética: Metas e desafios (568 p.). [place unknown]: Edições Loyola.
Grau, E. (2018). Juízes interpretam e aplicam a Constituição e as leis, não fazem justiça. O Estado de S. Paulo, São Paulo, SP. https://www.conjur.com.br/2018-mai-14/eros-grau-juizes-interpretam-aplicam-constituicao-nao-fazem-justica.
Gonzaga, A. A., Falleiros, L. A. & Labruna, F. (2024). Morte digna como direito: visibilidade jurídica da finitude. Revista Brasileira de Bioética. 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420243629PT. https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/3629.
Heidegger, M. (2005) Ser e tempo. (15a ed.,162 p.). Vozes.
Ivankovics, I. G., Vieira, G. S. R., Faleiro, R. F., Vieira, T. F. M., Romanini, W. G. B., Nascimento, W. S., Júnior, C. R. H. M., Falqueti, A. B. & Nunes, R. (2023). Morte digna na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva: como ela tem sido conduzida?. Acta bioteth,, 29(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2023000200213. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2023000200213&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
Menezes, R. A., & Ventura, M. (2013). Ortotanásia, sofrimento e dignidade Entre valores morais, medicina e direito. Rev. bras. Ci. Soc, 28(31), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092013000100013 https://www.scielo.br/j/rbcsoc/a/KthhpN5JyP943XF7jQ8bMhc/.
Morais, I. M., Nunes, R., Cavalcanti, T. & Soares, A. K. S. (2016). Percepção da “morte digna” por estudantes e médicos. Revista Bioética, 1(24) 10.1590/1983-80422016241112. https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1193.
Norman, A. R. & Tesser, C. D. (2009). Prevenção quaternária na atenção primária à saúde: uma necessidade do Sistema Único de Saúde. Cad. Saúde Pública, 25(9) https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/csp/2009.v25n9/2012-2020/pt.
Nunes, R. (2017). Ensaios em Bioética Brasília. (280 p.). CFM, https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/csp/2009.v25n9/2012-2020/pt
Lei n° 7.209, de 11 de julho de 1984. Dos crimes contra a vida (Código Penal). Brasília, DF: Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm
Silva, J. A. C., Souza, L. E. A., Silva, L. C. & Teixeira, R. K. C. (2014). Distanásia e Ortotanásia: práticas médicas sob a visão de um hospital particular. Revista Bioética, 22(2) https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422014222017. https://www.scielo.br/j/bioet/a/BW7LqWvzQBmbyQrvhFjn3WH/?lang=pt#
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Helena Freitas Brandão Godói Godinho; Maria Eduarda Mota de Pinho; Lúcio Aparecido Moreira
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.