Estimulación transcraneal de corriente continua para la enfermedad de Alzheimer: una revisión sistemática

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10459

Palabras clave:

Estimulación transcraneal de corriente continua; Envejecimiento; Enfermedad de Alzheimer; Cognición.

Resumen

El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar los efectos de la Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Continua (ETCC) sobre la cognición, la funcionalidad y los síntomas conductuales y psicológicos en personas con EA. Esta es una revisión sistemática, realizada sobre la base del Registro Cochrane Central de Ensayos Controlados (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs y Embase. El período de publicación del material utilizado en la presente revisión tuvo en cuenta los estudios publicados desde su inserción hasta septiembre de 2020. Como resultado, se encontraron 759 estudios, de los cuales 742 fueron retirados según los criterios de elegibilidad. Se eligieron 17 artículos para la lectura completa, de los cuales 8 fueron rechazados por no cumplir con los criterios de elegibilidad. Por lo tanto, se seleccionaron e incluyeron diez estudios para su análisis en esta revisión. La evidencia actual sugiere que ETCC es una terapia alternativa para pacientes com EA. Sin embargo, la recomendación de esta terapia debe realizarse con cautela, ya que los hallazgos encontrados en el presente estudio indican baja calidad de los estudios actuales, acompañados de datos que utilizan tamaños de muestra pequeños y problemas metodológicos, lo que sugiere que se necesitan más estudios para verificar eficacia clínica de ETCC en esta población.

Citas

Alexopoulos G. S., Abrams R. C., Young R. C., Shamoian C. A. (1988). Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Biol. Psychiatry, 23 (3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(88)90038-8.

Alzheimer Association (2016). Alzheimer disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 12(4), 459–509. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570871.

Batsikadze, G., Moliadze, V., Paulus, W., Kuo, M-F., & Nitsche, M. A. (2013). Partially non – linear stimulation intensity – dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans: Effect of tDCS on cortical excitability. The Journal of Physiology, 591(7), 1987 – 2000. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730.

Berryhill, M., Jones, K. T. (2012). tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neuroscience Letters, 521(2), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074.

Boggio, P. S., Khoury, L. P., Martins, D. C. S., Martins, O. E. M. S., Macedo, E.C ., Fregni, F. (2009). Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a Visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 80(4), 444-447. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.141853.

Boggio, P. S., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Martins, D., Martins, O., Vergari, M., Tadini, L; Elio, S; Priori, F. (2012). Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Stimulation, 5(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.006.

Brown, R. R., & Partington, J. E. (1942). The intelligence of the narcotic drug addict. Journal of General Psychology, 26, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1942.10544722.

Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., Edwards, D. J., Valero-Cabre, A., Rotenberg, A., Pascual-Leone, A., Ferrucci, R., Priori, A., Boggio, P. S., & Fregni F. (2012). Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (Tdcs): Challenges and future directions. Brain stimulation, 5(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002.

Bystad, M., Gronli, O., Rasmussen, I. D., Gundersen, N., Nordvang, L., Wang – Iversen, H., Aslaksen P. M (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation as a memory enhancer in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0180-3.

Cappon, D., Jahanshahi, M., & Bisiacchi, P. (2016). Value and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in the cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review since 2000. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00157.

Caro, S. O., Khalil, A. A., Sehm, B., Villringer, A., Nikulin, V. V., Nazarova, M. (2019). Predicting the Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke. Front. Neurol, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00302.

Cespón, J., Rodella, C., Miniussi, C., Pellicciari, M. C. (2019). Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy elderly and Alzheimer’s disease patients: A pilot study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 130(11), 2038-2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.016.

Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Brambilla, M., Petesi, M., Rosini, S., Ferrari, C., Miniussi, C. (2014). Anodal tDCS during face – name associations memory training in Alzheimer’s patients. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00038.

Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Paternico, D., Cosseddu, M., Brambilla, M., Petesi, M., Premi, E., Gasparotti, R., Zanetti, O., Padovani, A., Borroni, B. (2016). Grey Matter Density Predicts the Improvement of Naming Abilities After tDCS Intervention in Agrammatic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia. Brain Topogr, 29, 738-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0494-2.

Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg, T.S., Carusi, D.A., Gornbein, J. (1994). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44 (12), 2308-2314. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9674758.

Datta, A., Truong, D., Minhas, P., Parra, L., Bikson, M. (2012). Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models. Front Psychiatry, 3,91. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091.

Falco, A. D., Cukierman, D. S., Hauser-Davis, R. A., & Rey*, N. A. (2016). Doença de Alzheimer: Hipóteses etiológicas e perspectivas de tratamento. Química Nova, 39(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20150152.

Ferruci, R., Mameli, F., Guidi, I., Mrakic – Sposta, S., Vergari, M., Marceglia, S., Priori. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 71(7), 493 – 498. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3.

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, F.S., Mc Hugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State” a Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. Neurology, 12(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

Hampel, H., Prvulovic, D., Teipel, S., Jessen, F., Luckhaus, C., Frölich, L. German Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease (GTF-AD). (2011). The future of Alzheimer’s disease: The next 10 years. Progress in Neurobiology, 95(4), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.11.008.

Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A., Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry, 140, 566-572. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566.

Hsu, W.-Y., Ku, Y., Zanto, T. P., & Gazzaley, A. (2015). Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiology of Aging, 36(8), 2348–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.016.

Huynh, R. A., & Mohan C. (2017). Alzheimer’s disease: Biomarkers in the genome, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid. Frontiers in Neurology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00102.

Im, J. J., et al (2019). Effects of 6-month at-home transcranial direct current stimulation on cognition and cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Stimulation, 12(5), 1222-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.003.

Inagawa, T., Narita, Z., Sugawara, N., Maruo, K., Stickley, Yokoi, Y., Sumiyoshi, T. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Multisession Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognition in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 50 (4), 273 - 282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059418800889.

Jung, Y. J., Kim, J. H., Im, C. H. (2013). COMETS: A MATLAB Toolbox for Simulating Local Electric Fields Generated by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Biomed Eng Lett, 3, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-013-0087-x.

Khedr, E. M., El Gamal, N. F., El-Fetoh, N. A., Khalifa, H., Ahmed, E. M., Ali, A. M., Karim, A. A. (2014). A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00275.

Khedr, E. M., Salama, R. H., Hameed, M. A., Elfetoh, N. A., Seif, P. M. S. (2019). Therapeutic Role of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer Disease Patients: Double- Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33(5) 384 – 394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319840285.

Kim, J. H., Kim, D. W., Chang, W. H., Kim, Y H., Kim, K., Im, C. H. (2014). Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Neuroscience Letters, 564(3), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.054.

Koenigs, M., Barbey, A. K., Postle, B. R., Grafman, J. (2009). Superior Parietal Cortex Is Critical for the Manipulation of Information in Working Memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 29 (47), 14980-14986. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009.

Labruna, L., Inbar, A. S., Breska, A., Dabit, M., Vanderschelden, B., Nitsche, M. A., Ivry, R. B. (2019). Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Stimulation, 12(4), 992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.008.

Liu, C. S., Rau, A., Gallagher, D., Rajji, T. K., Lanctôt, K. L., & Herrmann, N. (2017). Using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 7(5), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2017-0021

Marin, R. S., Biedrzycki, R. C., Firinciogullari, S. (1991). Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Research, 38(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-v.

Miceli, G., Laudanna. A., Burani, C., Capasso, R. (1994). Batteria per l’analisi dei deficit afasici, BADA. Cepsag, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico Gemelli, Roma. Retrieved from: https://www.iris.unisa.it/handle/11386/3828878?mode=full.19#.X 8aXx1VKjIU

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.

Moreno-Duarte, I., Gebodh, N., Schestatsky, P., Guleyupoglu, B., Reato, D., Bikson, M., & Fregni, F. (2014). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation (tPCS), and Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS). The Stimulated Brain, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404704-4.00002-8.

Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc, 53, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

Nitrini, R., & Takada, L. T. (2003). Fisiopatologia da doença de Alzheimer, 143–150.

Opitz, A., Paulus, W., Will, S., Antunes, A., Thielscher, A. (2015). Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage, 109, 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.033.

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231.

Rentz, D. M., Amariglio, R. E., Becker, J.A., Frey, M., Olson, L. E., Frishe, K., Carmasin, J., Mayer, J. E., Johnson, K. A., Sperling, R.A. (2011). Face- name associative memory performance is related to amyloid burden in normal elderly. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2776-2783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.006.

Rey, A. (1958). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses univ. de France. Retrieved from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(vtj3fa45qm1ean45vvffcz55))/reference/referencespapers. aspx?referenceid=1656248

Rey, A., & Osterrieth, P. A. (1993). Translations of excerpts from Andre Rey"s Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy and P. A. Osterrieth"s The Complex Figure Copy Test... Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7(1), 4–21. Retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-39859-001.

Roncero, C., Service, E., Malus, M., Solomon, S., Thiel, A., Probst, S., Chertkow, H. (2017). Dementia patients have reduced anomia following picture naming traning and anodal tDCS stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 10(2), 491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.434.

Rosen, W. G., Mohs, R. C., & Davis, K. L. (1984). A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 141(11), 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356.

Rouleau. I., Salmon, D. P., Butters. N., Kennedy, K. C., McGuire, K. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease. Brain Cognition, 18, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90112-y.

Silveira, J. A. C., Taddei, J. A. A. C., Guerra, P. H., & Nobre, M. R. (2011). Effectiveness of school- based nutrition education interventions to prevent and reduce excessive weight gain in children and adolescents: a sistematic review. Jornal de Pediatria, 87(5), 382 – 392. https://doi.org/10.2223/JPED.2123.

Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standadndized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174.

Suemoto, C. K., Apolinario, D., Nakamura – Palacios, E.M., Lopes, Paraizo Leite, R. E., Sales, M.C., Nitrini, R., Brucki, S. M., Morillo, L. S., Magaldi, R.M., & Fregni F. (2014). Effects of a non-focal plasticity protocol on apathy in moderate alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham – controlled trial. Brain Stimulation, 7(2), 308 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.003.

Tinetti, M. E., Williams, T. F., Mayewski, R. (1986). Fall Risk Index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities. Am J Med, 80, 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(86)90717-5.

Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. (3rd). San Antonio, TX, USA: The Psychological Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.236

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Technical and interpretive manual. (4 Ed,) San Antonio, TX, USA: Psychological Corporation. Retrieved from: https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Cognition-%26-Neuro/Wechsler-Adult-Intelligence-Scale-%7C-Fourth-Edition/p/100000392.html

Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., Baddeley, A., & Hiorns, R. (1989). The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(6), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638908400940.

Woods, S. P., Delis, D. C., Scott, J. C., Kramer, J. H., Holdnack, J. A. (2006). The California Verbal Learning Test – Second Edition: test-retest reliability, practice effects, and reliable change indices for the standard and alternate forms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 21, 413–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.002.

Yang, H. D., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. B., Young, L. D., & Joanette, Y. (2016). History of Alzheimer’s Disease. Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders, 15(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2016.15.4.115

Yu, X., Li, Y., Wen, H., Zhang, Y., & Tian, X. (2015). Intensity-dependent effects of repetitive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on learning and memory in a rat model of Alzheimer´s disease. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 123, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.06.003.

Zhao, H., Qiao, L., Fan, D., Zhang, S., Turel, O., Li, Y., Li, J., Xue, G., Chen, A., & He, Q. (2017). Modulation of brain activity with noinvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (Tdcs): Clinical applications and safety concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00685.

Descargas

Publicado

28/12/2020

Cómo citar

NASCIMENTO, W. K. .; QUEIROZ, M. E. B. S.; COSTA, L. P. .; OLIVEIRA, E. A. de .; FERNÁNDEZ-CALVO, B. .; ANDRADE, S. M. . Estimulación transcraneal de corriente continua para la enfermedad de Alzheimer: una revisión sistemática. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 12, p. e43291210459, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10459. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10459. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2024.

Número

Vol. 9 Núm. 12

Sección

Ciencias de la salud

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2020 Wanessa Kallyne Nascimento; Maria Eduarda Bezerra Sales Queiroz; Larissa Pereira Costa; Eliane Araújo de Oliveira; Bernadino Fernández-Calvo; Suellen Marinho Andrade

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:

1) Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite el compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.

2) Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.

3) Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la cita del trabajo publicado.