Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos relacionados com el Refuerzo No Contingente em el tratamiento de personas com discapacidades del neurodesarrollo

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12613

Palabras clave:

Refuerzo no contingente; NCR; Reducción de conductas problemáticas; Manipulación de antecedentes.

Resumen

El refuerzo no contingente, o NCR, es un procedimiento del Análisis de Conducta Aplicado. Este procedimiento se basa en la entrega al individuo de sus objectos preferidos o en la posibilidad de realizar sus actividades preferidas cada cierto tiempo, con independencia de sus respuestas. Aunque se utiliza con frecuencia para reducir con éxito los comportamientos disruptivos o problematicos, no existe consenso sobre los procesos involucrados y las causas de los cambios de comportamiento observados. Este artículo teórico-conceptual discute cada uno de los procesos involucrados en el NCR, que han sido dilucidados en los primeros estudios empíricos sobre el tema publicados en el Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) en la década de 1990. Este artículo también tiene en cuenta las contribuciones de estudios publicados en JABA en la última década para aclarar los mecanismos por los cuales el NCR suprime las respuestas. Se concluye que los efectos del NCR derivan de una combinación de factores que deben ser considerados en la construcción del “paquete” de intervención diseñado para cada individuo.

Citas

Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111

Carr, E. G., & Severtson, J. M. (2005). On the appropriateness of the term “noncontingent reinforcement”. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 6, 21-24.

Carr, J. E., Severtson, J. M., & Lepper, T. L. (2009). Noncontingent reinforcement as an empirically supported treatment for problem

Behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 4-57.

1016/j.ridd.2008.03.002.

Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Catania, A. C. (2005). The nonmaintenance of behavior by noncontingent reinforcement. European Journal of Behavior Analysis 89(6):89-94. 10.1080/15021149.2005.11434253

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2019). Applied Behavior Analysis (3a ed). Pearson Education

Fisher, S. M., Iwata, B.A., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1997). Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as a treatment for self-injurious

Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 239-249.

Fritz, J. N., Jackson, L. M., Stiefler, N. A., Wimberly, B. S., & Richardson, A. R. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 50(3), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.395

Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., & Legacy, S. M. (1994). Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 317-325.

Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997). Non-contingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229-237.

Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis & Intervention

Developmental Disabilities, 2(1), 3–20

Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. 10.1901/jaba.1994.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2017). Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. (7a ed.). Atlas.

Lalli, J. S., Casey, S. D., & Kates, K. (1997). Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: Some procedural variations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 127-137.

Marcus, B. A., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). Combining non-contingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 43-51.

McSweeney, F. K., & Norman, W. D. (1979). Defining behavioral contrast for multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32(3), 457–461. 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-457.

Nevin JA, Mandell C, Atak JR. The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1983; 39:49–59. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49 [PubMed: 16812312]

Nevin J.A., & Grace R.C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavior Brain Science 23(1):73-90. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405.

PMID: 11303339.

Pereira, A. S., Sitsuka, D. M., Pereira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. Santa Maria, RS: UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Phillips, C. L., Iannaccone, J. A., Rooker, G. W., & Hagopian, L. P. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 357-376. 10.1002/jaba.376.

Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Hanley, G. P., LeBlanc, L. A., Worsdell, A. S., Lindauer, S. E., & Keeney, K. M. (1998). Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 165–189.

Poling A., & Normand M. P. (1999). Noncontingent Reinforcement: An Inappropriate Description of Time-Based Schedules That Reduce Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 237-238.

Reed, D. D., & Kaplan, B. A. (2011). The matching law: A tutorial for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(2), 15–24. 10.1007/BF03391780.

Richman, D. M., Barnard-Brak, L., Grubb, L., Bosch, A., & Abby, L. (2015). Metaanalysis of noncontingent reinforcement effects on problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 131-152. 10.1002/jaba.189.

Saini, V., Fisher, W. W., & Pisman, M. D. (2017). Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 50(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.380

Slocum, S. K., Grauerholz-Fisher, E., Peters, K. P., & Vollmer, T. R. (2018). A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 51(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.427

Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 16–23. 10.1007/BF03391716.

Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9-21.

Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Ringdahal, J. E. (1995). Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 15-26.

Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., Roane, H. S., & Marcus, B. A. (1997). Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 161-164.

Vollmer, T. (1999). Noncontingent Reinforcement: Some Additional Comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(2), 239–240.

Publicado

17/02/2021

Cómo citar

NOGUEIRA, C. B. .; LOBATO, A. F. F. .; LEÃO , E. A. S. .; BARROS , R. da S. Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos relacionados com el Refuerzo No Contingente em el tratamiento de personas com discapacidades del neurodesarrollo . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. e33110212613, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12613. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12613. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2024.

Número

Sección

Ciencias de la educación