Integrated Blended Research Strategy for online teaching-learning design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i7.30457Keywords:
Research method; Design Research; Mixed Method; Strategy; Development research.Abstract
The design of a research design leads to the formulation of doubts about which methodologies can be used, especially when it comes to educational design research. The aim of the study was to present a research strategy, with a combination of qualitative research methods. To achieve the objective, development research was carried out. The Integrated Mixed Research Strategy was developed, which was tested in an online teaching-learning design theorizing study. The strategy was structured in five modules: identification of the problem and the objective of the study, survey of theoretical reference, qualitative field study through qualitative metasynthesis, association of content analysis technique and use of instructional design elaboration methodology. The developed strategy proved to be versatile, innovative and with the potential to be replicated, bringing even more security and confidence in data analysis.
References
Alencar, E. S., & Almouloud, S. A. (2017). A Metodologia de Pesquisa: Metassíntese Qualitativa. Revista Reflexão e Ação, 25 (3), 204-220. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.17058/rea.v25i3.9731.
Amado, J., Costa, A. P. & Crusoé, N. (2013). A técnica de Análise de Conteúdo. In: Amado, João. (Coord). Manual de Investigação Qualitativa em Educação. 2ª ed., Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41 (1):16-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813.
Barbosa, J. C. & Oliveira, A. M. P. (2015). Por que a Pesquisa de Desenvolvimento na Educação Matemática? Perspectivas da Educação Matemática, 8, Número Temático: 526-546.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de Conteúdo. Tradução: Luis Antero Reto, São Paulo: Edições.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2): 141-178.
Brown, T. & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12 (1): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29.
Brown, T. (2019). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Burd, L. (1999). Desenvolvimento de software para atividades educacionais. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica e de Computação, Campinas, São Paulo.
Castro, F. G., Kellison, J., Boyd, S. & Kopak, A. (2010). A Methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4 (4): 342–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916.
Cavalcanti, C. C. & Filatro, A. (2017). Design Thinking: na educação presencial, a distância e corporativa. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V, P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2a ed., Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. 3a ed., Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3a ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dal-Farra, R. A. & Lopes, P. T. C. (2013). Métodos mistos de pesquisa em educação: Pressupostos teóricos. Nuances: Estudos sobre Educação, 24 (3): 67-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14572/nuances.v24i3.2698.
Dantas, K. O., Neves, R. F., Ribeiro, K. S. Q. S., Brito, G. E. G., Batista, M. C. (2019). Repercussões do nascimento e do cuidado de crianças com deficiência múltipla na família: uma metassíntese qualitativa. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 35 (6): e00157918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00157918.
Edelson, D. (2002). Design research: what we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1):105-121.
Farias, M. S. F. & Mendonça, A. P. (2021). Design Thinking como percurso Metodológico para Construção de Produto Educacional: uma experiência no Mestrado Profissional na Área de Ensino. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Ensino Tecnológico, 7: e103621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31417/educitec.v7.1036.
Ferrari, A. T. (1982), Metodologia da pesquisa científica. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill.
Flick, U. (2007). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre, Bookman.
Gagne, J. & Walters, K. (2009). Online Teaching Experience: A Qualitative Metasynthesis (QMS). Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5 (4): 577-589.
Geraldi, L. M. A. & Bizelli, J. L. (2017). Tecnologias da informação e comunicação na educação: conceitos e definições. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, 1 (18): 115-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v0i18.9379.
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4a ed, São Paulo: Atlas.
Gil, A. C. (2018). Didática do ensino superior. São Paulo, Atlas.
Gonsalves, E. P. (2003). Iniciação à pesquisa científica. 3a ed., Campinas – São Paulo: Alínea.
Grots, A. & Creuznacher, I. (2016). Design Thinking: Process or Culture? In: Brenner, Walter & Uebernickel, Falk (editors). Design Thinking for Innovation, St. Gallen, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3.
Matheus, M. C. C. (2009). Metassíntese qualitativa: desenvolvimento e contribuições para a prática baseada em evidências. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 22 (spe 1): 543-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002009000800019.
Mckenney, S. & Reeves, T. (2020). Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical Education, 55: 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14280.
Menezes, A. H. N., Duarte, F. R., Carvalho, L. O. R. & Souza, T. E. S. (2019). Metodologia Científica Teoria e Aplicação na Educação a Distância. Petrolina-Pe, Fundação Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2010). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. 29a ed., Petrópolis: Vozes.
Monteiro, R., R., M., Pacheco, M., A., L., Magalhães Junior, A., G. & Silva Neta, M., L. (2020). Docência universitária: percursos formativos de professores bacharéis que atuam em cursos de licenciatura. Research, Society and Development, 9 (7): e381974328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4328.
Noblit, G. & Hare, R. D. (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1: 281–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022.
Paranhos, R., Figueiredo Filho, D. B., Rocha, E. C. R., Silva Júnior, J. A. & Freitas, D. (2016). Uma introdução aos métodos mistos. Sociologias, 18 (42): 384-411. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/15174522-018004221.
Paterson, B. L. & Thorne, S. (2003). The Potential of Meta-synthesis for Nursing Care Effectiveness Research. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35 (3): 39–43.
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B. & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: an educational model towards creative confidence. Short Presentation in DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity, Kobe, Japan, 29 de novembro a 01de dezembro. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/30267/Design+Thinking%3A+An+Educational+Model+towards+Creative+Confidence.
Richey, R., Klein, J. & Nelson, W. (2003). Development research: Studies of instructional design and development. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2a ed., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rittel, H. W. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2): 155–169.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method Studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23 (3): 246–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X.
Santana, E., C. & Silveira, I., F. (2019). Um estudo de caso sobre o design de recursos educacionais abertos multiculturais. Research, Society and Development, 2019; 8(9): e32891301. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i9.1301.
Seels, B. & Richey, R. (1994), Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. AECT, Washington DC.
Silva, E. A. (2001). Evolução Histórica do Método Científico Desafios e Paradigmas para o Século XXI. Revista Economia & Pesquisa, 3 (3): 109-118.
Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in rapidly growing literature. Annual Review Sociology, 37:57–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657.
Tartuce, T. J. A. (2006). Métodos de pesquisa. Fortaleza: UNICE – Ensino Superior.
Van den Akker, J. N. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In: Van den Akker, J. N., Branch, R. M., Nieveen, G. K., Nieveen, N., Plomp, T. (eds). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vasconcelos, C. B., Simões-Borgiani, D., S. & Rosimeri, F., P. (2022). Design para a multiplicidade: uma proposta de integração de diferentes áreas com contribuições mútuas. Research, Society And Development, 11 (1): E44111125253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25253.
Vianna, M. (2012). Design thinking: inovação em negócios. Rio de Janeiro, Editora MJV.
Vosgerau, D. S. R. & Romanowski, J. P. (2014). Estudos de revisão: implicações conceituais e metodológicas. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 14 (41): 165-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/dialogo.educ.14.041.DS08.
Yin, R. (2006). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Tradução de Daniel Grassi, 3 ed., Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rozangela Maria de Almeida Fernandes Wyszomirska; Raffael Gonçalves Mota; Kerle Dayana Tavares Lucena; Almira Alves dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
