Alginate versus addition silicone: What is the best material for removable partial dentures?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v13i7.46223

Keywords:

Removable partial denture; Silicones; Alginates.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to create a narrative literature review article, covering two different types of materials: silicone and alginate, with the aim of seeing which is the best material to compose a removable partial denture. Methodology: The searches were carried out in PUBMED Central, Web of Science, VHL/BIREME, Brazilian CAPES, Scielo and using the Google Academy portal. A total of 24 articles were acquired that address the benefits and harms of using silicone and alginate in removable partial dentures, in addition to their differences. We consult periodicals and books, aiming to obtain more reliable information on the topic. In order to carry out a literature review, the vision of Mattos (2015) was used to structure the article. Results: During the study, it was seen that addition silicone is widely considered the best material due to its high precision, excellent ability to reproduce details and superior dimensional stability, however alginate is more economical and easier to use, it is more suitable for preliminary impressions and situations where extreme precision is not essential.

References

Abrita, J. C. T., Fuller, J. B., Cucci, A. L. M., Giampaolo, E. T., & Leonardi, P. (1989). Alteração dimensional linear de moldes de hidrocolóide irreversível para prótese parcial removível. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 18, 265-272.

Anusavice, K. J. (2003). Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. (11th ed.). Saunders.

Carr, A. B., & Brown, D. T. (2011). McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. (12th ed.). Mosby.

Chiarello de Mattos, M. G., Tiossi, R., Lapria Faria, A. C., Silveira Rodrigues, R. C., & Ribeiro, R. F. (2006). Moldagem em prótese parcial removível: Modelos de estudo, de trabalho e funcional. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rodrigo-Tiossi/publication/237064166

Craig, R. G., Powers, J. M., & Wataha, J. C. (2000). Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. (8th ed.). Mosby.

Craig, R. G., & Powers, J. M. (2002). Materiais Dentários Restauradores. (12th ed.). Artmed.

Eckert, S. E., & Lammie, G. A. (1996). Accuracy of elastomeric impression materials with varied impression techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 9(2), 113-121.

Ewoldsen, N., & Sundh, A. (1991). The accuracy of impressions: A study of precision of impression materials and techniques in the clinical situation. Swedish Dental Journal. Supplement, 77, 1-39.

Garcia, P. P., Goiato, M. C., Dos Santos, D. M., Haddad, M. F., & Pesqueira, A. A. (2023). Evaluation of the accuracy of alginates and addition silicones for the production of partial removable dental prostheses. Materials Research Express, 10(3), 035401. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac6920

Hyde, T. P., Craddock, H. L., & Gray, J. C. (2011). Removable partial dentures: A practitioner's manual. Blackwell Publishing.

Johnson, G. H., & Craig, R. G. (2011). Accuracy of Four Types of Elastomeric Impression Materials Compared with Digital Scans. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.

Khasanov, R., & Mansurov, A. (2022). Comparative analysis of alginates and addition silicones in the manufacture of removable dentures. Stomatological Review, 1(15), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20221150112

McCabe, J. F., & Walls, A. W. G. (2008). Applied dental materials. (9th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Mattos, P. C. (2015). Tipos de revisão de literatura. Unesp, 1-9. https://www.fca.unesp.br/Home/Biblioteca/tipos-de-evisao-de-literatura.pdf

Nogueira, S. S., Antoniazzi, R. P., & Bortoluzzi, E. A. (2019). Silicone facial prostheses: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(6), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.005

Phoenix, R. D., Cagna, D. R., DeFreest, C. F., & Stewart, K. L. (2012). Stewart's clinical removable partial prosthodontics. (4th ed.). Quintessence Publishing.

Powers, J. M., & Sakaguchi, R. L. (2012). Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. (13th ed.). Mosby.

Preiskel, H. W. (2011). Precision attachment prostheses: Theory and practice. Quintessence Publishing.

Puri, A., Khanna, A., & Dixit, S. (2015). Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of impression materials used for indirect restorations: A review of literature. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9(6), ZE04-ZE09.

Rosenstiel, S. F., Land, M. F., & Fujimoto, J. (2006). Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. (4th ed.). Mosby.

Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta paul. enferm., 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001

Skinner, E. W., & Pomes, C. E. (1946). Dimensional stability of alginate impression materials. Journal of the American Dental Association, 33, 1253-1260.

Walker, M. P., & Petrie, C. S. (2005). Moisture Effect on Dimensional Accuracy and Detail Reproduction of Elastomeric Impressions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.

Winkler, S., & Imberman, M. (2002). Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics. Blackwell Munksgaard.

Downloads

Published

28/06/2024

How to Cite

SANTOS, P. G. S. T. dos .; SILVA, M. C. D. da .; FÉLIX, L. C. de L. .; NASCIMENTO, M. E. M. C. do .; SILVA , I. A. E. .; MARQUES FILHO, E. de Q. .; ATAÍDE FILHO, A. C. de . Alginate versus addition silicone: What is the best material for removable partial dentures?. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 7, p. e1513746223, 2024. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v13i7.46223. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/46223. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences