Noise reduction algorithm in hearing aids: influence on speech recognition in noisy environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8352Keywords:
Hearing aids; Hearing loss; Audiology; Audiometry; Speech; Speech discrimination tests.Abstract
Purpose: To verify the influence of the noise reduction algorithm on speech recognition of adults and elderly users of hearing aids. Method: Cross-sectional study conducted with 18 years or older individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, referred for hearing aids fitting. It was used the List of Sentences in Portuguese test in an acoustically treated cabin under two conditions: noise reduction algorithm on and off. Results: There was an improvement in the Signal-to-Noise ratio in the condition of noise reduction on compared to noise reduction off (p = 0.043). Regarding the Speech Recognition in Noise Index, no statistically significant differences were observed. Two variables were defined: ΔSNR and ΔSRNI. ΔSNR is the difference between the Signal-to-Noise ratio with noise reduction off and on, while ΔSRNI is the difference between Speech Recognition in Noise Index with noise reduction on and off. An increase in ΔSNR is related to a worsening of ΔSRNI. Conclusion: The Signal-to-Noise ratio improved with the use of the noise reduction. However, this was not verified for the SRNI. In addition, an inverse relationship between ΔSNR and ΔSRNI was observed, implying that an improvement in Signal-to-Noise ratio may compromise the speech recognition in noise.
References
Baraldi, G. S., Almeida, L. C., & Borges, A. C. C. (2007). Evolução da perda auditiva no decorrer do envelhecimento. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 73(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-72992007000100010
Bentler, R., Wu, Y. H., Kettel, J., & Hurtig, R. (2008). Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies. International Journal of Audiology, 47(8), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802033091
Bertozzo, M. C., & Blasca, W. Q. (2019). Análise comparativa dos métodos prescritivos NAL-NL2 e DSL v5.0a na adaptação do AASI em idosos. CoDAS, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018171
Brons, I., Houben, R., & Dreschler, W. A. (2014). Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners. Trends in Hearing, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514553924
Canzi, P., Manfrin, M., Locatelli, G., Nopp, P., Perotti, M., & Benazzo, M. (2016). Development of a novel Italian speech-in-noise test using a roving-level adaptive method: adult population-based normative data. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica : Organo Ufficiale Della Societa Italiana Di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, 36(6), 506–512. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-1133
Chung, K. (2004). Challenges and Recent Developments in Hearing Aids: Part I. Speech Understanding in Noise, Microphone Technologies and Noise Reduction Algorithms. Trends in Amplification, 8(3), 83–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380400800302
Cooper, J. C., & Cutts, B. P. (1971). Speech discrimination in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14(2), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1402.332
Costa, M. J. (1998). Listas de sentenças em português: apresentação & estratégias de aplicação na audiologia. Santa Maria: Pallotti.
Costa, M. J., Daniel, R. C., & Neujahr, S. dos S. (2011). Sentence recognition in quiet and in noise on earphones: reference benchmarks. In Revista CEFAC (Vol. 13).
da Silva, A. P. R. (2014). A seleção do AASI no deficiente auditivo idoso, comparando o desempenho entre a programação padrão e a programação individualizada. Universidade de São Paulo.
Davis, H., & Silverman, S. R. (1966). Hearing and Deafness. In Hearing and Deafness (3rd ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
de Oliveira, J. R. M., Lopes, E. S., & Alves, A. F. (2010). Speech perception of hearing impaired people using a hearing aid with noise supression algorithms. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000100003
Desjardins, J. L., & Doherty, K. A. (2014). The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear and Hearing, 35(6), 600–610.
https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028
Dworsack-Dodge, M. (2013). The Devil is in the Fitting Details. Retrieved August 12, 2020, from AudiologyOnline website: https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/devil-in-fitting-details-11566
Ferreira, G. C., Santos, S. N. dos, & Costa, M. J. (2017). Fatores de influência na percepção de fala em idosos usuários de próteses auditivas. Distúrbios Da Comunicação, 29(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2017v29i3p405-415
Guijo, L. M., Horiuti, M. B., & Cardoso, A. C. V. (2019). Mensuração do esforço auditivo com o uso de um paradigma de tarefa dupla do Português Brasileiro: estudo-piloto. CoDAS, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018181
Henriques, M. O., Miranda, E. C. de, & Costa, M. (2008). Limiares de reconhecimento de sentenças no ruído, em campo livre: valores de referência para adultos normo-ouvintes. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 74(2), 188–192.
Hilkhuysen, G., Gaubitch, N., Brookes, M., & Huckvale, M. (2012). Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: Dependency on signal-to-noise ratios. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3665996
Holube, I., Puder, H., & Velde, T. M. (2014). DSP Hearing aids. In M. J. METZ (Ed.), Sandlin’s Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations. (pp. 221–294).
Hopkins, K. (2015). Deafness in cochlear and auditory nerve disorders. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology (Vol. 129, pp. 479–494). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00027-5
Hu, Y., & Loizou, P. C. (2007). A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(3), 1777–1786. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2766778
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2013). Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - Pessoas com deficiência auditiva, total, percentual e coeficiente de variação, por sexo e situação do domicílio. Retrieved September 21, 2019, from https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/5719
Keidser, G., Dillon, H. R., Flax, M., Ching, T., & Brewer, S. (2011). The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Research, 1(1S). https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e24
Melo, R., Menezes, D., & Pacífico, F. (2017). Brazilian Portuguese Hearing in Noise Test (HINT): different interpretation criteria for individuals’ responses. CoDAS, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016082
Nordrum, S., Erler, S., Garstecki, D., & Dhar, S. (2006). Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms. American Journal of Audiology, 15(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2006/010)
Oliveira, J. R. M., Lopes, E. S., & Alves, A. F. (2010). Percepção de fala dos deficientes auditivos usando aparelho de amplificação com algoritmo de redução de ruído. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-86942010000100003
OMS - Organização Mundial de Saúde. (2018). World hearing day infographic. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/deafness/world-hearing-day/WorldHearing-Day-Infographic-EN.pdf?ua=1
Plomp, R. (1994). Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design. Ear and Hearing, 15(1), 2–12. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8194676
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(5), 1333–1342. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383554
Ricketts, T. A., & Hornsby, B. W. Y. (2005). Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing “digital noise reduction.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(5), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.5.2
Santos, S. N., & Costa, M. J. (2016). Percepção de fala no ruído em idosos usuários de próteses auditivas com diferentes microfones e algoritmo de redução de ruído. Audiology - Communication Research, 21(0). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2015-1607
Smaldino, J., Kreisman, B., & John, A. (2014). Sandlin’s textbook of hearing aid amplification. In M. Metz (Ed.), Sandlin’s textbook of hearing aid amplification (3rd ed, pp. 629–658). San Diego: Plurall.
Wu, Y.-H., Stangl, E., Chipara, O., Hasan, S. S., DeVries, S., & Oleson, J. (2019). Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing, 40(4), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000672
Yumba, W. (2019). Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users. Noise
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Sabrina Nuñes Gonçalves; Adriana Laybauer Silveira; Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.