Standardization of the ultrasound for catheterism in brazilian Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): recommendation of cost-effectiveness analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4910

Keywords:

Catheterization; Central venous; Ultrasonography; Interventional; Cost-Effectiveness evaluation; Subclavian Vein; practice guideline.

Abstract

The standardization process of certain technologies in the Brazilian Unified Health System must be proceded by cost-effectiveness analyzes. The catheterization procedure is performed in 8% of hospitalized patients and in 15% it causes complications. In view of this scenario, a technology that can provide safety for patients and professionals and reduce the rate of complications must be analyzed and perhaps incorporated into the medical routine. In this way, the objective is to determine the economic feasibility of the technique of central catheterization in a subclavian vein guided by ultrasound compared to guidance by anatomical references, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Through cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree model under a population of adult patients in a tertiary health care setting with materials and procedures costs estimated in Brazilian purchase records banks. The outcomes were defined in a literature review by incidence. The results showed that the intervention cost the procedure R$53.81. Despite this, 80.1% of the simulations proved to be cost-effective and 16.5% “dominant”. Other factores corroborated the discussion, concluding the intervention as very cost-effective and the result brings security to de manager when making decisions regarding the standardization of technology.

References

AHRQ. (2013). Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Disponível em:

https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/services/quality/patientsftyupdate/ptsafetysum.pdf

ANVISA. (2017). Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção da Corrente Sanguínea. In Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção Relacionada à Assistência à Saúde ( 4: 49-77): ANVISA.

Brasil. (2014). Diretrizes metodológicas : Diretriz de Avaliação Econômica (2). Brasilia: Ministério da Saúde.

Brass, P., Hellmich, M., Kolodziej, L., Schick, G., & Smith, A. F. (2015). Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9(1).

Gallotti, R. M. D. (2004). Eventos adversos: o que são? Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 50(2), 114-114.

Heffner, A. C., & Androes, M. P. (2015). Overview of central venus access. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Disponível em: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-central-venous-access-in-adults

Kornbau, C., Lee, K. C., Hughes, G. D., & Firstenberg, M. S. (2015). Central line complications. International journal of critical illness and injury science, 5(3), 170-178.

Kusminsky, R. E. (2007). Complications of central venous catheterization. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204(4), 681-696.

Lalu, M. M., Fayad, A., Ahmed, O., Bryson, G. L., Fergusson, D. A., Barron, C. C., Thompson, C. (2015). Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Critical care medicine, 43(7), 1498-1507.

Mansfield, P. F., Hohn, D. C., Fornage, B. D., Gregurich, M. A., & Ota, D. M. (1994). Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(26), 1735-1738.

Mendes, W., Martins, M., Rozenfeld, S., & Travassos, C. (2009). The assessment of adverse events in hospitals in Brazil. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 21(4), 279-284.

Merrer, J., De Jonghe, B., Golliot, F., Lefrant, J.-Y., Raffy, B., Barre, E., Bosquet, C. (2001). Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Jama, 286(6), 700-707.

NICE. (2016). Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. NICE technology appraisal guidance. 49. Disponível em: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta49

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M. , Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.

Petisco, G. M., Petisco, A. C. G. P., Fiato, U. A. P., & Santos, F. B. (2013). Cateterização Venosa Guiada por Ultrassom: Relato de Caso e Revisão da Literatura. Rev. bras. ecocardiogr. imagem cardiovasc, 26(3), 228-235.

Pichon-Riviere, A., Augustovski, F., Garcia, M. S., & Caporale, J. (2015). The Efficiency Path: An Estimation of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds for 185 Countries Based on Per Capita Health Expenditures and Life Expectancy. Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 18(7), 695-696.

Pinto, M., Santos, M., & Trajman, A. (2016). Limiar de custo-efetividade: uma necessidade para o Brasil? J Bras Econ Saúde, 8(1), 58-60.

Santos, V. C. C. (2010). As análises econômicas na incorporação de tecnologias em saúde: reflexões sobre a experiência brasileira. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Brasil

Trindade, E., Hofmeister, M. G., Fornazier, C., Cruz, C. F., Almeida, K., Torelly, E. M., & Otubo, E. L. (2008). SINEPS-2006 E NOTIVISA–2007: Notificações de tecnovigilância envolvendo cateteres venosos centrais. ANVISA. Disponível em: https://docplayer.com.br/8352214-Sineps-2006-e-notivisa-2007-notificacoes-de-tecnovigilancia.html

Tsotsolis, N., Tsirgogianni, K., Kioumis, I., Pitsiou, G., Baka, S., Papaiwannou, A., . . . Katsikogiannis, N. (2015). Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion. Annals of translational medicine, 3(3), 40.

Watanabe, M., Morais, C. A. D., Júnior, C., & De Souza, A. (2007). Considerações sobre eficiência administrativa relacionado aos exames de ultra-sonografia, tomografia computadorizada e ressonância magnética nas afecções orbitárias. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. 66(6), 376-382

Published

16/06/2020

How to Cite

BOLLER, C. E. P.; SENNA, K. M. S.; TEIXEIRA, R. da S.; GOULART, M. C.; TURA, B. R.; SANTOS, M. da S. Standardization of the ultrasound for catheterism in brazilian Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): recommendation of cost-effectiveness analysis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e861974910, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4910. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4910. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences