Evaluation as an examination in the perception of nature sciences teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6845Keywords:
Evaluation; Examination; Teaching; Learning; Teacher training and practice.Abstract
In this article we present results of the empirical research that aimed to study the understanding of teachers of Natural Sciences in elementary education had on evaluation, to answer the following question: what are the perceptions of teachers of natural science on evaluation and examination? We used the semi-structured interview as a data collection technique applied to six teachers from the matogrossense state network in elementary schools, in the urban region of Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Data analysis was carried out through categorization during the process of critical-reflexive analysis of data from empirical research. The research data allowed us to verify of the six participating teachers, five perceived and practice the evaluation as examination, do not distinguish between both concepts and practices. That is, the predominant perception is to consider the examination as an evaluation that is due to two dominant factors: the examination is the predominant action in universities and schools, under the mask of “evaluation” (pseudo-evaluation) and; the absence of an evaluation study during teacher training. As examination is the determining practice during training, it is automatically transferred to school practices in basic education. Which refers to the need for a thorough curriculum and policy review of training programs and courses and teaching practices.
References
Condemarín, M., & Medina, A. (2205). Avaliação autêntica: um meio para melhorar as competências em linguagem e comunicação. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Hoffmann, J. M. L. (2018). Avaliação Mediadora: Uma Relação Dialógica na Construção do Conhecimento. s/d. Recuperado de http://www.crmariocovas.sp.gov.br/pdf/ideias_22_p051-059_c.pdf
Hoffmann, J. (2014a). Avaliação mediadora: uma prática em construção da pré-escola à universidade. (33a ed.), Porto Alegre: Mediação.
Hoffmann, J. (2014b). Avaliação: mito & desafio. (44a ed.), Porto Alegre: Mediação.
Hoffmann, J. (2007). O jogo do contrário em avaliação. (3a ed.), Porto Alegre: Mediação.
Kapitango-A-Samba, K. K. (2011). História e Filosofia da Ciência no Ensino de Ciências Naturais: o consenso e as perspectivas a partir de documentos oficiais, pesquisas e visões dos formadores. 2011.384 f. Tese (Doutorado) – Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo.
Luckesi, C. C. (2011a). Avaliação da aprendizagem Escolar: estudos e preposições. (22a ed.), São Paulo: Cortez.
Luckesi, C. C. (2011b). Avaliação da aprendizagem: componentes do ato pedagógico. São Paulo: Cortez.
Luckesi, C. C. (2000). O que é mesmo o ato de avaliar a aprendizagem? Pátio On-line. Porto alegre: ARTMED. 3 (12).
Luckesi, C. C. (2014). Sobre Notas Escolares: Distorções e possibilidades. São Paulo: Cortez.
Luckesi, C. C. (2018). Avaliação em educação. Recuperado de <http://luckesi.blogspot .com.br/>.
Russell, M. K., & Airasian, P. W. (2014). Avaliação em sala de aula. (7a ed.), Porto Alegre: AMGH Editora.
Vasconcellos, C. S. (2014). Avaliação classificatória e excludente e a inversão fetichizada da função social da escola. In: Fernandes, C. O. (Org). Avaliação das aprendizagens: sua relação com o papel social da escola. São Paulo: Cortez.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Elenita Bortolini Elenita Bortolini RADER, Kilwangy Kya Kapitango-a-Samba, Cilene Maria Lima Antunes Maciel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.