Barreras para la expansión del teletrabajo en la pandemia del COVID-19

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16764

Palabras clave:

Teletrabajo; Trabajando en casa; Trabajo remoto; Sistema sociotécnico; COVID-19.

Resumen

La pandemia del COVID-19, la crisis del petróleo de 1973 y 1979 y el desempleo en Europa en la década de 1980 tienen en común la ruptura de paradigmas y cambios de comportamiento que requerían transformaciones en las relaciones laborales. El avance de la tecnología permitió la aplicación del teletrabajo como alternativa para reducir la congestión y la contaminación. Se percibieron ventajas en mejorar la calidad de vida y reducir costos, pero se requirieron cambios de comportamiento, por lo que el aislamiento, el trabajo autónomo y el sentido de responsabilidad exigieron nuevas habilidades en su aplicación. Se realizó una survey para comparar el resultado con el sistema socio-técnico en una empresa de ingeniería. Hubo consenso para reducirlo entre uno o dos días a la semana, además de delegar más responsabilidad a los empleados, se aceptó un aumento en la carga de trabajo para compensar la libertad de elección.

Biografía del autor/a

Rodrigo Rodrigues de Freitas, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Centro Federal de Educación Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ

Universidad Federal del Rio de Janeiro PET/COPPE/UFRJ

Thiago Ribeiro Sagawe, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca

Centro Federal de Educación Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ

Aryane Cristine Dantas de Moura, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca

Centro Federal de Educación Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ

Fabrício Gomes Ribeiro, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca

Centro Federal de Educación Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ

Felipe do Carmo Amorim, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca

Centro Federal de Educaión Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFET/RJ

Citas

Adamides. E. D. (2019). Activity‐based analysis of sociotechnical change. Syst Res Behav Sci. 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sres.2616.

Araujo, I. C., Luquini, I. M. A. M., Castro, M. C. D., Maia, P. L. O., & Esteves, D. P. (2021). Teleworking: considerations and implications of employment relationships for workers’ health. Research, Society and Development 10, n. 1, p. e50010111995. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11995.

Baruch, Y., & Yuen, Y. K. J. (2000). Inclination to opt for teleworking: A comparative analysis of United Kingdom versus Hong Kong employees. International Journal of Manpower 21(7), 521-539. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/01437720010378980.

Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis. Sustainability 12(9), 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/

su12093662.

Calderwood, E., & Freathy, P. (2014). Consumer mobility in the Scottish isles: The impact of internet adoption upon retail travel patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 59, 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.012.

Caulfield, B. (2015). Does it pay to work from home? Examining the factors influencing working from home in the Greater Dublin Area. Case Studies on Transport Policy 3, 206-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cstp.2015.04.004.

Emery, F. E., & Trist, E.L., (1965). The causal textures of organizational environments. Human Relations 18, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/

Freitas, R. R., Sagawe, T. R., Moura, A. C. D., Ribeiro, F., & Amorim, F. C. (2020). COVID-19 e o Teletrabalho: pesquisa de percepção de antes e durante a pandemia na região metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro. CEFET-RJ Campus Itaguaí. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3941215.

Garcia, R. M. (1980). Abordagem Sócio-técnica: Uma rápida avaliação. Rev. Adm. Emp. 20 (3), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901980000300006.

Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio‐technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi‐level perspective. Research Policy 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022.

Geels, F. W. (2018). Disruption and low‐carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio‐technical transitions research and the multi‐level perspective. Energy Research & Social Science 37, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. erss.2017.10.010.

Giovanis, E. (2017). The relationship between teleworking, traffic and air pollution. Atmospheric Pollution Research. http://dx.doi.org/

1016/j.apr.2017.06.004.

Henderson, D., & Mokhtarian, P. (1996). Impacts of center-based telecommuting on travel and emissions: analysis of the puget sound demonstration project. Transp. Res. D 1 (1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1361-9209(96)00009-0.

IETS – Instituto de Estudos do Trabalho e Sociedade (2013). Mobilidade urbana e mercado de trabalho na região metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro: Estudo estratégico 06.

Karia, N; Zainuddin, Y., & Asaari, M. H. (2003). Perception of Human Resources Managers on Telecommuting Concept Implementation in Malaysian Firms. Gajah Mada International Journal of Business 5 (1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5395.

Latour, B. (2001). A esperança de pandora: ensaios sobre a realidade dos estudos científicos. EDUSC.

Lister, K., & Harnish, T. (2019). Telework and its effects in the United States. Chapters, in: Jon C. Messenger (ed.), Telework in the 21st Century, chapter 3, pages 128-170, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mesquita, R. A., Sakahara, R., Nakano, D. N., & Santos, C. (2006). Análise da implantação da organização do trabalho em grupos em empresa do setor químico tendo como referência o modelo sociotécnico. In: XXVI ENEGEP. Brasil.

Mokhtarian, P., & Salomon, I. (1997). Modeling the desire to telecommute: the importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models. Transp. Res. A 31 (1).35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00010-9.

Moors, E; Rip, A., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2004). The Dinamics of Innovation: A Multilevel Coevolucionary Pespective. In: Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture. Wageningen: Royal Van Gorcum, 31-56.

Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 0143-7720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172.

Okano, M. T.; Santos, H. de C. L. dos; Honorato, W. J.; Viana, A. M.; & Ursini, E. L. (2020). Impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on large companies: evaluation of changes in technology infrastructure for telework under the optics of theories of dynamic capacity and adaptive structure. Research, Society and Development 9, n. 9, p. e756997852. https://doi.org/ 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7852.

O'Keefe, P., Caulfield, B., Brazil, W., & White, P. (2016). The impacts of telecommuting in Dublin, Research in Transportation Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.06.010.

Salerno, M.S. (2004). Da rotinização à flexibilização: ensaio sobre o pensamento crítico brasileiro de organização do trabalho. Revista Gestão e Produção 11 (1), 21-32.

Saludin, N.A., Karia, N., & Hassan, H. (2020). Working from Home (WFH): Is Malaysia Ready for Digital Society?. Entrepreneurship Vision 2020: Innovation, Development Sustainability, and Economic Growth.

Silva-Send, N., Anders, S., & Narwold, A. (2013). Cost effectiveness comparison of certain transportation measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in San Diego County, California. Energy Policy 62, 1428–1433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.059.

Stiles, J. (2020). Strategic niche management in transition pathways: Telework advocacy as groundwork for an incremental transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.001.

Terra, L. A. A., & Passador, J. L. (2018). The nature of social organization of production: From firms to complex dynamics. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2567.

Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical system. Toronto, Ontario: Ministry of Labor/Ontario Quality of Working Life Center. Issues in the quality of working life: a serie of occasional papers, n2.

Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal‐getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations 4 (1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101.

Vakilian. R., & Edrisi. A. (2020). Modeling Factors Affecting the Choice of Telework and Its Impact on Demand in Transportation Networks. Civil and Environmental Engineering. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/cee-2020-0003.

Publicado

26/06/2021

Cómo citar

FREITAS, R. R. de; SAGAWE, T. R.; MOURA, A. C. D. de; RIBEIRO, F. G. .; AMORIM, F. do C. Barreras para la expansión del teletrabajo en la pandemia del COVID-19. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 7, p. e39110716764, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16764. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16764. Acesso em: 2 dic. 2024.

Número

Sección

Ciencias Humanas y Sociales