The contractual infringement and damages to Municipal Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21575Keywords:
Municipal Administration; Contract Management; Accountability.Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the problem of contractual management and the damage that contractual interference brings to the municipal public administration. The perfect management of public administration contracts minimizes problems and eventual failures in performance and delivery. This perfection of management essentially involves a firm contract for performance and a delegation of responsibility to other public agents, which means that the chosen one has a particular responsibility, namely the absolute verification of the contract's performance. In order for such issues to be spared, it is admirable that the contractual management takes place in a prudent and responsible manner. It can also be said that probity must govern the entire life cycle of the contract. The article also deals with the responsibility of the public manager, since he has the right to delegate an administrative act, he continues to be bound by the responsibility for that which has been delegated. The manager has the obligation to make a good choice when appointing the contract inspector, in the sense that by delegating unprepared employees, the public manager will be assuming the risks that may arise from a bad choice. In addition to responsibly appointing the manager, the public agent must offer training so that the management, if any, can be done in an improved manner. Furthermore, the contract manager/fiscal must be aware that, due to his legal attributions, he has the competence to manage and decide, which makes him responsible for that administered object, so he must manage it properly so that the consequences of the Law do not fall upon him.
References
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República do Brasil de 1988. <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm.
Brasil. (2021). Lei Nº 14.133, de 1º de abril De 2021. < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/L14133.htm>.
Brasil. (2017). Ministério da Economia, Instrução Normativa n. 05 de 26 de maio de 2017. <https://www.comprasgovernamen tais.gov.br/index.php/legislacao/instrucoes-normativas/760-instrucao-normativa-n-05-de-25-de-maio-de-2017>.
Brasil. (2021). Supremo Tribunal Federal, Ação declaratória de constitucionalidade n. 16/DF – Distrito Federal. Relator: Ministro Cezar Peluso. Pesquisa de Jurisprudência.http://stf.jus.br/portal/jurisprudencia/listarJurisprudencia.asp?s1=%28A%C7%C3O+DIRETA+DE+CONSTITUCIONALIDADE%29%2816%2ENUME%2E+OU+16%2EACMS%2E%29&base=baseAcordaos&url=http://tinyurl.com/y5u2vwxd.
Brasil. (2003). Tribunal de Contas da União, Acórdão n. 695/2003 – 1ª Câmara, Relator: Ministro Augusto Sherman. Tomada de Contas Especial (TCE). Pesquisa de Jurisprudência. https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordao-completo/695/NUMACORDAO%253A695%2520 ANOACORDAO%2 53A2003/DTRELEVANCIA%20desc,%20NUMACORDAOINT%20desc/1/%20?uuid=a3ddef40-54dc-11e9-8628-558d24a9d311.
Brasil. (2006). Tribunal de Contas da União, Acórdão n. 859/2006 – Plenário, Relator: Ministro Marcos Vinicios Vilaça. Pesquisa de Jurisprudência. <https://pesquisa.apps.tcu.gov.br/#/documento/acordaocompleto/1084820036.PROC/NUMACORDAO%253A859%2520ANOACORDAO%253A2006/DTRELEVANCIA%20desc,%20NUMACORDAOINT%20desc/0/%20?uuid=9679e0f0-54e3-11e9-9a38-0f046d648e43.
Brasil. (2011). Tribunal Superior do Trabalho, Súmula n. 331. Contrato de prestação de serviços. Legalidade (nova redação do item IV e inseridos os itens V e VI à redação) - Res. 174/2011, DEJT divulgado em 27, 30 e 31.05.2011. Súmulas da Jurisprudência Uniforme do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. http://www.tst.jus.br/web/guest/sumulas.
Brasil. (2013). Tribunal de Contas da União, Responsabilização de Agentes Segundo a Jurisprudência do TCU – Uma Abordagem a partir de Licitações e Contratos.https://portal.tcu.gov.br/biblioteca-digital/responsabilizacao-de-agentes-segundo-a-jurisprudencia-do-tcu-uma-abordagem-a-partir-de-licitacoes-e-contratos-aulas-1-a-5.htm.
Breda, Juliano (coord.). Crimes de Licitação e Contratações Públicas, RT (2021).
Carvalho, Matheus. (2019). Manual de direito administrativo. JusPODIVM (2019).
Enap. (2018). Manual de Gestão e de Fiscalização de Contratos de Serviços Terceirizados da Enap, Portaria/ENAP n. 57.
Filho, J. (2012). Manual de Direito Administrativo. Atlas.
Filho, M. (2010). Curso de Direito Administrativo. Fórum.
Gil, A. (2012). Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. Atlas.
Ibam. (2009). Manual do Prefeito. IBAM.
Justen Filho, Marçal. (2019) Comentários à lei de licitações e contratos administrativos. (18a ed.), Revista dos Tribunais
Justen Filho, Marçal. (2021) Comentários à Lei de Licitações e Contratações Administrativas, Thomson Reuters
Lakatos, E. & Marconi, M. (2001). Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. Atlas.
Leite, J., Souza, H. & Nascimento, E. 2010. Contratualização na saúde: proposta de um contrato único para os programas no Estado de Minas Gerais, RAS, 12(46).
Lima, R. Beserra, T. & Formiga, N. (2021). Public contracts and their management by the head of the municipal executive. Research, Society and Development, 10(10), e115101018382. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18382
Mazza, Alexandre. (2019) Manual de direito administrativo. (9a ed.), Saraiva
Meirelles, H. (1995). Direito Municipal Brasileiro. Malheiros.
Melo, C. (2005). Curso de Direito Administrativo. Malheiros Editores.
Monteiro, C., & Mezzaroba, O. (2009). Manual de Metodologia da Pesquisa no Direito. Saraiva.
Pietro, M. (2014). Direito Administrativo. Atlas.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ricardo Ovidio de Oliveira Lima; Thalita Kelle Pires Beserra; Pedro Victor Miranda de Oliveira; Jhonatha Magalhães Silva; Jose Rosman Varjão Alves de Albuquerque; Isabele Thalyta Oliveira Andrade de Melo; Nilton Soares Formiga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
