Nursing team perceptions about the use of a check list for counting surgical material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29446Keywords:
Surgicenters; Nursing; Patient safety.Abstract
The objective was to analyze the perception of professionals in relation to the practice of counting surgical material and their needs in relation to the checklist for counting surgical material. For that, a qualitative study of the descriptive type was carried out, in the years 2018 and 2019, in three surgical centers in hospitals in a Brazilian municipality located in the interior of the state of Ceará. The participants were mid-level and higher-level nursing workers working in the surgical centers of these hospitals, totaling 138 employees. Questionnaires, forms and conversation circles were used for data collection. For the analysis, it was anchored in the categorical content analysis proposed by Bardin, which had the help of the Nvivo software. Thus, two categories emerged: Perceptions of nursing professionals about the surgical material counting checklist and Contributions to the improvement of the surgical material counting checklist. Initially, the implementation of the routine of checking and verifying the surgical material was considered by the professionals as something difficult and without the need to be used, however, after qualification and training, they started to consider it as a measure that provides support for their practice, however it is important that it occurs jointly with the other professionals involved in the surgical act. Furthermore, the instruments suited to the profile and the assistance characteristics of the institution stand out. Thus, practices for safe surgery involve all members of the surgical team, however, in most cases, this attribution is the responsibility of the nursing team.
References
Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses. (2010). Recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items.
Azevedo, D. K. L., Silva, C. M. P., & Maia, A. L. O papel da gestão de enfermagem na implementação da meta de cirurgia segura: uma revisão de literatura. Res., Soc. Dev, 10 (14), 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.22711
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. (2007). Práticas seguras para prevenção de retenção não intencional de objetos após realização de procedimento cirúrgico em serviços de saúde. Brasília: ANVISA.
Ceará. (2016). Caderno de Informação em Saúde: Região de Saúde de Sobral. Sobral: Governo do Estado do Ceará.
Edel, E. M. (2012). Surgical count practice variability and the potential for retained surgical items. Aorn Journal, 95 (2), 228-238. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.02.014.
Gitelis, M. E., Kaczynski, A., Shear, T., Deshur, M., Beig, M., & Sefa, M. (2017) Increasing compliance with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist-A regional health system's experience. Sou J Surg, 214 (1), 7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.024
Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2009). Técnicas de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas S.A.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2013). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Motta Filho, G. R., Silva, L. F. N., Ferracini, A. M., & Bärh, G. L. (2013). Protocolo de cirurgia segura da OMS: o grau de conhecimento dos ortopedistas brasileiros. Rev. Bras. Ortop, 48 (6), 554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.rbo.2013.08.002.
Moura, A. F., & Lima, M. G. (2014). A Reinvenção da Roda: Roda de Conversa, um instrumento metodológico possível. Revista Temas Em Educação, 23 (1), 95–103.
Pancieri, A. P., Santos, B. P., Ávila, M. A. G., & Braga, E. M. (2013). Checklist de cirurgia segura: análise da segurança e comunicação das equipes de um hospital escola. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm, 34 (1), 71-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-14472013000100009
Prates, C. G., Stadñik, C. M. B., BagatinI, A., Caregnato, R. C., & Moura, G. M. S. S. (2018). Comparação das taxas de infecção cirúrgica após implantação do checklist de segurança. Acta Paul Enferm, 31 (2), 116-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201800018
Ribeiro, H. C. T. C., Quites, G. F. O., Bredes, A. C., Souza, K. A. S., & Alves, M. (2017). Adesão ao preenchimento do checklist de segurança cirúrgica. Cad. Saúde Pública, 33 (10), 1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00046216
Rocha, R. G., Batista, D. B. S., Pereira, E. R., Almeida, L. F., Fassarella, C. S., Tavares, J. M. A. B., & Broca, P. V. (2020). Limitações na implementação da lista de checagem de cirurgia e impactos na segurança do paciente cirúrgico. Res., Soc. Dev, 9 (9), 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7089
Romano, A. C. L., & Oliveira, A. A. S. (2017). Segurança do paciente cirúrgico e direitos humanos dos pacientes. Cad. Ibero-Amer. Dir. Sanit, 6 (3), 232-251. doi: https://doi.org/10.17566/ciads.v6i3.397
Salles, C. L. S., Carrara, D., & Kusahara, D. M. (2011). Boas Práticas: cirurgia segura. São Paulo: COREN. Retrieved from: http://coren-sp.gov.br/sites/default/files/cirurgia-segura.pdf
Santos, E. A., Domingues, A. N., & Eduardo, A. H. A. (2020). Lista de verificação para segurança cirúrgica: conhecimento e desafios para a equipe do centro cirúrgico. Enferm. Actual Costa Rica, (38), 75-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revenf.v0i38.37285
Silveira, I. M., Fernandes, L. S. L., Lopes, T. P., Araújo, L. M., Rocha, F. C. V., & Oliveira, A. D. S. (2018). Cirurgia segura: recomendações adotadas antes da indução anestésica. Rev Pre Infec e Saúde, 4, 72-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.26694/repis.v4i0.7285
Weiser, T. G., Regenbogen, S. E., Thompson, K. D., Haynes, A. B., Lipsitz, S. R., & Berry, W. R. (2008). An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet, 372 (9633), 139-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonia Abigail do Nascimento Cavalcante; Maria Salete Bessa Jorge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
