Intercropping arugula with aromatic condiment species affords better yields, biological efficiency and financial return

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13237

Keywords:

Eruca sativa Miller; Petroselinum crispum; Coriandrum sativum; Allium tuberosum; Biological efficiency.

Abstract

Intercropping affords an increase in productivity by optimising the area used, as well as maximising input use efficiency the financial return of intercroping systems was higher than that observed in the respective individual cultures. Here we show prominently that the financial return of the consortium systems was higher than that observed in the respective individual cultures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agronomic parameters, biological and productive efficiency, and economic performance of arugula under a single and intercropped system. The study was conducted at the Teaching Garden of the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil, in a randomised block design, with four replications and seven treatments: T1 (single arugula), T2 (arugula intercropped with coriander), T3 (arugula intercropped with parsley), T4 (arugula intercropped with garlic chives), T5 (single coriander), T6 (single parsley) and T7 (single garlic chives). Phytotechnical evaluations were carried out. Biological efficiency was evaluated based on the following factors: land use efficiency index or land equivalent ratio (LER), relative contribution of the arugula crop to the LER (CRC), area time equivalent ratio (RAET) and system productivity index (IPS). For the economic analysis, the following were evaluated: operational production costs (OC; BRL ha-1), gross revenue (GR; BRL ha-1), gross profit (GP; BRL ha-1), rate of return (RR; %) and profitability index (PI;%). The system based on arugula intercropped with coriander showed the best agronomic performance and biological efficiency. Productivity and economic advantage under this intercropped system were also superior to the other treatments.

References

Abade, M. T. R., Klosowski, E. S., Rocha, M. E. L., Coutinho, P. W. R., Souza, F. L. B. & Barabasz, R. F. (2019). Morfometria de cultivares de rúcula sob telas de sombreamento e pleno sol na primavera. Agrometeoros 27, 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.31062/agrom.v27i1.

Akshatha, K., Anand, B. M., Vishwanath, Y. C., Gasti, V. D. & Mallikarjun, G. A. (2019). Effect of intercropping system on yield components of ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi Sprague) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) with leafy vegetables. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7, 141-145. https://dx.doi.org/10.22271/chemi.

Alcon F., Marin-Minano, C., Zabala, J. A., De-Miguel, M. D. & Martinez-Paz, J. M. (2020). Valorizando os benefícios da diversificação através do consórcio em agroecossistemas mediterrâneos: Uma abordagem experimental de escolha. Economia Ecológica 171, 1-10. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106593.

Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., Gonçalves, J. L. de M. & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711-728.

Barros Júnior A, Cecílio Filho AB, Resende BLA, Lins HÁ (2020) Nitrate accumulation in lettuce and rocket in response to nitrogen fertilization in intercropping. Revista Caatinga. Rev. Caatinga 33: 260-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252020v33n128rc.

Bezerra Neto, F., Porto, V. C. N., Gomes, E. G., Cecílio Filho, A. B. & Moreira, J. N. (2012.) Assessment of agroeconomic indices in polycultures of lettuce, rocket and carrot through uni and multivariate approaches in semi-arid Brazil. Ecological Indicators 14, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.006.

Brito, E. A. S. (2018). Consórcio de plantas aromáticas com pimenta malagueta (Capsicum frutescens) como estratégia de manejo de pragas. Dissertation, University Federal of Viçosa. https://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/23207.

Cecílio Filho, A. B., Costa, C. C., Rezende, B. L. A. & Leewen, R. V. (2008). Viabilidade produtiva e econômica do consórcio entre chicória e rúcula em função da época de plantio. Horticultura Brasileira 26, 316-320. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362008000300005.

Chitarra, M. I. F. & Chitarra, A. B. (2005). Pós-Colheita de frutas e hortaliças: Fisiologia e Manuseio. Universidade Federal de Lavras.

Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) (2010) Custos de produção agrícola: a metodologia da Conab. CONAB.

Cunha, F. F., Godoy, A. R., Magalhães, F. F., Castro, M. A. & Leal, A. J. F. (2013). Irrigação de diferentes cultivares de rúcula no nordeste do Mato Grosso do Sul. Instituto Nacional do Semiárido 2 (3), 131-141.

Trupti, P. D., Gadhiya, A. D. & Patel, G. D. (2018). A Review: Effect of Inter Cropping in Horticultural Crops. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci 7 (02): 1512-1520. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.182.

Favacho, F.S., Lima J.S.S., Bezerra Neto, F., Silva, J.N. & Barros Junior, A. P. (2017). Productive and economic efficiency of carrot intercropped with cowpea vegetable resulting from green manure and different spatial arrangements. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 48(2), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170039.

Hata, F. T., Ventura, U. M., Paula, M. T., Shimizu, G. D., Paula, J. C. B., Kussaba, D. A. O. & Souza, N. V. (2019). Intercropping garlic in strawberry fields improves land equivalent ratio and gross income. Ciência Rural 49 (12), 1-8p. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190338.

Hendges, A. R. A. A., Guimarães, M. A., Vale, J. C., Lima Neto, B. P. L. (2019). Agronomic performance and biological efficiency of kale intercropped with spice species. Rev. Caatinga 32 (1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252019v32n102rc.

Hiebsch, C. K. & Mccollum, R. E. (1987). Area x time equivalency ratio: a method of evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal 79 (1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010004x.

Islam, M. R., Alam, M. R., Sabagh, A. E., Barutçular, C., Ratnasekera, D., Kizilgeçi, F. & Islam, M. S. (2018). Evaluation of turmeric-mung bean intercrop productivity through competition functions. Acta agriculturae Slovenica 111 (1), 199-207. https://doi:10.14720/aas.2018.111.1.19.

Li, C., Hofland, E., Kuyper, T. W., Yu, Y., Li, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, F. & Werf, W. (2020). Yield gain, complementarity and competitive dominance in intercropping in China: A meta-analysis of drivers of yield gain using additive partitioning. European Journal of Agronomy 113, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.125987.

Maduwanthi, A. K. M. R. B. & Karunarathna, B. (2019). Biological and Economic benefit of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Intercropping in Sandy Regosol. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 8(1), 28-34.

Manasa, P., Maitra, S. & Barman, S. (2020). Yield Attributes, Yield, Competitive Ability and Economics of Summer Maize-Legume Intercropping System. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology 13 (1), 33-38. https://doi 10.30954/0974-1712.1.2020.16.

Meixu, T., Tieerd, G. F., Stomph, J., Jing, W., Wen, Y., Lizhen, Z., Qiang, C. & Van Der Werf, W. (2020). Modelagem dinâmica baseada em processos do crescimento das culturas e extração competitiva de água no consórcio de faixas de revezamento: desenvolvimento e aplicação de modelos no consórcio de milho e trigo. Field Crops Research 246, 1-13.

Montezano, E. M. & Peil, R. M. N. (2006). Sistema de consórcio na produção de hortaliças. Revista Brasileira de Agrociência 12, 129-132.

Odo, P. E. (1991). Evaluation of Short and Tall Sorghum Varieties in Mixtures with Cowpea in the Sudan Savanna of Nigeria: Land Equivalent Ratio, Grain Yield and System Productivity Index. Experimental Agriculture 27 (4), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700019426.

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J. & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica [recurso eletrônico]. 1. ed. – Santa Maria, RS : UFSM, NTE.

Pinheiro, M., Pereira, J. S., Coutinho, C. R., Filgueiras, R. M. C., Guimarães, M. A. & Mesquita, R. O. (2019). Intercropping of collard green and radish ‘Cometo’: spatial arrangement and growing efficiency. Rev. Ceres 66 (4), 243-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201966040001.

Purquerio, L. F. V., Demant, L. A. R., Goto, R. & Villas Boas, R. L. (2007). Efeito da adubação nitrogenada de cobertura e do espaçamento sobre a produção de rúcula. Horticultura Brasileira 25 (3), 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362007000300028.

Ribas, R., Dutra Filho, A., Barbosa, J. & Rolim, G. (2020). Land Equivalent Ratio in the Intercropping of Cucumber with Lettuce as a Function of Cucumber Population Density. Agriculture. Agriculture 10 (88), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10030088.

Silva, I. N., Bezerra Neto, F., Barros Junior, A. P., Lima, J. S. S., Chaves, A. P., Nunes, R. L. C., Lins, H. A. & Albuquerque, J. R. T. (2019). Agro-biological and economic efficiency in a beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) production system fertilized with hairy woodrose (Merremia aegyptia (L.) Urb.) as green manure. AJCS 13 (03):395-402. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.19.13.03.p1297.

Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M. & Murphy, A. (2017). Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6th. ed. Porto Alegre, Artmed.

Trevisoli, E. D. V. G., Mendonça, H. F. C., Dildey, O. D. F., Dartora, J., Rissato, B. B., Roncato, S. C., Klosowski, E. S., Tsutsumi, C. Y. & Echer, M. M. (2017). Ambiência e desempenho produtivo de rúcula cultivada em diferentes espaçamentos. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis 16 (1), 230-236. https://doi.org/10.18188/1983-1471/sap.v16n1p230-236.

Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping: its importance and research needs. Part 1: Competition and yield advantagens. Field Crop Abstracts 32 (1), 1-10.

Downloads

Published

14/03/2021

How to Cite

VIANA, C. dos S.; GUIMARÃES, M. de A.; LEMOS NETO, H. de S.; LIMA NETO, B. P. .; SAMPAIO, Ítalo M. G. .; HENDGES, A. R. A. de A. .; RABELO, J. da S. . Intercropping arugula with aromatic condiment species affords better yields, biological efficiency and financial return. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. e21910313237, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13237. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13237. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Caris dos Santos Viana; Marcelo de Almeida Guimarães; Hozano de Souza Lemos Neto; Benedito Pereira Lima Neto; Ítalo Marlone Gomes Sampaio; Ana Régia Alves de Araújo Hendges; Janiquelle da Silva Rabelo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.