Systematic literature review protocol: data on cancer health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21782Keywords:
Keywords: Systematic Review; Breast cancer; Oncology; Nursing.; Systematic review; Breast cancer; Oncology; Nursing.Abstract
Background and objective: The systematic review of studies that deal with the self-care of women undergoing mastectomy is crucial to assess the safety and effectiveness of care interventions provided to this portion of the population. The purpose of this article is to present a tutorial for planning and executing systematic reviews in a cohesive way, following a dynamic, team-based workflow. Methods: A systematic literature review is the type of research that organizes, critiques and integrates the evidence available in the literature. The information disclosed in articles is not always free from bias, and to minimize these interferences it is necessary that a literature review includes items such as design, protocol registration, execution, analysis of results and wide dissemination. To maintain cohesion about systematic reviews, researchers have increasingly used the PRISMA flowchart, which has improved the quality of reports from systematic reviews, as it provides a list of items to be described, and this article emphasizes the main steps for carrying out a systematic review. Final considerations: The scientific evidence obtained through a well-designed systematic literature review can provide the health professional with greater confidence at the time of clinical practice, improve the benefits to assisted patients and serve as a tool to assist managers, it can also corroborate to the implementation of new strategies in favor of general health.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2009). Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.
Cook, D.J., Mulrow, C.D., & Haynes R.B. (1997). Revisões sistemáticas: síntese das melhores evidências para decisões clínicas. Ann Intern Med, 126 (5), 376-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9054282/.
Descritores em Ciências da Saúde: DeCS. *. ed. rev. e ampl. (2017). São Paulo: BIREME / OPAS / OMS. http://decs.bvsalud.org.
Galvão, M.C.B, & Ricarte, I.L.M. (2020). Revisão sistemática da literatura: conceituação, produção e publicação. LOGEION: Rio de Janeiro, 6 (1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73.
Higgins, J.P.T, & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. http://handbook.cochrane.org.
Liberati, A., Altman, D.G, Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P.C, & Ioannidis, J.P.A et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339. https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2700.
Moloney, R., & Maggs, C. (1999). Uma revisão sistemática das relações entre o planejamento manual de cuidados de enfermagem, manutenção de registros e resultados do paciente. J Adv Nurs, 30 (1), 51-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10403980/.
Santos, C.M.D.C., Pimenta, C.A.D.M., & Nobre, M. R. C. (2007). A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15 (3), 508-511. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=2814/281421874023.
Zotero. [s.l.] (2020). Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nathalia Varano; Mariane Bruna da Silva Mendes; Bárbara Mendes de Oliveira; Tatiana Gonçalves dos Reis; Cristiane Martins Cunha; Bruna Helena Mellado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
