Modelos conceituais utilizados na avaliação de iniciativas de Telessaúde: Protocolo de uma revisão de escopo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15913Palavras-chave:
Telemedicina; Telessaúde; Revisão de escopo; Avaliação; Modelo conceitual.Resumo
Telehealth has the potential to solve several problems in health care and management, increasing the quality, accessibility, utilization, effectiveness and efficiency of services and reducing costs. This article presents a scoping review protocol that aims to characterize the conceptual models and frameworks related to the implementation and evaluation of Telehealth/Telemedicine published in indexed repositories between 2000 and 2020, highlighting the underlying theories, key concepts/dimensions used and types of evaluation involved. The protocol objective is to document the processes involved in methodological planning and execution of a comprehensive scoping review, instructed by the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, that having been developed using the PRISMA-Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Checklist. The PCC (population, concept and context) strategy systematized the search for studies published in the bibliographic databases Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science, covering the period from January 2000 to December 2020. The selection of articles will be carried out in two stages (titles and abstracts, followed by the evaluation of the full text of the articles), by two independent evaluators, with resolution of differences by a third reviewer. Results will be analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, and organized by themes. The final review report will obey the checklist present in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9PWBQ).
Referências
Ahern, D. K., Kreslake, J. M. & Phalen J. M. (2006). What is eHealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of eHealth research. J Med Internet Res., 8(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4
Arbour, G. (2020). Framework for program evaluation: considerations on research, practice, and institutions. Evaluation, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020920890.
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Aromataris, E & Munn, Z. (Editors). (2020) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
American Telemedicine Association (ATA) (2012). ATA telemedicine/telehealth terminology. http://www.americantelemed.org/files/public/standards/glossaryofterms.pdf
Bashshur, R.; Reardon, T. & Shannon, G. (2000). Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 21, 613-637. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.613
Bashshur, R. L., Krupinski, E. A., Daarn, C. R., Merrell, R. C., Woolliscroft, J. O. & Frenk, J. (2020). Telemedicine across time: Integrated health system for the future – A prelude. Telemedicine and e-Health. 26(2), 128-130. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0025
Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Krupinski, E & Grigsby, J. (2011). J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health., 17(6), 484-94. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0103.
Bezerra, A. D. C.; Morais, K. de C.; Alencar, M. de; Sales Junior, R. de O.; Machado, A. L. L. B.; Alves, R. de C. L.; ...; Silva Filho, L.S. da. (2021). Creation and use of technologies to combat COVID-19 during the pandemic period. Research, Society and Development, S. l., 10(2): p. e5210212225, 2021. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12225
Brien, S. E., Lorenzetti, D.L., Lewis, S., Kennedy, J. & Ghali, W. A. (2010). Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci., 5, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-2
Caetano, R., Silva, A. B., Guedes, A. C. C. M., Paiva, C. C. N., Ribeiro, G. R. & Santos, D. L. (2020). Desafios e oportunidades para telessaúde em tempos da pandemia pela COVID-19: uma reflexão sobre os espaços e iniciativas no contexto brasileiro. Cad. Saúde Pública, 36(5), e00088920. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00088920.
Cooper, S., Cant, R., Kelly, M., Levett-Jones, T., McKenna, L., Seaton, P., et al. (2021) An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality. Clin Nurs Res., 30(3), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773819846024
Das, A.V.; Rani, P. K.; Vaddavalli, P.K. (2020) Tele-consultations and electronic medical records driven remote patient care: Responding to the COVID-19 lockdown in India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(6), 1007–12. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib,uid&db=edsdoj&AN=edsdoj.34431944e5914659a30c41fef79b5d34&lang=pt-pt&site=eds-live&scope=site
Gogia, S. (2020) Rationale, history, and basics of telehealth. In: Gogia, S. (Ed.). Fundamentals of Telemedicine and Telehealth. London: ELSEVIER, 2020.
Grigsby, J., Rigby, M., Hiemstra, A., House, M., Olsson, S. & Whitten, P. (2002). The diffusion of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health., 8(1), 79–94.
Hong, Q.N.; Pluye, P.; Fàbregues, S.; Bartlett, G.; Boardman, F.; Cargo, M.; et al. (2018) Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.et al. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
Fatehi, F. & Wootton, R. (2012). Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. J Telemed Telecare., 18(8), 460-4. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2012.gth108
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res.,15(9), 1277-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services. (2012). The Role of Telehealth in an Evolving Health Care Environment: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012 Nov 20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207145/
Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T. & Shekelle P.G. (2014). Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med., 160(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1531
Kane, C.K. & Gillis, K. (2018). The Use of Telemedicine by Physicians: Still The Exception Rather Than The Rule. Health Aff (Millwood)., 37(12), 1923-1930. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05077
Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C.M., McInerney, P., Soares, C.B. &,Parker D (2016). An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs., 13(2), 118-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12144
Lau, F. & Kuziemsky, C (Editors) (2016). Handbook of eHealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach. Victoria: University of Victoria. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481590/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK481590.pdf
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. & O'Brien, K.K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci., 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Mandirola Brieux, H. F., Bhuiyan Masud, J. H., Kumar Meher, S., Kumar, V., Portilla, F., Indarte, S., et al. (2015). Challenges and Hurdles of eHealth Implementation in Developing Countries. Stud Health Technol Inform., 216, 434-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-434
Markiewicz, A., Patrick, I. (2016). Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2016.
Medeiros, A. M. B., Beltrão, B. C. R., Oliveira Neto, F. J., Souza, A. V. D., Carvalho, T. B. A, Torquato, D. A., ...; Silva, A.C.B. da (2020). The challenges of telemedicine in front of the medical – patient relationship in Covid-19 times. Research, Society and Development, S. l., 9(10): e9219109379, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9379
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol., 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Noorani, H. Z. & Picot, J. Assessment of Videoconferencing in Telehealth in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, 2001. http://www.ccohta.ca.
Pan American Health Organization - PAHO (2016). Framework for the Implementation of a Telemedicine Service. Washington, DC: PAHO. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/28414/9789275119037_eng.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., Mcinerney, P., Godfrey, C. M. & Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI evidence synthesis, 18(10), 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Pluye, P. & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health., 35, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., et al. (2015). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.
Silveira, L., Barbosa, A. D., Ferreira, M. K., & Caregnato, S. E. (2020). Citação de dados científicos: scoping review. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 25:1-31. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e72153
Sood, S., Mbarika, V., Jugoo, S., Dookhy, R., Doarn, C.R., Prakash, N., et al. (2007). What Is Telemedicine? A Collection of 104 Peer-Reviewed Perspectives and Theoretical Underpinnings. Telemed J E Health., 13(5), 573-90. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0073
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med., 169, 467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
World Health Organization. (2019). WHO Guideline: Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311941/9789241550505-eng.pdf?ua=1
Yellowlees, P. (2005). Successfully developing a telemedicine system. J. Telemed.Telecearáe, 11(7), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763305774472024
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Vanessa de Lima e Souza; Ione Ayala Gualandi de Oliveira; Rosângela Caetano; Gizele da Rocha Ribeiro; Daniela Lacerda Santos; Angélica Baptista Silva; Rondineli Mendes da Silva
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
1) Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2) Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3) Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
