Challenges and paradigms for the exercise of preceptorship in face of formative feedback in Nursing residencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.19849Keywords:
Formative feedback; Nursing; Non-medical boarding school; Preceptorship; Nursing Education.Abstract
Objective: to identify, through a literature search, the evidence surrounding the importance of feedback, as well as the challenges and paradigms for the exercise of preceptorship and formative feedback in the context of nursing residencies. Method: Research with a qualitative approach, with a descriptive nature, of the Integrative Literature Review typology. Data collection took place based on the following inclusion criteria: Texts with abstracts and available completely online; articles in Portuguese and English; studies published from 2016 to 2021. The question that guided the search was: "What is the evidence in the databases on the exercise of preceptorship in face of formative feedback in nursing homes?". The databases used were Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and BDENF – Nursing, through the Virtual Health Library Portal with Descriptors – controlled descriptors – formative feedback; Nursing; Non-medical boarding school; Preceptorship; Nursing Education; Graduate nursing education; and with the keywords – uncontrolled descriptors: Graduate; Feedback and Preceptor. Results: 7 articles were selected, which were analyzed and originated 3 categories. 1) The importance of Formative Feedback in training in residencies; 2) The role of the Nurse preceptor with the residents and with the Formative Feedback and 3) Barriers for the performance of preceptorship in homes and the Formative Feedback process. Final Considerations: From this literature review, it was possible to identify the importance of formative feedback, as well as preceptorship in the environment of nursing homes.
References
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, São Paulo, ed. 70, p. 229.
Borges, M. C., Miranda, C. H., Santana, R. C., & Bollela, V. R. (2014). Avaliação formativa e feedback como ferramenta de aprendizado na formação de profissionais da saúde. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto), 47(3), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v47i3p324-331
Brasil (1996). Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Anteprojeto de Lei nº 2.264/1996. Dispõe sobre a Residência em Enfermagem e a sua respectiva Comissão Nacional. Rio de Janeiro. https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=17872
Brasil (2014). Ministério da Educação. Resolução n° 5, de 7 de novembro de 2014. Dispõe sobre a duração e a carga horária dos programas de Residência em Área Profissional da Saúde nas modalidades multiprofissional e uniprofissional e sobre a avaliação e a frequência dos profissionais da saúde residentes. Diário Oficial União. https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=276672
Fajardo, A. P., Rocha, C. M. F., & Pasini, V. L. (2010). Grupo Hospitalar Conceição. Residências em saúde: fazeres e saberes na formação em saúde. Porto Alegre: Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição.
Ferreira, F. D. C., Dantas, F. C., & Valente, G. S. C. (2018). Nurses’ knowledge and competencies for preceptorship in the basic health unit. Rev Bras Enferm, 71(Suppl 4):1564-1571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0533
Filho, J. F. R., & Santos, C. S. (2018). Residência em enfermagem: identificação das atividades de preceptoria em um Hospital escola. O Mundo da Saúde, 42(2), 333-348. https://revistamundodasaude.emnuvens.com.br/mundodasaude/article/view/127
Freitas, B. T. P., Sé, A. C. S., da Silva Gonçalves, R. C., & Pereira, G. L. (2021). Contribuições e desafios da preceptoria nos Programas de Residência em Enfermagem. Research, Society and Development, 10(5), e37510514996-e37510514996. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14996
Hodges, A. L., Konicki, A. J., Talley, M. H., Bordelon, C. J., Holland, A. C., & Galin, F. S. (2019). Competency-based education in transitioning nurse practitioner students from education into practice. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 31(11), 675-682. https:// doi:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000327
Johnson, C. E., Keating, J. L., Farlie, M. K., Kent, F., Leech, M., & Molloy, E. K. (2019). Educators’ behaviours during feedback in authentic clinical practice settings: an observational study and systematic analysis. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1524-z
Kim, E. J., & Lee, K. R. (2019). Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x
Manhães, L. S. P., de Melo Tavares, C. M., Ferreira, R. E., Marcondes, F. L., da Silveira, P. G., & Lima, T. O. (2017). Experiential knowledge of nursing residence preceptors: an ethnographic study. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 16(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20175464
Martins, G. M., Caregnato, R. C. A., Barroso V. L. M., & Ribas, D. C. P. (2016). Implementação de residência multiprofissional em saúde de uma universidade federal: trajetória histórica. Rev Gaúcha Enferm, 37(3):e57046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2016.03.57046.
Martins, L. S., & Scarcella, M. F. S. (2020). Elaboração de projeto pedagógico para preceptoria de enfermeiros em terapia intensiva cardiológica. Nursing (São Paulo), 23(269), 4695-4702. https://doi.org/10.36489/nursing.2020v23i269p4695-4702
Melo, M. C. D., Queluci, G. D. C., & Gouvêa, M. V. (2014). Problematizando a residência multiprofissional em oncologia: protocolo de ensino prático na perspectiva de residentes de enfermagem. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(4), 706-714. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000400019
Ribeiro, P. K. C., Firmo, W. C. A., Sousa, M. H. S. L., Figueiredo, I. A., & Pacheco, M. A. B. (2020). Os profissionais de saúde e a prática de preceptoria na atenção básica: assistência, formação e transformações possíveis. Journal of Management & Primary Health Care, 12, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14295/jmphc.v12.977
Santos, A. D. S., Castro, L. M. C., Fagundes, N. C., & Vieira, D. F. V. B. (2017). Análise do processo formativo de uma residência de enfermagem em terapia intensiva. Revista Baiana de Enfermagem, 31(4). https://cienciasmedicasbiologicas.ufba.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/viewFile/22771/15399
Schumacher, G., & Risco, K. (2017). Competency-based nurse practitioner education: an overview for the preceptor. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 13(9), 596-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.07.020
Sousa, L. M. M., Marques-Vieira, C. M. A., Severino, S. S. P., & Antunes, A. V. (2017). A metodologia de revisão integrativa da literatura em enfermagem. Revista investigação em enfermagem, 21(2), 17-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321319742_Metodologia_de_Revisao_Integrativa_da_Literatura_em_Enfermagem
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Carlos Antonio Farias Sales Junior; Ilma Pastana Ferreira; Ruhan da Conceição Sacramento; Marcella Lacerda Moura; Vera Regina da Cunha Menezes Palacios; Márcia Bitar Portella; Larissa Cristina Machado de Barros
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
