Standardization of the ultrasound for catheterism in brazilian Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS): recommendation of cost-effectiveness analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4910Keywords:
Catheterization; Central venous; Ultrasonography; Interventional; Cost-Effectiveness evaluation; Subclavian Vein; practice guideline.Abstract
The standardization process of certain technologies in the Brazilian Unified Health System must be proceded by cost-effectiveness analyzes. The catheterization procedure is performed in 8% of hospitalized patients and in 15% it causes complications. In view of this scenario, a technology that can provide safety for patients and professionals and reduce the rate of complications must be analyzed and perhaps incorporated into the medical routine. In this way, the objective is to determine the economic feasibility of the technique of central catheterization in a subclavian vein guided by ultrasound compared to guidance by anatomical references, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Through cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree model under a population of adult patients in a tertiary health care setting with materials and procedures costs estimated in Brazilian purchase records banks. The outcomes were defined in a literature review by incidence. The results showed that the intervention cost the procedure R$53.81. Despite this, 80.1% of the simulations proved to be cost-effective and 16.5% “dominant”. Other factores corroborated the discussion, concluding the intervention as very cost-effective and the result brings security to de manager when making decisions regarding the standardization of technology.
References
AHRQ. (2013). Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Disponível em:
ANVISA. (2017). Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção da Corrente Sanguínea. In Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção Relacionada à Assistência à Saúde ( 4: 49-77): ANVISA.
Brasil. (2014). Diretrizes metodológicas : Diretriz de Avaliação Econômica (2). Brasilia: Ministério da Saúde.
Brass, P., Hellmich, M., Kolodziej, L., Schick, G., & Smith, A. F. (2015). Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9(1).
Gallotti, R. M. D. (2004). Eventos adversos: o que são? Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 50(2), 114-114.
Heffner, A. C., & Androes, M. P. (2015). Overview of central venus access. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Disponível em: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-central-venous-access-in-adults
Kornbau, C., Lee, K. C., Hughes, G. D., & Firstenberg, M. S. (2015). Central line complications. International journal of critical illness and injury science, 5(3), 170-178.
Kusminsky, R. E. (2007). Complications of central venous catheterization. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204(4), 681-696.
Lalu, M. M., Fayad, A., Ahmed, O., Bryson, G. L., Fergusson, D. A., Barron, C. C., Thompson, C. (2015). Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Critical care medicine, 43(7), 1498-1507.
Mansfield, P. F., Hohn, D. C., Fornage, B. D., Gregurich, M. A., & Ota, D. M. (1994). Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(26), 1735-1738.
Mendes, W., Martins, M., Rozenfeld, S., & Travassos, C. (2009). The assessment of adverse events in hospitals in Brazil. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 21(4), 279-284.
Merrer, J., De Jonghe, B., Golliot, F., Lefrant, J.-Y., Raffy, B., Barre, E., Bosquet, C. (2001). Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Jama, 286(6), 700-707.
NICE. (2016). Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. NICE technology appraisal guidance. 49. Disponível em: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta49
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M. , Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Petisco, G. M., Petisco, A. C. G. P., Fiato, U. A. P., & Santos, F. B. (2013). Cateterização Venosa Guiada por Ultrassom: Relato de Caso e Revisão da Literatura. Rev. bras. ecocardiogr. imagem cardiovasc, 26(3), 228-235.
Pichon-Riviere, A., Augustovski, F., Garcia, M. S., & Caporale, J. (2015). The Efficiency Path: An Estimation of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds for 185 Countries Based on Per Capita Health Expenditures and Life Expectancy. Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 18(7), 695-696.
Pinto, M., Santos, M., & Trajman, A. (2016). Limiar de custo-efetividade: uma necessidade para o Brasil? J Bras Econ Saúde, 8(1), 58-60.
Santos, V. C. C. (2010). As análises econômicas na incorporação de tecnologias em saúde: reflexões sobre a experiência brasileira. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Brasil
Trindade, E., Hofmeister, M. G., Fornazier, C., Cruz, C. F., Almeida, K., Torelly, E. M., & Otubo, E. L. (2008). SINEPS-2006 E NOTIVISA–2007: Notificações de tecnovigilância envolvendo cateteres venosos centrais. ANVISA. Disponível em: https://docplayer.com.br/8352214-Sineps-2006-e-notivisa-2007-notificacoes-de-tecnovigilancia.html
Tsotsolis, N., Tsirgogianni, K., Kioumis, I., Pitsiou, G., Baka, S., Papaiwannou, A., . . . Katsikogiannis, N. (2015). Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion. Annals of translational medicine, 3(3), 40.
Watanabe, M., Morais, C. A. D., Júnior, C., & De Souza, A. (2007). Considerações sobre eficiência administrativa relacionado aos exames de ultra-sonografia, tomografia computadorizada e ressonância magnética nas afecções orbitárias. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. 66(6), 376-382
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
