The paradox of human nature: fundamentals of Human Rights based on LGBTI+ rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23105Keywords:
Human Rights Theory; LGBTI rights; Human nature.Abstract
In the classic theories about Human Rights, these are thought to stem from a certain "human nature", in the sense that such rights would immediately be derived from a founding dignity of the "human" category. Such a simple statement, however, is paradoxical with the immense difficulty in guaranteeing human rights to entire communities, especially when exclusionary ways of understanding the human are in operation, linked to nationalisms, racializations, or to experiences of gender and sexuality understood as “deviants”. In the latter, the paradox of human nature is shown in its crudity, given that the experiences of LGBTI + groups have historically been identified as “unnatural”. The demands for rights of LGBTI + people, therefore, have been accompanied in the world context by a demand to integrate the category of the human, including appealing, in some cases, to bio-ontological understandings of the definition of human sexuality as a key argument. Such a posture has the evident objective of naturalizing the LGBTI + experience, thus disputing which bodily and sexual experiences the category of the human can “naturally” contain. With the aim of exploring and questioning the narrated reality and through an essayist-based methodology, this article demonstrates that such a movement shows a paradox: while the foundation in human nature is often placed as a way to protect the rights of exclusionary and reductionist tendencies, it is in itself exclusionary, in the sense that "human nature" does not have a unique ontological meaning to be discovered, but is itself socially defined. In developing this problem, this work seeks to dialogue with perspectives of contemporary philosophy, and specially with Judith Butler’s work, which show us that all ontology, especially that related to sexual and gender identities, is historical. So is “human nature”, and it is necessary to question the meanings it occupies as the foundation of human rights. In a provisory conclusion, it is proposed to think about human rights from contingent foundations, in the sense brought by Butler, which, in order to fulfill their role of expanding livable forms of life, must always remain open to contestation and to the expansion of their borders, including new human experiences.
References
Adorno, T. W. (2003). Notas de Literatura I. São Paulo: Ed. 34
Andrade, R. C. (2000) Kant: a liberdade, o indivíduo e a república. In: Weffort, F. (org.). Os clássicos da política, v. 2. São Paulo: Ática. Pp. 47-100
Bernstein, M., & Reimann,, R. (2001) Queer Families and the Politics of Visibility. In: Bernstein, M., & Reimann, R. (ed.). Queer families, queer politics. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 01-18
Butler, J. (1998) Fundamentos contingentes: o feminismo e a questão do ‘pós-modernismo’. Cadernos pagu, 11, 11-42
Butler, J. (2003). O parentesco é sempre tido como heterossexual? Cadernos Pagu, 21, 219-260
Butler, J. (2007). El gênero en disputa: El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Trad. Antonia Muñoz. Barcelona: Espasa Libros
Butler, J. (2015). Quadros de Guerra: quando a vida é passivel de luto? Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira
Butler, J. (2017). Relatar a si mesmo: crítica da violência ética. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica Editora
Butler, J. (2018). Corpos em aliança e a política das ruas: notas para uma teoria performativa de assembleia. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Costa, P. (2012). Poucos, muitos, todos: lições de história da democracia. Curitiba: Editora UFPR
Dos Santos, A. R. B. (2019) Feminismos em tradução: por uma perspectiva dialógica dos direitos humanos das mulheres. In: Bertotti, B. M., Viana, A. C. A., Kreuz, L. R. C., Caleffi, R. (orgs.) Gênero & Resistência: memórias do II Encontro de Pesquisa por/de/sobre Mulheres, vol. 1. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, p. 165-186
Felski, R. (1995). The Gender of Modernity. Harvard College: United States of America
Flores, J. H. (2009) A (re)invenção dos Direitos Humanos. Florianópolis: Fundação Boiteux
Formento, J. dos A. S, & Almeida, S. dos S. de. (2020). Violência homofóbica: Revisão sistemática da literatura. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e848974939
Foucault, M. (2008). Segurança, Território e População: curso dado no Collège de France (1977-1978). São Paulo: Martins Fontes
Foucault, M. (2010) Em defesa da sociedade: curso no Collège de France (1975-1976). São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes
Foucault, M. (2014). História da Sexualidade: a vontade de saber. São Paulo: Paz e Terra
Haider-Markel, D. P. (2001) Defense, Morality, Civil Rights, and Family: The Evolution of Lesbian and Gay Issues in the U.S. Congress. In: Bernstein, M. & R., R. (ed.). Queer families, queer politics. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 358-378
Hunt, L. (2012). A invenção dos direitos humanos: uma história. Curitiba: A Página
Jackson, S. (1998) Sexual politics: feminist politics, gay politics and the problem of heterosexuality. In: Carver, T., & Mottier, V. (editors). Politics of Sexuality: identity, gender, citizenship. Routledge: London and New York, p. 68-78
Kingdom, E. (1991). What’s wrong with rights? Problems for Feminist Politics of Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2019). Da colonialidade dos Direitos Humanos. In: Santos, B. S., & Martins, B. S. (orgs). O pluriverso dos direitos humanos: a diversidade das lutas pela dignidade. Lisboa: Edições 70, p. 93-119
Miskolci, R. (2007). Pânicos morais e controle social – reflexões sobre o casamento gay. Cadernos Pagu, n. 28, 101-128.
Miskolci, R., & Campana, M. (2017) “Ideologia de gênero”: notas para a genealogia de um pânico moral contemporâneo. Revista Sociedade e Estado, 32 (3), p. 725-747
Morrison, W. (2006). Filosofia do Direito: dos gregos ao pós-modernismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes
Mouffe, C. (1996). O regresso do político: trajectos. Lisboa: Gradiva Publicações
Paiva, A. C. S. (2007). Reserva e Invisibilidade: a construção da homoconjugalidade numa perspectiva micropolítica. In: Grossi, M., Uziel, A. P., Mello, L. Conjugalidades, Parentalidades e Identidades Lésbicas, Gays e Travestis. Rio de Janeiro. Garamond.
Ribeiro, L. P., Zanin, H. da S., Silva, I. P. da, & Dias, A. F. M. (2020). Políticas organizacionais de inclusão: Práticas de respeito às minorias sexuais e de gênero. Research, Society and Development, 9(1), e176911894
Ruzyk, C. E. P. (2019). A Metodologia do Direito Civil no pensamento de Luiz Edson Fachin. In: Ehrhardt Junior, M., & Cortiano Junior, E. (coord.). Transformações no Direito Privado nos 30 anos da Constituição: estudos em homenagem a Luiz Edson Fachin. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, p. 27-35
Santos, B. S., & Martins, B. S. (2019). Introdução. In: Santos, B. S., & Martins, B. S. (orgs). O pluriverso dos direitos humanos: a diversidade das lutas pela dignidade. Lisboa: Edições 70, p. 11-37
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Andressa Regina Bissolotti dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.