Systematic literature review protocol: data on cancer health

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21782

Keywords:

Keywords: Systematic Review; Breast cancer; Oncology; Nursing.; Systematic review; Breast cancer; Oncology; Nursing.

Abstract

Background and objective: The systematic review of studies that deal with the self-care of women undergoing mastectomy is crucial to assess the safety and effectiveness of care interventions provided to this portion of the population. The purpose of this article is to present a tutorial for planning and executing systematic reviews in a cohesive way, following a dynamic, team-based workflow. Methods: A systematic literature review is the type of research that organizes, critiques and integrates the evidence available in the literature. The information disclosed in articles is not always free from bias, and to minimize these interferences it is necessary that a literature review includes items such as design, protocol registration, execution, analysis of results and wide dissemination. To maintain cohesion about systematic reviews, researchers have increasingly used the PRISMA flowchart, which has improved the quality of reports from systematic reviews, as it provides a list of items to be described, and this article emphasizes the main steps for carrying out a systematic review. Final considerations: The scientific evidence obtained through a well-designed systematic literature review can provide the health professional with greater confidence at the time of clinical practice, improve the benefits to assisted patients and serve as a tool to assist managers, it can also corroborate to the implementation of new strategies in favor of general health.

Author Biographies

Nathalia Varano, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente do Curso de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.

Mariane Bruna da Silva Mendes, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente do Curso de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Bárbara Mendes de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Discente do Curso de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Tatiana Gonçalves dos Reis, Faculdade Uberlandense de Núcleos Integrados de Ensino, Serviço Social e Aprendizagem

Docente do Curso de Enfermagem da FAESSA

Cristiane Martins Cunha, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Docente do Curso de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Bruna Helena Mellado, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Docente do Curso de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.

Cook, D.J., Mulrow, C.D., & Haynes R.B. (1997). Revisões sistemáticas: síntese das melhores evidências para decisões clínicas. Ann Intern Med, 126 (5), 376-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9054282/.

Descritores em Ciências da Saúde: DeCS. *. ed. rev. e ampl. (2017). São Paulo: BIREME / OPAS / OMS. http://decs.bvsalud.org.

Galvão, M.C.B, & Ricarte, I.L.M. (2020). Revisão sistemática da literatura: conceituação, produção e publicação. LOGEION: Rio de Janeiro, 6 (1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73.

Higgins, J.P.T, & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. http://handbook.cochrane.org.

Liberati, A., Altman, D.G, Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P.C, & Ioannidis, J.P.A et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339. https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2700.

Moloney, R., & Maggs, C. (1999). Uma revisão sistemática das relações entre o planejamento manual de cuidados de enfermagem, manutenção de registros e resultados do paciente. J Adv Nurs, 30 (1), 51-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10403980/.

Santos, C.M.D.C., Pimenta, C.A.D.M., & Nobre, M. R. C. (2007). A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15 (3), 508-511. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=2814/281421874023.

Zotero. [s.l.] (2020). Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media.

Published

02/11/2021

How to Cite

VARANO, N.; MENDES, M. B. da S. .; OLIVEIRA, B. M. de .; REIS, T. G. dos .; CUNHA, C. M. .; MELLADO, B. H. Systematic literature review protocol: data on cancer health . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 14, p. e299101421782, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21782. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21782. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Note Preview