Comparison of the efficiency of two rotary systems in shaping simulated canals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i14.36736Keywords:
Root canal; Endodontics; Root canal treatment.Abstract
Objective: To compare the shaping of canals simulated by two rotary instruments: ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and X-Gray after second use. Materials and methods: Sixteen blocks of simulated channels were divided into two groups: PTN (ProTaper Next) and XG (X-Gray). Indian ink was injected into the simulated channels. These were covered with laminated paper so that there is no influence on the instrumentation. Prior to instrumentation of the root canals, patency was performed with a #10 K-file. The shaping of the canals was performed with an endodontic motor (Endopen-Schuster). Pre- and postoperatively, photographic images were analyzed for later superimposition and analysis in image software in Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 (Adobe Systema, San José, USA). Results: The Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed, whose purpose is to verify whether the data present a distribution similar to normal (p > 0.05) or not (p < 0.05). In this case, it is verified whether these variables are normally distributed. Conclusion: It was concluded that both rotary systems proved to be efficient in the modeling of the canals, being able to be used in curved canals.
References
Bonaccorso, A., Cantatore, G., Condorelli, G. G., Schäfer, E., & Tripi, T. R. (2009). Shaping Ability of Four Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Simulated S-Shaped Canals. Journal of Endodontics, 35(6), 883–886.
De Menezes, S. E. A. C., Batista, S. M., Lira, J. O. P., & de Melo Monteiro, G. Q. (2017). Cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, ProDesign R and ProDesign Logic files in curved canals in vitro. Iranian endodontic journal, 12(4), 468.
De oliveira, K. V., Dziadzio, Í. A., Cunico, L. H., Fariniuk, L. F., Tomazinho, F. S. F., Gabardo, M. C. L., & Baratto Filho, F. (2021). Análise da resistência à fadiga cíclica dos sistemas rotatórios ProTaper Next, X File e X Gray. RSBO, 18(1), 31-06.
Dummer, P. M. H., Alodeh, M. H. A., & Al‐Omari, M. A. O. (1991). A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. International endodontic journal, 24(2), 63-66.
Gagliardi, J., Versiani, M. A., de Sousa-Neto, M. D., Plazas-Garzon, A., & Basrani, B. (2015). Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold,
ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. Journal of endodontics, 41(10), 1718-1724.
Hülsmann, M., Gressmann, G., & Schäfers, F. (2003). A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments. International endodontic journal, 36(5), 358-366.
Lim, Y. J., Park, S. J., Kim, H. C., & Min, K. S. (2013). Comparison of the centering ability of Wave· One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 21-25.
Limoeiro, A. G., Dos Santos, A. H. B., De Martin, A. S., Kato, A. S., Fontana, C. E., Gavini, G., & da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2016). Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of 2 nickel-titanium instrument systems in shaping root canals. Journal of endodontics, 42(3), 496-499.
Machado, M. E. de L., Nabeshima, C. K., Leonardo, M. F. de P., & Cardenas, J. E. V. (2012). Análise do tempo de trabalho da instrumentação recíproca com limaúnica: WaveOne e Reciproc. Revista Da Associacao Paulista de Cirurgioes Dentistas, 66(2), 120–125.
Maniglia-Ferreira, C., de Almeida Gomes, F., Ximenes, T., Neto, M. A. T., Arruda, T. E., Ribamar, G. G., & Herculano, L. F. G. (2017). Influence of reuse and cervical preflaring on the fracture strength of reciprocating instruments. European journal of dentistry, 11(01), 041-047.
Ozsu, D., Karatas, E., Arslan, H., & Topcu, M. C. (2014). Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems. European Journal of Dentistry, 8(4), 504–508.
Pereira, H. S. C., Silva, E. J. N. L., & Coutinho Filho, T. S. (2012). Movimento reciprocante em Endodontia: Revisão de literatura. Revista Brasileira de
Odontologia, 69(2).
Piazza, G. C., do Amaral Capello, P., Almeida, C. N., Blatt, J. A., & Ferreira, R. (2021). Avaliação do número de canais modelados com limas ProDesign M até sua fratura, simulados em blocos de resina acrílica. Orbis Science, 1(1), 46-56.
Silva, M. R., de Carvalho, A. D. M., Rodrigues, M. A., Souza, C. C., Rosas, C. A. P., Cardoso, R. M., & da Silva Limoeiro, A. G. (2021). Estudo in vitro da limpeza de canais simulados (Wave One Gold X W-file). Research, Society and Development, 10(13), e541101321693-e541101321693.
Souza, G. L. de, Rodrigues, M. A., Carvalho, A. de M. de, Bezerra, E. S. de O. J. e, Matos, M. F., & Limoeiro, A. G. da S. (2022). Avaliação das características de modelagem dos sistemas ProTaper Next e X-Gray em canais simulados com dupla curvatura. Research, Society and Development, 11(8), e10811830662–e10811830662.
Van Der Vyver, P. J., Paleker, F., Vorster, M., & Francois, A. (2019). Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: A micro–computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and WaveOne gold instruments in maxillary first molars. Journal of endodontics, 45(1), 62-67.
Vilas-Boas, R. C., Alcalde, M. P., Guimarães, B. M., Ordinola-Zapata, R., Bueno, C. A. E., & Duarte, M. A. H. (2013). Reciproc: comparativo entre a cinemática reciprocante e rotatória em canais curvos. Revista Odontológica Do Brasil Central, 22(63).
Yin, X, Cheung, G. S., Zhang, C., Masuda, Y. M., Kimura, Y., & Matsumoto, K. Micro-computed tomographic comparison of nickel-titanium rotary versus traditional instruments in C-shaped root canal system. J Endod 2010; 36(4): 708-12.
Zanin, E., Langaro, M. C., Pelepenko, L. E., Machado, R. L., Fornari, V. J., & Hartmann, M. S. M. (2020). Resistência à fratura de instrumentos reciprocantes Wave One Gold e W-File. Full Dentistry In Science. 11(44), 94-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Karen Tavares Ferreira; Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho; Danielle Cardoso Albuquerque Maia Freire; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e Bezerra; Matheus Bomfim Guimarães ; Murillo Freitas Matos; Alberto Costa Porto Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
