Expense savings through technology acceptance: Analysis of the adoption of electronic systems in public institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16807Keywords:
Theory of acceptance and use of technology; Expense economics; Electronic system computerized in public institutions.Abstract
This study seeks to analyze the cost savings in public institutions through the Acceptance and Use of technology in the computerization of electronic processes. In this sense, the Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is used to explain adherence to a procedural system of electronic processing, which replaces paper and other office supplies to improve performance resulting from resource savings. It is an exploratory, descriptive and explanatory research as to the objective, carried out through document analysis with a quantitative approach. To achieve the proposed objective, expenses were raised before and after the implementation of the computerized electronic system in 94 federal executive branches, between 2011 and 2020. Based on the construction of two research hypotheses, the analyzes used the test of Wilcoxon to verify the difference in the execution of expenses with the system implement, but also Factor Analysis combined with the Kruskall-Wallis test to identify a possible systemic behavior change in costs arising from the use of electronic systems. The results show that the adoption of the system alone may not provide sufficient arguments for adherence to the technology. However, based on the theoretical component, the arguments of agility, ease of use and information security are relevant in government action for the decision-making process of managers.
References
Bhatiasevi, V. (2016). An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking. Information Development. 32(4), 799-814.
Cabrera-Sanchez, J-P., & Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F. (2019). Fatores que Afetam a Adoção de Análises de Big Data em Empresas. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 59(6), 415-429.
Carrera-Mora, Ó., Ovando, C., Villafuerte, L., & Parada, A. (2019). La relación de la perspectiva de eficiencia del ciudadano con su comportamiento de uso de los servicios de e-gobierno municipal. INNOVAR. 29(74), 133-146.
Fulton, D. C. P., Farias, J. S., Alfinito, S., & Almeida, J. P. L. (2018). Adoção ao Sistema Eletrônico de Informações (SEI) pelo Ministério da Justiça: uma avaliação na ótica dos usuários. Revista do Serviço Público. 69(4), 1015 - 1036.
Giacomoni, J.(2019). Orçamento Governamental: teoria, sistema, processo. Atlas.
Gross, J., & Ligges, U. (2015). Nortest: Tests for Normality. R package version1.0-4.
Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior. 28(6), 2340-2350.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babim, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados. (6a ed.), Bookman.
Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. The R Journal. 6(2), 151-162.
Magsamen-Conrad, K., Upadhyaya, S., Joa, C. Y., & Dowd, J. (2015). Bridging the divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Computers in Human Behavior. 50(1), 186-196.
Maier, M. J. (2015). Companion Package to the Book ``R: Einführung durch angewandte Statistik''.Rpackage version0.9.3,http://CRAN.R-project.org/package= REdaS>.
Matias-Pereira, J. (2018). Administração Pública: foco nas instituições e ações governamentais. (5a ed.). Atlas.
ME. (2020). Processo Eletrônico Nacional. Ministério da Economia. <https://www.gov.br/economia/pt-br/assuntos/processo-eletronico-nacional>.
Mosweu, O., & Bwalya, K. J. (2018). A multivariate analysis of the determinants for adoption and use of the Document Workflow Management System in Botswana’s public sector. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 84(2), 27-38.
Nowak, M. A. M. (2018). A Utilização do Sistema Eletrônico de Informações - SEI no Serviço Público: inovação tecnológica para melhoria na eficiência administrativa e no conhecimento institucional. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Federal do Paraná. Setor de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Econômico.
Ossani, P. C, & Cirillo, M. A. (2020). MVar.pt: Analise multivariada. R package version 2.1.3.
Palos-Sanchez, P., Reyes-Menendez, A., & Saura, J. R. (2019). Modelos de Adopción de Tecnologías de la Información y Cloud Computing en las Organizaciones. Información Tecnológica. 30(3), 3-12.
Purnama, D. E., Cahyono, A. D., & Wijaya, A. F. (2020). Performance Analysis of Information System / Information Technology using COBIT 4.1 (PT. Global Infotech Solution). Journal of Information Systems and Informatics. 2(1), 105-113.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Sherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 27, 90-109.
Steccolini, I. (2019). Accounting and the post-new public management: Re-considering publicness in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 32(1), 255-279.
STN. (2020). Sistema Tesouro Gerencial. Ministério da Economia. Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional. <https://tesourogerencial.tesouro.gov.br /servlet/mstrWeb?pg=login>.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27(3), 425-478.
Zhao, Y., NI, Q., & Zhou, R. (2018). What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age. International Journal of Information Management. 43, 342-350.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Saulo Silva Lima Filho; Blênio Cezar Severo Peixe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.