Analysis of labels of medicinal teas from formal trade and notes on the lack of concern for botanical nomenclature

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7346

Keywords:

Adulteration; Quality control; Package; Medicinal plants.

Abstract

This work analyzed the labels of medicinal teas from formal trade, according to the specific legislation. Thirty samples of herbal drugs included in the Form of Phytotherapeutics of the Brazilian Pharmacopeia were photographed in commercial establishments in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, and analyzed according to the Resolution of Anvisa RDC 26/2014 and the Form. Information related to the botanical nomenclature, plant part, guidelines for preparation, warnings, claims, and orientations for use was inconsistent with the official standards in most samples, and 77% were marketed as food products, although the studied species are not regulated for the commercialization in the food area. The consumption of herbal products in disagreement with the official recommendations may cause toxic effects or lack of the expected benefits. The irregularities identified suggest the absence or failure in quality control and a lack of concern for the scientific botanical nomenclature, exposing the public health to risks.

References

Baker, J. G. (1876). Flora Brasiliensis (Martius), 6(2), 241. Retrieved from: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/139777

Bennett, B. C. & Balick, M. J. (2014). Does the name really matter? The importance of botanical nomenclature and plant taxonomy in biomedical research. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 152(3), 387-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.11.042

Biral, L. & Lombardi, J. A. (2012). (2057) Proposal to conserve the name Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex Reissek against M. ilicifolia (Schrad.) Planch. (Celastraceae). Taxon, 61(2), 468-469. doi: 10.1002/tax.612022

Biral, L.; Simmons, M. P.; Smidt, E. C.; Tembrock, L. R.; Bolson, M.; Archer, R. H. & Lombardi, J. A. (2017). Systematics of new world Maytenus (Celastraceae) and a new delimitation of the genus. Systematic Botany, 42(4), 680-693. doi: 10.1600/036364417X696456

Bochner, R.; Fiszon, J. T.; Assis, M. A. & Avelar, K. E. S. (2012). Problems associated with the use of medicinal plants commercialized in “Mercadão de Madureira", Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Medicinal Plants, 14(3), 537-547. doi: 10.1590/S1516-05722012000300017

Bouman, R. W.; Keβler, P. J. A.; Telford, I. R. H.; Bruhl, J. J. & van Welzen, P. C. (2018). Subgeneric delimitation of the plant genus Phyllanthus (Phyllanthaceae). Blumea - Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants, 63(2), 167-198. doi: 10.3767/blumea.2018.63.02.14

Brazil. (1940). Decree-Law 2.848, of December 7, 1940. Brasília. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848.htm

Brazil. (1990). Law 8.072, of July 25, 1990. Brasília. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8072.htm

Brazil. (2002). RDC 259, of September 20, 2002. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/2718376/%281%29RDC_259_2002_COMP.pdf/556a749c-50ea-45e1-9416-eff2676c4b22

Brazil. (2005a). RDC 267, of September 22, 2005. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/2718376/RDC_267_2005_COMP.pdf/cdadfeb0-57c2-4dc6-910a-ef8c9e3b3bf7

Brazil. (2005b). RDC 277, of September 22, 2005. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/2718376/RDC_277_2005_.pdf/9e6c0934-a549-49ba-9b11-778f857ab7e8

Brazil. (2006). RDC 219, of September 22, 2006. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33880/2568070/RDC_219_2006.pdf/59ace1c3-a1f8-43e3-81de-bb3f13a83ad7

Brazil. (2011). Form of Phytotherapeutics of the Brazilian Pharmacopeia. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33832/259456/Formulario_de_Fitoterapicos_da_Farmacopeia_Brasileira.pdf/c76283eb-29f6-4b15-8755-2073e5b4c5bf

Brazil. (2014). RDC 26, of May 13, 2014. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/10181/3171284/%282%29RDC_26_2014_COMP.pdf/a3eae635-fec3-4936-b836-65e8fe7a8e12

Brazil. (2018). First Supplement of the Form of Phytotherapeutics of the Brazilian Pharmacopeia. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33832/259456/Suplemento+FFFB.pdf/478d1f83-7a0d-48aa-9815-37dbc6b29f9a

Brazil. (2019). Brazilian Pharmacopeia, v. 2, 6th ed. Brasília: Anvisa. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33832/259143/Plantas+medicinais+Pronto.pdf/1b7220eb-a371-4ad4-932c-365732a9c1b8

Colet, C. F.; Dal Molin, G. T.; Cavinatto, A. W.; Baiotto, C. S. & Oliveira, K. R. (2015). Análises das embalagens de plantas medicinais comercializadas em farmácias e drogarias do município de Ijuí/RS. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 17(2), 331-339. doi: 10.1590/1983-084X/13_027

Farah, M. H.; Olsson, S.; Bate, J.; Lindquist, M.; Edwards, R.; Simmonds, M. S.; Leon, C.; Boer, H. J. & Thulin, M. (2006). Botanical nomenclature in pharmacovigilance and a recommendation for standardisation. Drug Safety, 29(11), 1023-1029. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629110-00002

Flora do Brasil. (2020). Mikania In: Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB5344

Gaglioti, A. L. & Araújo, F. M. (2020). Boehmeria In: Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB15035

Kunle, O. F.; Egharevba, H. O. & Ahmadu, P. O. (2012). Standardization of herbal medicines - A review. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 4(3), 101-112. doi: 10.5897/IJBC11.163

Leal-Costa, M. V.; Teodoro, F. S.; Barbieri, C.; Santos, L. F. U. D. & Sousa, A. D. (2018). Quality assessment of medicinal plants marketed in the Municipal Market of Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ. Fitos, 12(2), 127-134. doi: 10.5935/2446-4775.20180012

Lehtonen, S. (2008). An integrative approach to species delimitation in Echinodorus (Alismataceae) and the description of two new species. Kew Bulletin, 63(4), 525-563. doi: 10.1007/s12225-008-9068-0

Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum, 2, 981. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/359002

Matias, L. Q. (2020). Alismataceae In: Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Rio de Janeiro: Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB4257

Micheli, M. (1881). Monographiae Phanerogamarum [A.DC. & C.DC.], 3, 50. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32080989

Nascimento, V. T.; Lacerda, E. U.; Melo, J. G.; Lima, C. S. A.; Amorim, E. L. C. & Albuquerque, U. P. (2005). Quality control of medicinal plant products commercialized in the city of Recife (Pernambuco, Brazil): erva-doce (Pimpinella anisum L.), quebra-pedra (Phyllanthus spp.) espinheira santa (Maytenus ilicifolia Mart.) and chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.). Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 7(3), 56-64. Retrieved from http://www.sbpmed.org.br/download/issn_05_3/artigo8_v7_n3.pdf

Nesbitt, M.; McBurney, R. P.; Broin, M. & Beentje, H. J. (2010). Linking biodiversity, food and nutrition: The importance of plant identification and nomenclature. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23(6), 486-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2009.03.001

Niero, R.; Faloni de Andrade, S. & Cechinel Filho, V. (2011). A review of the ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of plants of the Maytenus genus. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 17(18), 1851-1871. doi: 10.2174/138161211796391029

Pereira A.S.; Shitsuka, D.M.; Parreira, F.J. & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Santa Maria, Brasil: UAB/NTE/UFSM. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.

Peruzzi, L. (2020). Using scientific names guarantees universality of communication in science… but are plant biologists aware of it? Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2020.1736203

Shaw, D.; Graeme, L.; Pierre, D.; Elizabeth, W. & Kelvin, C. (2012). Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 140(3), 513-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.01.051

Sprengel, C. P. J. (1826). Systema Vegetabilium, 16(3), 421. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/792773

Turland, N. J.; Wiersema, J. H.; Barrie, F. R.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D. L.; Herendeen, P. S.; Knapp S.; Kusber, W. H.; Li, D. Z.; Marhold, K.; May, T. W.; Mcneill, J.; Monro, A. M.; Prado, J.; Price, M. J. & Smith, G. F. (2018). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Koeltz Botanical Books. doi: https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018

Vega, A. J. & Dematteis, M. (2010). The transfer of Vernonia perangusta to the genus Vernonanthura (Vernonieae, Asteraceae) and the correct name for Vernonanthura phosphorica. Phytotaxa, 8(1), 46-50. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.8.1.5

Zhang, J.; Wider, B.; Shang, H.; Li, X. & Ernst, E. (2012). Quality of herbal medicines: challenges and solutions. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 20(1-2), 100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.09.004

Zhao, Z.; Hu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Yuen, J. P. S.; Jiang, Z. & Leung, K. S. Y. (2006). Authentication is fundamental for standardization of Chinese medicines. Planta Medica, 72(10), 865-874. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-947209

Downloads

Published

23/08/2020

How to Cite

Amaral, F. M. do, Monteiro, S. de S. R., Leitão, J. da C. P., Paiva, S. R. de, & Joffily, A. (2020). Analysis of labels of medicinal teas from formal trade and notes on the lack of concern for botanical nomenclature. Research, Society and Development, 9(9), e435997346. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7346

Issue

Section

Health Sciences