Robotics and inclusion of students with disabilities in special education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18238Keywords:
Robotics; Special education; Inclusion; Disabilities; Educational robotics.Abstract
The concept of inclusion and inclusive education for children and adolescents with disabilities has been a topic of research for many countries over the last decades. Among the different methods and practices that have been implemented for interventions, the use of novel technologies and especially educational robotics has been proven to be a valuable tool. In this study, the authors attempted to define and examine those skills that are acquired through robotic interventions, and also the way they are associated with successful inclusion. The areas of social, cognitive, and functional skills of children and adolescents with disabilities were examined and their enhancement through robotics was assessed. For the purposes of this review, the authors searched Research Gate, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct and identified relevant research papers. After the application of eligibility criteria, 12 research papers were considered suitable for analysis. The analysis of results indicates that most children and adolescents with disabilities that participated in interventions with robots managed to develop their social, cognitive, and functional skills and in some cases, their inclusion in educational settings was facilitated. The findings of this review support the need for implementation of these newly introduced practices and also some implications are discussed.
References
Albo-Canals, J., Martelo, A. B., Relkin, E., Hannon, D., Heerink, M., Heinemann, M., Leidl, K., & Bers, M. U. (2018). A Pilot Study of the KIBO Robot in Children with Severe ASD. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0479-2
Alston, R. J., & Hampton, J. L. (2000). Science and engineering as viable career choices for students with disabilities: A survey of parents and teachers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 158-164.
*Bargagna, S., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dario, P., Dell’Omo, M., Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Martinelli, A., Pecini, C., & Sgandurra, G. (2019). Educational Robotics in Down Syndrome: A Feasibility Study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z
Barrow, L., Markman, L., & Rouse, C. E. (2009). Technology's edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 52-74.
* Bonarini, A., Clasadonte, F., Garzotto, F., Gelsomini, M., & Romero, M. (2016, December). Playful interaction with Teo, a mobile robot for children with neurodevelopmental disorders. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (pp. 223-231).
* Culén, A. L., Børsting, J., & Odom, W. (2019, June). Mediating relatedness for adolescents with ME: Reducing isolation through minimal interactions with a Robot Avatar. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 359-371).
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
*Disseler, S., & Mirand, G. (2017). Students with Disabilities and LEGO© Education. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(3), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n3a5
*Encarnação, P., Leite, T., Nunes, C., Nunes da Ponte, M., Adams, K., Cook, A., Caiado, A., Pereira, J., Piedade, G., & Ribeiro, M. (2017). Using assistive robots to promote inclusive education. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(4), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2016.1167970
Francisco, M. P. B., Hartman, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Inclusion and Special Education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 238.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn and Bacon.
Jung, S. E., Lee, K., Cherniak, S., & Cho, E. (2020). Non-sequential Learning in a Robotics Class: Insights from the Engagement of a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9394-8
Khaksar, S. M. S., Slade, B., Wallace, J., & Gurinder, K. (2020). Critical success factors for application of social robots in special developmental schools: Development, adoption and implementation. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2019-0304
Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 118–121.
Lee, H., & Hyun, E. (2015). The intelligent robot contents for children with speech-language disorder. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 100–113.
Leroux, P. (1999). Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 1080-1089.
Lindsay, S. (2020). Exploring Skills Gained Through a Robotics Program for Youth With Disabilities. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 40(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449219868276
Lindsay, S., & Hounsell, K. G. (2017). Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities: a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(7), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1229047
Pihlainen, K., Suero Montero, C., & Kärnä, E. (2017). Fostering parental co-development of technology for children with special needs informal learning activities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.010
Rodriguez, C. C., & Garro-Gil, N. (2015). Inclusion and integration on special education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1323-1327.
Shamsuddin, S., Yussof, H., Hanapiah, F. A., Mohamed, S., Jamil, N. F. F., & Yunus, F. W. (2015, August). Robot-assisted learning for communication-care in autism intervention. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (pp. 822-827).
Van Den Heuvel, R. J. F., Lexis, M. A. S., & De Witte, L. P. (2017a). Can the IROMEC robot support play in children with severe physical disabilities? A pilot study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 40(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000200
Van Den Heuvel, R. J. F., Lexis, M. A. S., & De Witte, L. P. (2017b). Robot ZORA in rehabilitation and special education for children with severe physical disabilities: A pilot study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 40(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000248
Van den Heuvel, R. J. F., Lexis, M. A. S., & de Witte, L. P. (2020). ZORA Robot Based Interventions to Achieve Therapeutic and Educational Goals in Children with Severe Physical Disabilities. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00578-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Christine Syriopoulou-Delli; Eleni Gkiolnta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
