Accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in Fixed Implant Prosthesis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.6043

Keywords:

Dental Implant; Dental Impression Technique; Conventional impression; Digital impression; Dentistry.

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate digital or conventional fingerprints are essential in the manufacture of Implant Fixed Prostheses, however there is no consensus in the literature on which technique is best clinically. Objectives: To analyze the conventional and digital printing techniques in Fixed Implant Prosthesis, such as the factors: bone loss, marginal fit, mold accuracy, clinical time and dental surgeon knowledge about the techniques. Methodology: A literature review was carried out through the search for scientific articles of the last 10 years, in the Pubmed database. Titles, abstracts and access to the full text were verified and the research selected according to the inclusion criteria. Results: Surveys indicate that there are no significant differences in bone loss, marginal fit, and mold accuracy relative to conventional and digital prints. However, professionals do not report technical preference and digital technology presents a procedure with shorter clinical time. Conclusion: The number of randomized clinical trials that test digital implant workflows on implants is low. The knowledge and clinical management of the dental surgeon influences the choice of available techniques.

References

Abdel-Azim, T., Zandinejad, A., Elathamna, E., Lin, W., & Morton, D. (2014). The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant–Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29(6), 1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3577

Alshawaf, B., Weber, H.-P., Finkelman, M., El Rafie, K., Kudara, Y., & Papaspyridakos, P. (2018). Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(8), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13297

Cappare, P., Sannino, G., Minoli, M., Montemezzi, P., & Ferrini, F. (2019). Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050829

Ferrini, F., Capparé, P., Vinci, R., Gherlone, E. F., & Sannino, G. (2018). Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4149107

Flügge, T., van der Meer, W. J., Gonzalez, B. G., Vach, K., Wismeijer, D., & Wang, P. (2018). The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29, 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13273

Gherlone, E., Capparé, P., Vinci, R., Ferrini, F., Gastaldi, G., & Crespi, R. (2016). Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for “All-on-Four” Restorations. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 31(2), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3900

Guo, D. N., Liu, Y. S., Pan, S. X., Wang, P. F., Wang, B., Liu, J. Z., … Zhou, Y. S. (2019). Clinical Efficiency and Patient Preference of Immediate Digital Impression after Implant Placement for Single Implant-Supported Crown. The Chinese Journal of Dental Research : The Official Journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA), 22(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.a41771

Joda, T., Zarone, F., & Ferrari, M. (2017). The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health, 17(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0

Lee, S. J., Betensky, R. A., Gianneschi, G. E., & Gallucci, G. O. (2015). Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(6), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12375

Mühlemann, S., Greter, E. A., Park, J.-M., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Thoma, D. S. (2018). Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within-subject comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(9), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13349

Ribeiro, P., Herrero-Climent, M., Díaz-Castro, C., Ríos-Santos, J. V., Padrós, R., Mur, J. G., & Falcão, C. (2018). Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions—An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081599

Rutkūnas, V., Gečiauskaitė, A., Jegelevičius, D., & Vaitiekūnas, M. (2017). Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 10 Suppl 1, 101–120. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944372

Takeuchi, Y., Koizumi, H., Furuchi, M., Sato, Y., Ohkubo, C., & Matsumura, H. (2018). Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Oral Science, 60(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.17-0444

Tsirogiannis, P., Reissmann, D. R., & Heydecke, G. (2016). Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(3), 328–335.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028

Downloads

Published

01/10/2020

How to Cite

FREIRE, J. C. P.; MELO, W. O. de S. .; FIGUEIRÊDO JÚNIOR, E. C.; COSTA, B. P.; RIBEIRO, E. D. .; PEREIRA, J. V. Accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in Fixed Implant Prosthesis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 10, p. e4069106043, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.6043. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6043. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 10

Section

Health Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Julliana Cariry Palhano Freire, Waleska Ohana de Souza Melo, Ernani Canuto Figueirêdo Júnior, Bruna Palmeira Costa, Eduardo Dias Ribeiro, Jozinete Vieira Pereira

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.