Questões conceituais e metodológicas quanto ao Reforçamento Não Contingente na intervenção de pessoas com desenvolvimento atípico

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12613

Palavras-chave:

NCR; Reforçamento não contingente ; Redução de comportamentos problema; Manipulação de antecedentes.

Resumo

O reforçamento não contingente (non-contingent reinforcement - NCR) é um procedimento da Análise do Comportamento Aplicada baseado na apresentação de itens ou disponibilização de atividades preferidas de acordo com intervalos de tempo pré-estabelecidos e de forma independente da emissão de respostas-alvo. Apesar de frequentemente ser utilizado com sucesso na redução de comportamentos disruptivos ou problemáticos, não há consenso sobre quais os processos envolvidos e responsáveis pelas mudanças comportamentais observadas. Este artigo teórico-conceitual discute cada um dos possíveis processos relacionados ao NCR e elucidados nos primeiros estudos empíricos sobre o assunto publicados no Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) na década de noventa; também considera as contribuições de meta-análises publicadas no JABA na última década e estudos feitos nos últimos três anos para esclarecer os mecanismos pelos quais o NCR suprime respostas. Conclui-se que os efeitos do NCR derivam de uma combinação de fatores que devem ser considerados na construção do “pacote” de intervenção desenhado para cada indivíduo.

Referências

Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111

Carr, E. G., & Severtson, J. M. (2005). On the appropriateness of the term “noncontingent reinforcement”. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 6, 21-24.

Carr, J. E., Severtson, J. M., & Lepper, T. L. (2009). Noncontingent reinforcement as an empirically supported treatment for problem

Behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 4-57.

1016/j.ridd.2008.03.002.

Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Catania, A. C. (2005). The nonmaintenance of behavior by noncontingent reinforcement. European Journal of Behavior Analysis 89(6):89-94. 10.1080/15021149.2005.11434253

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2019). Applied Behavior Analysis (3a ed). Pearson Education

Fisher, S. M., Iwata, B.A., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1997). Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as a treatment for self-injurious

Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 239-249.

Fritz, J. N., Jackson, L. M., Stiefler, N. A., Wimberly, B. S., & Richardson, A. R. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 50(3), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.395

Hagopian, L. P., Fisher, W. W., & Legacy, S. M. (1994). Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 317-325.

Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997). Non-contingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229-237.

Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis & Intervention

Developmental Disabilities, 2(1), 3–20

Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. 10.1901/jaba.1994.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. A. (2017). Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. (7a ed.). Atlas.

Lalli, J. S., Casey, S. D., & Kates, K. (1997). Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: Some procedural variations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 127-137.

Marcus, B. A., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). Combining non-contingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 43-51.

McSweeney, F. K., & Norman, W. D. (1979). Defining behavioral contrast for multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32(3), 457–461. 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-457.

Nevin JA, Mandell C, Atak JR. The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1983; 39:49–59. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49 [PubMed: 16812312]

Nevin J.A., & Grace R.C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavior Brain Science 23(1):73-90. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405.

PMID: 11303339.

Pereira, A. S., Sitsuka, D. M., Pereira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. Santa Maria, RS: UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Phillips, C. L., Iannaccone, J. A., Rooker, G. W., & Hagopian, L. P. (2017). Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 357-376. 10.1002/jaba.376.

Piazza, C. C., Fisher, W. W., Hanley, G. P., LeBlanc, L. A., Worsdell, A. S., Lindauer, S. E., & Keeney, K. M. (1998). Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 165–189.

Poling A., & Normand M. P. (1999). Noncontingent Reinforcement: An Inappropriate Description of Time-Based Schedules That Reduce Behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 237-238.

Reed, D. D., & Kaplan, B. A. (2011). The matching law: A tutorial for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4(2), 15–24. 10.1007/BF03391780.

Richman, D. M., Barnard-Brak, L., Grubb, L., Bosch, A., & Abby, L. (2015). Metaanalysis of noncontingent reinforcement effects on problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 131-152. 10.1002/jaba.189.

Saini, V., Fisher, W. W., & Pisman, M. D. (2017). Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 50(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.380

Slocum, S. K., Grauerholz-Fisher, E., Peters, K. P., & Vollmer, T. R. (2018). A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 51(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.427

Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: A review and practical guide. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 16–23. 10.1007/BF03391716.

Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention maintained self-injurious behavior: Noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9-21.

Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Ringdahal, J. E. (1995). Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 15-26.

Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., Roane, H. S., & Marcus, B. A. (1997). Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 161-164.

Vollmer, T. (1999). Noncontingent Reinforcement: Some Additional Comments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(2), 239–240.

Downloads

Publicado

17/02/2021

Como Citar

NOGUEIRA, C. B. .; LOBATO, A. F. F. .; LEÃO , E. A. S. .; BARROS , R. da S. Questões conceituais e metodológicas quanto ao Reforçamento Não Contingente na intervenção de pessoas com desenvolvimento atípico. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. e33110212613, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12613. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12613. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Ciências Educacionais