Comparison of four serological tests for the diagnosis of swine brucellosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4418Keywords:
Fluorescence polarization; Complement fixation; Rose Bengal; Tube agglutination; Brucella suis.Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present results of a research in which the results of four serological tests were compared for the diagnosis of swine brucellosis in pigs from Brazilian herds in which the outbreak occurred in relation to other brucellosis-free. Rose Bengal (RBT), complement fixation (CFT), agglutination plus 2-mercaptoethanol test (TAT+ME), and commercial fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) were used to test 333 sera (271 sows and 62 finishing pigs) from a Brucella suis infected swine herd and 1,100 swine sera from brucellosis free pigs taken at a slaughterhouse. Considering infected all the 271 sows from the outbreak, and interpreting results of the FPA according to the manufacturer directions, sensitivities observed were 95.94% for FPA, 94.83% for RBT, 93.73% for CFT, and 92.25% for TAT+ME. Considering infected all the pigs from the infected herd with a positive result in at least one test, sensitivities observed were 98.92% for RBT, 97.13% for CFT, 96.06% for FPA, and 94.98% for TAT+ME. Specificities of the tests were CFT and TAT+ME, 100%; FPA, 99.55%; and RBT 99.27%. Results indicated a good performance of all the tests, and the agreement among them was almost perfect.
References
Alton, GG, Jones, LM, Angus, RD & Verger, JM. (1988). Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Institut Nacional de la Recherche Agronomique.
Brasil. (2017). Instrução normativa nº 10, de 3 de março de 2017. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. http://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/19124587/do1-2017%E2%80%9306-20-instrucao-normativa-n-10-de-3-de-marco-de-2017%E2%80%9319124353
Di Febo, T, Luciani, M, Portanti, O, Bonfini, B, Lelli, R & Tittarelli, M. (2012). Development and evaluation of diagnostic tests for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis in swine. Veterinaria Italiana, 48 (2), 145-56. http://www.izs.it/vet_italiana/2012/48_2/145.pdf
Dohoo, I, Martin, W & Stryhn, H. (2009). Veterinary epidemiologic research. Ver Inc.
Jacobson, RH. (1998). Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 17 (2), 469-86. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.17.2.1119
Landis, RR & Kock, GG. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1), 159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
MacMillan, AP. (1999). Brucellosis. In: Straw, BE, D´Allaire, S, Mengeling, WL & Taylor, DM (Eds.), Diseases of swine (pp. 385-39). Blackwell Publishing.
Meirelles-Bartoli, RB, Mathias, LA & Samartino, LE. (2012). Brucellosis due to Brucella suis in a swine herd associated with a human clinical case in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44 (7), 1575-1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0108-2
Musser, JMB, Schwartz, AL, Srinath, I & Waldrup, KA. (2013). Use of serology and bacterial culture to determine prevalence of Brucella spp. in feral swine (Sus scrofa) in proximity to a beef cattle herd positive for Brucella suis and Brucella abortus. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 49, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.7589/2012-06-169
Nielsen, K, Gall, D, Jolley, M, Leishman, G, Balsevicius, S, Smith, P, Nicoletti, P & Thomas, F. (1996). A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus. Journal of Immunological Methods, 195 (1-2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(96)00116-0
Nielsen, K., Gall, D., Smith, P., Vigliocco, A., Perez, B., Samartino, L., Nicoletti, P., Dajer, A., Elzer, P., & Enright, F. (1999). Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay as a serological test for the presumptive diagnosis of porcine brucellosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 68 (3-4), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00077-2
Pereira, AS, Shitsuka, DM, Parreira, FJ & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Praud, A., Gimenez, O., Zanella, G., Dufour, B., Pozzi, N., Antras, V., Meyer, L., & Garin-Bastuji, B. (2012). Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 104 (1-2), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.10.014
Silva Paulo, P., Vigliocco, A. M., Ramondino, R. F., Marticorena, D., Bissi, E., Briones, G., Gorchs, C., Gall, D., & Nielsen, K., (2000). Evaluation of primary binding assays for presumptive serodiagnosis of swine brucellosis in Argentina. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 7 (5), 828-831. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128%2Fcdli.7.5.828-831.2000
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
Stoffregen, W. C., Olsen, S. C., Wheeler, C. J., Bricker, B. J., Palmer, M. V., Jensen, A. E., Halling, S. M., & Alt, D. P. (2007). Diagnostic characterization of a feral swine herd enzootically infected with Brucella. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 19, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104063870701900301
Thrusfield, M. (2005). Veterinary epidemiology. Blackwell Publishing.
World Organization for Animal Health (2009). Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. OIE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.